| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Better dead than fed, PETA says |
| 2005-06-24 |
| I'm shocked! Shocked! Debra Saunders DON'T BE FOOLED by the slick propaganda of PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The organization may claim to champion the welfare of animals, as the many photos of cute puppies and kittens on its Web site suggest. But last week, two PETA employees were charged with 31 felony counts of animal cruelty each, after authorities found them dumping the dead bodies of 18 animals they had just picked up from a North Carolina animal shelter into a Dumpster. According to the Associated Press, 13 more dead animals were found in a van registered to PETA. The arrest followed a rash of unwelcome discoveries of dead animals dumped in the area. According to veterinarian Patrick Proctor, the PETA people told North Carolina shelters they would try to find the dogs and cats homes. He handed over two adoptable kittens and their mother, only to learn later that they had died, without a chance to find a home, in the PETA van. "This is ethical?" Proctor railed over the phone. "I don't really think so." But it says "ethical" in their name? You mean that's not true? My faith in moonbats just went way WAY down. This is not the first report that PETA killed animals it claimed to protect. In 1991, PETA killed 18 rabbits and 14 roosters it had previously "rescued" from a research facility. "We just don't have the money" to care for them, then PETA-Chairman Alex Pacheco told the Washington Times. The PETA animal shelter had run out of room. We had to destroy them to save them. The Center for Consumer Freedom, which represents the food industry, a frequent target of PETA campaigns, released data filed by PETA with the state of Virginia that shows PETA has killed more than 10,000 animals from 1998 to 2003. "In 2003, PETA euthanized over 85 percent of the animals it took in," said a press release from the lobby, "finding adoptive homes for just 14 percent. By comparison, the Norfolk (Va.) SPCA found adoptive homes for 73 percent of its animals and Virginia Beach SPCA adopted out 66 percent." Do they mention that in the brochure? The Center's David Martosko considered PETA's hefty budget -- reportedly, $20 million -- and many contributions from well-heeled Hollywood celebrities, then figured, "PETA has enough money in the bank to care for every unwanted animal in Virginia (where it has its headquarters) and North Carolina." As long as the celebs feel good about themselves when they fork over the cash. That's whats important. PETA prefers to spend donations, apparently, not caring for flesh-and- blood animals entrusted to it but on campaigns attacking medical researchers, meat-eaters or women wearing furs. It is as if PETA prefers the idea of animals to animals themselves. It's a lot easier to say you care about them than to actually take care of them. Cheaper too. Why does PETA kill animals that might otherwise find a home? I repeatedly phoned PETA, but never reached an official who would answer my questions. PETA's Web site spun the story under the banner, "PETA helping animals in North Carolina" with an emphasis on its efforts to "solve the animal overpopulation in North Carolina." Here's more: "PETA has provided euthanasia services to various counties in that state to prevent animals from being shot with a .22 behind a shed or gassed in windowless metal boxes -- both practices that were carried out until PETA volunteered to provide painless death for the animals." Make that painless deaths for animals that could have found love. Besides, PETA always has been about killing animals. A 2003 New Yorker profile included PETA top dog Ingrid Newkirk's story of how she became involved in animal rights after a shelter put down stray kittens she brought there. So she went to work for an animal shelter in the 1970s, where, she explained, "I would go to work early, before anyone got there, and I would just kill the animals myself. Because I couldn't stand to let them go through (other workers abusing the animals.) I must have killed a thousand of them, sometimes dozens every day." Got some "issues" there maybe, Ingrid? That's right. PETA assails other parties for killing animals for food or research. Then it kills animals -- but for really important reasons, such as running out of room. Martosko hopes animal lovers will learn that their donations will do more good at a local animal shelter than at PETA. "For years," he added, "we thought that PETA just cared for animals more than they cared for humans. But now it seems they don't care much for either." No lie about not caring for people. In 2003, Newkirk hectored late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat because a terrorist blew up a donkey in an attempt to blow up people. Newkirk also told the New Yorker the world would be a better place without people. She explained why she had herself sterilized: "I am opposed to having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it's nothing but vanity, human vanity." Nice lady... Now you know. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals doesn't really like people. PETA has no use for ethics. And PETA kills animals. But it's for their own good! Don't you see that? Hope your house don't get firebombed lady. |
| Posted by:tu3031 |
| #15 As we all know it has nothing to do with Animials and everyting to do with Communist/Socalist agenda. I saw one of these self rightous ass wipes in a brand new SUV plastered with PETA bumper stickers near Vale Colorado. I flipped his ass off. Stupid wankers. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom 2005-06-24 23:16 |
| #14 People for the Euthanizing of Trusting Animals. I help out in the shelter on weekends. This just burns Me up. |
| Posted by: Jackal 2005-06-24 21:25 |
| #13 I'm with you, DB. Except the humanely part. ;-p |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2005-06-24 15:37 |
| #12 Hell, BigEd, I'd like to see them mess around with Snap, my 36 pound boarder collie. And he only THINKS he’s a 135 lb Rottweiler! |
| Posted by: Secret Master 2005-06-24 14:22 |
| #11 This Newkirk thing seems to have a little bit of the Kevorkian syndrome. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-24 13:59 |
| #10 rkb - I would like to see some of those PETA fascists try to monkey business around some 200+ lb Bullmastiff... {heh heh heh} Or even a 135 lb Rottweiler male maybe after the scent of a female dog in heat is placed where the PETAs would have to pick it up on themselves or their clothing before they could get at the dog they were trying to vandalize... {heh heh heh} |
| Posted by: BigEd 2005-06-24 13:43 |
| #9 I'm glad Ingrid got herself spayed. Now if she would just put herself down, humanely, of course, that would be wonderful. |
| Posted by: Desert Blondie 2005-06-24 13:34 |
| #8 I will have a PETA rabbit with my pita. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2005-06-24 13:06 |
| #7 I thought it was common knowledge that PETA was against the very idea of pets. In that light, slaughtering the animals rather than placing them makes sense -- they don't end up pets, after all. |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2005-06-24 12:40 |
| #6 sigh. |
| Posted by: 2b 2005-06-24 11:15 |
| #5 PETA is widely believed by show dog people to have released a number of valuable and deeply loved dogs at shows, several of whom were hit by cars or starved, wandering confused in strange-to-them places. IIRC they took credit for several such releases a few years ago but now won't publicly admit to them after the threat of some hefty lawsuits. I've been at shows where the club was notified of attempts to release dogs. We all try to look out for one another's dogs back in the parking / grooming areas even more carefully now and I've personally warned off a couple of scruffy types mouthing snide nasty slogans around my exercise pens / grooming table at shows. One retired professional handler will occasionally tell the story of finding two young animal rights types about to release crated dogs in his care. They were surprised to find that this older, short, compact man holds a black belt in judo ... and I'm all for Newkirk not reproducing, however, either biologically or ideologically. |
| Posted by: rkb 2005-06-24 11:14 |
| #4 existing system, I meant to say. |
| Posted by: BH 2005-06-24 11:13 |
| #3 Hey, we're talking about the complete upheaval of the existing here. What's a few deaths, as long as they further the goals of the revolution? |
| Posted by: BH 2005-06-24 11:12 |
| #2 All killing of animals is equal, but some killing is more equal than others... |
| Posted by: BigEd 2005-06-24 10:32 |
| #1 Persons for Eating Tasty Animals® |
| Posted by: Dorf 2005-06-24 10:28 |