| Submit your comments on this article |
| Down Under |
| Nations blast Japan over Whale hunting |
| 2005-06-20 |
| JAPAN is taking a diplomatic pounding today from anti-whaling nations over its plan to slaughter more than 800 whales over the coming year. Australia, New Zealand and Britain have led a barrage of outrage against one of the world's most powerful countries after it announced plans today to double its catch of minke whales and extend its whaling to include endangered species. At an International Whaling Commission meeting today, Japan said it would catch about 850 minkes annually in the Antarctic Ocean starting with a voyage late this year. Japan said its research plan submitted to the International Whaling Commission the opening of an annual meeting in Ulsan, South Korea. New Zealand's Conservation Minister Chris Carter said: "New Zealand totally rejects Japan's proposals to double the number of whales slaughtered in the Southern Ocean," he said. "Where is the science from 18 years of scientific whaling? Where is the science? It doesn't exist." Australia's Environment Minister Ian Campbell said Japan's plan was an "outrage". Voting at the meeting, he said, "will come down to a clash between those who want to continue to whale and to expand whaling in this millennium and those of us who want to see whaling relegated to an historic fact from the last millennium." Japan also plans to hunt 20 endangered fin whales and broaden its catch to include humpbacks over the next two years. The quota system lets a country go 10 per cent above or below the round figure, meaning Japan could go up to 935 minke whales. Currently, Japan has a guideline of 400 whales a year and most years kills the top limit of 440. Japan, where whale meat is part of the diet, says Western nations that oppose its hunt are offending its culture and that it does not need IWC approval. Australia has spearheaded efforts to stop Japan from hunting near its waters. Japan also said it would extend its hunt from minke whales to larger fin and humpback whales, which are both considered endangered by the World Conservation Union. Japan said it would hunt 10 fin whales a year for the next two years and then raise its quota to 50, with the program to be reviewed in six years. Japan also plans to hunt 50 humpbacks annually from the third year or late 2007. Ben Bradshaw, the British minister responsible for fisheries said the kind of suffering that many whales were subjected to, was "totally unacceptable in 2005". "We don't think there's a humane way to kill a whale," he said. "This is an absolutely vital IWC meeting ... Future generations will not forgive this meeting if we go backwards in our conservation of whales." The boost in the Antarctic Ocean will bring Japan's annual cull of whales to about 1300 as the country also hunts about 380 minke and other whales in the northwestern Pacific. Japan reluctantly accepted a 1986 IWC moratorium on whaling and ended its commercial whaling in the Antarctic Ocean with a voyage from late 1986 to early 1987. But it started "research" whaling with a voyage from late 1987, in line with the IWC charter but was harshly criticised by anti-whaling nations that see it as thinly-disguised commercial whaling. The meat from the "research" is sold on the market in line with IWC rules. Japan said in a statement its new program was meant to "shed light on the ecosystem centring on whales in the Antarctic Ocean, develop a management model covering several species of whales and improve management of minke stocks." Japan would collect data such as the whales' maturity, pregnancy ratios and stomach contents for "more appropriate management of whale stocks," it said. Japan says whaling is an essential part of its heritage that if conducted sustainably and through strict quotas should be allowed to continue. It says recovering whale stocks are increasingly swallowing up profits of the Japanese fishing industry, an argument environmentalist groups completely dismiss. Earlier this month, the WWF conservation group laid into the hunt, saying Japan's stance that it kills whales for research is not only a commercial hunt in disguise but is also based on lousy science. It also said "research" on whales would be more effective by conducting genetic tests on small samples of whale skin that can be removed in a non-harmful way. But Japanese officials argue that non-lethal research gives them only limited information and they need to kill whales to get more detailed data such as how mature they are and whether they are active in reproduction. |
| Posted by:Spavirt Pheng6042 |
| #14 "Is it a fair fight? Is this 'whale' wielding any sort of projectile weapon?" |
| Posted by: mojo 2005-06-20 18:00 |
| #13 "It's a cultural thing" means in this case that Japan doesn't want to mothball its whaling fleet. It's like the Japanese engineering firm that landed a contract to build a bridge to an island nobody goes to for a hundred million dollars: we want people to keep their jobs, whether it makes sense or not. There is no scientific reason to hunt whales. Period. In related news, whale sharks, the largest known fish, have declined in overall length by 2 meters. What this means is that the population is under stress and the sharks simply aren't living as long. Lobsters and fish off the Grand Banks are in the same trouble: overfishing is killing off the older, stronger, hardier breeders. The fisheries are crashing. |
| Posted by: mom 2005-06-20 17:43 |
| #12 LOL Deaconman! The SSN Jimmuah |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-20 17:25 |
| #11 LOL, Deacon Blues |
| Posted by: JFM 2005-06-20 16:07 |
| #10 JFM, do you mean this one? |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2005-06-20 16:04 |
| #9 Hmmm. I wonder why the "It's a cultural thing" line doesn't work for Japan as well as it works for Paleoland? No, I don't wonder. *Sigh*. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2005-06-20 11:31 |
| #8 Wouldn't it be nice if a couple few Japanese whalers were sunk by a US sub, say, USS Jimmy Carter"? |
| Posted by: JFM 2005-06-20 11:28 |
| #7 Here ya do,Phil. "Captain,there be whales here"LTC.Scott:eginering officer. |
| Posted by: raptor 2005-06-20 08:36 |
| #6 Are the specific whales being hunted on the endangered species list? If not, WTF. Another baby seals, puppy dogs, and baby ducks moment.
So yes, there are. And it's not like this is real hunting or anything; it's market hunting, and I don't think anyone of average income in Japan is going to be eating much whale meat. Assume about 1000 2000-lb. whales, and the whales are all-meat... and the population of Japan is 100 million... you get 2000000/100000000... which works out to 2/100 of a pound of whalemeat per year per person in Japan. | ||
| Posted by: Phil Fraering 2005-06-20 08:27 |
| #5 Are the specific whales being hunted on the endangered species list? If not, WTF. Another baby seals, puppy dogs, and baby ducks moment. |
| Posted by: Jong Cravirong9792 2005-06-20 08:07 |
| #4 Sorry, but hunting whales is no different to hunting bear, deer, kangaroo or any other mammal. I'm neutral on hunting anything, but as far as I can see the only thing different about whales is international law and treaties have gotten into the act. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2005-06-20 06:01 |
| #3 they need to kill whales to get more detailed data such as how mature they are probably more mature than the whalers |
| Posted by: Rafael 2005-06-20 04:00 |
| #2 That's a hell of a research project with 400 to 800 whales taken every year. I have seen several whale hunts around Kivalina and Point Hope, Alaska. Pretty neat. They have bowhead and gray whales up there. One time in Barrow, they were pulling a bowhead whale up out of the water and on to the shore with the traditional block and tackle, and rope. Everyone gets in line and heave-hos the whale. Well, one time something failed and the block went sailing into the pullers and killed a woman. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2005-06-20 02:56 |
#1 I wish I knew what snazzy comment went with this... |
| Posted by: Phil Fraering 2005-06-20 01:04 |