Submit your comments on this article | ||
-Short Attention Span Theater- | ||
Arch-Druid of Canterbury Denounces the Internet | ||
2005-06-16 | ||
![]() THE Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, has criticised the new web-based media for "paranoid fantasy, self-indulgent nonsense and dangerous bigotry". None of which, obviously, are found in the traditional media. He described the atmosphere on the world wide web as a free-for-all that was "close to that of unpoliced conversation". "Unpoliced conversation"? The horror! Isn't that how the evil, world-destroying USA got started? This statement highlights another point of agreement between the religious left and its ally in the campaign to roll back the Enlightenment, militant Islam.
Online professionalism is the answer, and this is enforced by massive and immediate feedback. This can give the online journalist an inherent advantage in credibility, as can the multiplicity of search and checking options. Dr Williams also extended his wide-ranging critique of journalistic practice to the traditional media, arguing that there are "embarrassingly low levels of trust" in the profession and that claims about what is in the public interest need closer scrutiny. The net is doing exactly that, holding to the MSM to account for the first time in their history and changing the world in the process. He called for a "more realistic, less fevered" approach to stories by journalists and added: "There is a difference between exposing deceptions that sustain injustice and attacking confidentialities or privacies that in some sense protect the vulnerable."
That is impossible, the institutional media are collapsing because their malfeasance is finally being exposed, and this malfeasance is now recognized as inherent in the nature of centralized activist media themselves. They cannot reform, even if their pathological hubris would permit it. | ||
Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy |
#23 I believe the Druids disappeared for centuries after the great Roman ass whooping and then they reemerged (I could be wrong but I think about the same time as D&D was invented). Why could the Odin worshipers not reappear, it's all mythology and self-dillusion anyway. |
Posted by: RJSchwarz 2005-06-16 23:59 |
#22 Barb My family (dad's side) were the keepers of Thor's holy grove. The whole bunch were excommunicated from the Church for 100 years before even converting... Lots of zerkers in the tree too... |
Posted by: 3dc 2005-06-16 23:55 |
#21 They're still around. |
Posted by: ed 2005-06-16 23:52 |
#20 They've gone here, BH. Why do you ask? ;-p |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2005-06-16 23:19 |
#19 No offense, but where are the Odinites these days? Not exactly an example of a culture that survived. |
Posted by: BH 2005-06-16 17:02 |
#18 "Er, um, Mr. Schwarz, one of the problems in Britain is all the people who follow a violent mythology. I don't think we need any more of those" Um, no. If you act submissive you encourage the strong to make you their b1tch. If you act strong they will look elsewhere. Nobody would call the worshipers of Odin submissive. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2005-06-16 16:59 |
#17 Blair Broadcasting Company (BBC) can not blame people for not listening anymore, thatâs what eventually happens when someone keeps telling lies and the trouble is once someone gets a name like that it becomes very hard to shake it off |
Posted by: Justice 2005-06-16 15:01 |
#16 Yeah, well the Internet denounces YOU, Mr. Archdruid guy. How do you like them apples? |
Posted by: The Internet 2005-06-16 14:38 |
#15 I go to an Episcopal church (and I disavow any org higher than my parish), and we pray for this guy every week. However, my prayer is always that this guy gets a clue. |
Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-06-16 13:19 |
#14 âparanoid fantasy, self-indulgent nonsense and dangerous bigotryâ![]() Sen . Dick Durbin of Illinois compares the treatmnent of enemy combatants at Guantanomo to Nazi Germany, Soviet Gulags, and Pol Pot... Maybe archdruid was talking about Dick Durbin? ![]() |
Posted by: BigEd 2005-06-16 13:13 |
#13 We need MORE! WE NEED A ORGY OF MAD-MAX STYLE OF DEATH AND DESTRUCTION!!!!! |
Posted by: mmurray821 2005-06-16 13:03 |
#12 Er, um, Mr. Schwarz, one of the problems in Britain is all the people who follow a violent mythology. I don't think we need any more of those. |
Posted by: Jackal 2005-06-16 12:42 |
#11 Look, the guy's a druid, but not a good one since the Druids have not had a single wickerman full of criminals burned since he took office. This guy's a fake, a pretender, a fool who played one too many games of Dungeons and Dragons and lost his grip. Idiot, Odin, Thor and their Norse berserkers could kick the crap out of your panzy Celtic gods. If you're gonna worship mythology at least find an ass-kicking pantheon you losers. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2005-06-16 10:52 |
#10 I guess since the good Archbishop can't figure out how to keep butts in the pews at the creaky COE, he thought it was good time to start burnishing his credentials as media critic. Give the man credit, though: you have to really work hard to develop an ear that tone-deaf. |
Posted by: Dreadnought 2005-06-16 10:51 |
#9 God help him and his church! LOL Concealment as a virtue of sorts? For snipers, submarines, vunerable animals and insects, fraudsters and criminals surely it is needed. Concealment is no virtue to uphold in the public realm although it is a necessary evil in some contexts. To be tolerated but not applauded. Concealment is very often a telling sign of guilt. Journalists are not disliked generally for failing to practice concealment. Quite the opposite, they are roundly criticized for concealing the identity of nonexistent, extremely biased, or misconstrued sources. They are roundly criticized for concealing inconvenient facts that are material to what they are reporting but not consistent with the tenor, opinion or bias of that reporting. |
Posted by: Tkat 2005-06-16 09:47 |
#8 I just spent the last month listening to the "Democratic" Party tell us how eeevil Christians are. So obviously I'm not going to listen to you, Chuckles. |
Posted by: BH 2005-06-16 09:40 |
#7 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Unus multorum. Nemo me impune lacessit! |
Posted by: OldSpook 2005-06-16 09:06 |
#6 âclose to that of unpoliced conversationâ Lol, what do you mean "close"? The net IS "unpoliced conversation", and more the better for it. Who the hell wants "policed conversation"? |
Posted by: Spot 2005-06-16 08:49 |
#5 PBMcL - Laughing loudly. The institutional media's business model is collapsing. They are losing ad revenues and serious news consumers in droves. The agenda peddling and malfeasance merely accelerates the process. |
Posted by: phil_b 2005-06-16 01:55 |
#4 muck - he's probably talking about Instapundit or Michelle Malkin. If he were ever to read Rantburg, his eyes would jump out of their sockets and burst into flames... |
Posted by: PBMcL 2005-06-16 01:04 |
#3 akoy...im confyooserd. thisn bad..good or wat? guesn it all depends hoo hez talkin bowt. rantburg, kos? teh mother soopreeme of all that is troo and rite in teh yooniverse fark.com? hooz he talkin bowt? cal me a litter slo tonite. |
Posted by: muck4doo 2005-06-16 00:38 |
#2 In a lecture to media professionals, politicians and church leaders at Lambeth Palace in London last night, Dr Williams wondered whether a balance could be struck between the professionalism of the classical media and the relative disorder of online communication. There is already a balance. And the media are about 20 year overdue with facts. So we are calling them up and demanding facts instead of agenda, and they are late. (Can you tell I do some collections? ;o) ) There is also a balance as well. The media beats us over the head with agenda, and we beat them with facts. Someone is going to lose this fight in a public marketplace of ideas. Just a hint: It ain't this dhimmi and his dhimmettes in the BBC. |
Posted by: badanov 2005-06-16 00:28 |
#1 damn the heretics! Can't they see I am GOD??? |
Posted by: 2b 2005-06-16 00:17 |