You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Iraqi PM says two years ‘more than enough’ to secure country
2005-06-28
LONDON - Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari said two years would be “more than enough” to establish security in his country, a task US Defence Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld believes may take up to 12 years.

Following talks with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, al-Jaafari said such factors as building up Iraq’s own security forces, controlling the country’s porous borders and pushing ahead with the political process would all help end the violence. “I think two years will be enough, and more than enough, to establish security in our country,” he said Monday.

Asked about al-Jaafari’s comments, Rumsfeld told a Pentagon news conference on that “I recognize things I don’t know, and that’s one of them. ... There are so many variables that I would be reluctant to pretend that I could look into that crystal ball and say, X number of months or X number of years. I can’t.”

On Sunday, Rumsfeld said “that insurgency could go on for any number of years. Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.”
They're in violent agreement. The country will be secure, and the insurgency will sputter on for a while.
Bolstering the Iraqi security forces and taming the insurgency are considered critical to US plans to withdraw from Iraq.

Rumsfeld also acknowledged that US officials have met with some insurgents - an approach Britain has also employed as it tries to bring stability to the country, Blair disclosed Monday. “It’s our job politically to pull as many people into the political process. That is an engagement not just by the Iraqi government, but by the Americans, ourselves, others. Everybody,” Blair told a news conference Monday. “We are not compromising our position with terrorism or any of the rest of it. We are simply trying, perfectly sensibly, to pull as many people into the democratic fold as possible.”

Later, in a joint news conference with his Iraqi counterpart, Blair refused to give further details of the contacts with insurgents. “I would not exaggerate what is happening here,” he told reporters, when asked if Britain and America were coordinating their efforts. “It is a sensible part of trying to make sure you are bringing as many people into the democratic process as possible.”

Al-Jaafari said he had no objection to the United States and Britain having “dialogue with all the political forces” so long as they were not engaged in violence. “We have not negotiated with anybody who has been involved in bloodshed or explosions,” he added.

Blair said there was a spectrum within the insurgency, ranging from Jordanian-born Abu Musab Al Zarqawi, Iraq’s most-wanted terrorist, and others who are “utterly implacable,” to those who “aren’t engaged in violence but are sympathetic to the violence.”

“And then in the middle (there are) some people who may be involved in the violence or not,” Blair said. “What it’s trying to do is to make sure ... you get those people for example in the Sunni community ... to recognize their best way forward is participating in the December elections,” Blair said.

Members of Iraq’s Shiite-dominated government are hoping more Sunnis will turn out for the planned December vote for a full-term government.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Yep, that's why the Hundred Years War lasted more than a 100 years, it was named too soon while the time table and road map were being setup.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-28 15:23  

#3  I think having a timetable is a great idea. Think how much shorter World War Two could have been if we only set a timetable. Why even the Hundred Years War could have been over in a couple decades if they had only set a timetable.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-06-28 13:13  

#2  Just remember, US troops remained in Germany because of the Soviet Union and in Japan and South Korea because of China and North Korea. With Iran on one side and, the source of terrorist manpower, the Kingdom of Saud on the other, its likely a good force slice of American forces will remain in country for a while.
Posted by: Glinesh Elmart4359   2005-06-28 09:38  

#1  
Iraqi PM says two years ‘more than enough’ to secure country

Well I guess it depends on what you mean by 'secure country'. The jihad against Iraq will last for a long time and suicide bombers will get through and kill people for many years. But perhaps people will simply go on with their life anyway.

I think the US should withdraw some troops this calendar year (maybe only 5-10k) simply as a statement that we have more confidence in the Iraqi forces.
Posted by: mhw   2005-06-28 08:52  

00:00