You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi STILL doesn't Get It
2005-06-29
EFL
Democrats are criticizing President Bush for raising the Sept. 11 attacks while he defends his plan to keep U.S. troops in Iraq as long as it takes to ensure peace in the country. The president, urging patience on an American public showing doubts about his Iraq policy, mentioned the deadly 2001 terrorist attacks five times during a 28-minute address Tuesday night at Fort Bragg, N.C. Some Democrats accused him of falsely reviving the link that he originally used to help justify launching strikes against Baghdad. "The president's frequent references to the terrorist attacks of September 11 show the weakness of his arguments," House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said. "He is willing to exploit the sacred ground of 9/11, knowing that there is no connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq."
Some of us know different, Nancy.
Dang, she's an idiot.
"The war reached our shores on September the 11th, 2001," Bush told a national television audience and 750 soldiers and airmen in dress uniform who mostly listened quietly as they had been asked to do. "Iraq is the latest battlefield in this war," he continued. "Many terrorists who kill innocent men, women, and children on the streets of Baghdad are followers of the same murderous ideology that took the lives of our citizens in New York, in Washington and Pennsylvania. There is only one course of action against them — to defeat them abroad before they attack us at home. We fight today because terrorists want to attack our country and kill our citizens, and Iraq is where they are making their stand. So we will fight them there, we will fight them across the world and we will stay in the fight until the fight is won."
Yo, Nancy: there's the connection.
He offered no shift in course in Iraq.
None needed, Bozo. Work on your patience!
"We have a clear path forward," the president said. "As the Iraqis stand up, we will stand down."

Republican Sen. John McCain defended Bush's call to stop terrorism abroad before it reaches the U.S. shore in an appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live" program. He said those spreading violence in Iraq "are the same guys who would be in New York if we don't win in Iraq." Democrats criticized Bush for not offering more specifics ...
like a timetable. We want a timetable, so we can complain about that!
... about how to achieve success in Iraq along with his frequent mention of the Sept. 11 attacks. "The president's numerous references to September 11 did not provide a way forward in Iraq," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said. "They only served to remind the American people that our most dangerous enemy, namely Osama bin Laden, is still on the loose and al-Qaida remains capable of doing this nation great harm nearly four years after it attacked America."
Right, Harry. Catch ObL and the war is all over!
Bush urged Americans to remember the lessons of Sept. 11 and protect "the future of the Middle East" from men like bin Laden. He repeatedly referred to the insurgents in Iraq as terrorists and said they were killing innocent people to try to "shake our will in Iraq, just as they tried to shake our will on September the 11th, 2001." Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., said it's because of the lessons of the Sept. 11 attacks that he opposes Bush's approach to keeping the troops in Iraq without any timetable for withdrawal.
Let him speak! The man's obviously a military genius...
"The U.S. military presence in Iraq has become a powerful recruiting tool for terrorists, and Iraq is now the premier training ground and networking venue for the next generation of jihadists," Feingold said.
Like moths to a flame, all these terrorists "recruited" go to Iraq. Better there than here, Russ.
Deal with them in Fallujah or in Milwaukee, Russ.
We're there to kill terrs. So quit bitching about having to fight terrs.

I listened to Bush's speech last night. It's the best one I've ever heard him give. Whoever wrote it had obviously read a lot of Churchill's wartime speeches, and probably recently. Churchill would have pronounced the words differently, his cadences would have been more majestic, but he'd have said much the same thing: "We shall fight, and we shall suffer perils..."
Posted by:Bobby

#10  ...This is one reason why I've always said that even if we whacked Bin Laden tomorrow, the smartest thing the leadership could do is deny it forever. Once the Dims had proof that he was gone, they'd cut the throat of anything even resembling a war on terror...because after all, if Bin Laden's dead, the war's over, isn't it?

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2005-06-29 21:31  

#9  Nan's probably doesn't get it at home either. And if she did, she wouldn't know it.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-06-29 18:22  

#8  I've never believed the "we're got Bin Laden and we're keeping him on ice" poppycock but I could really see how useful that might be. MOst sane people know the war won't be over with a Bin Laden capture, does anyone doubt that the Dem leaders will declare it's over though?

People tire of war and the Democrats are trying to exploit that because they know they are weak on defence issues and really, really wish it was over.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-06-29 15:30  

#7  with eyes that wide open, if she opened her mouth, it would split her face.
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-29 12:58  

#6  I know it's really petty to remark on appearances, BUT: between Dragon Lady Pelosi and Sen. Milquetoast Reid, the Dems don't inspire much confidence even when they don't open their mouths.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-06-29 12:56  

#5  the Donk leadership proves to be the gift that keeps on giving
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-29 10:47  

#4  Two talk jocks explained it best this morning on the radio. The Democrats are like a small child that decides it doesn’t want to go anywhere once you are at Disneyland. You already there, you paid for your ticket, and now you should do something. But the small child just stomps its feet and refuses to participate. I like it when the Democrats are portrayed as small children because they seem to go out of their way to act like one. Thank GOD they are not in power.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-06-29 10:34  

#3  "The U.S. military presence in Iraq has become a powerful recruiting tool for terrorists, and Iraq is now the premier training ground and networking venue for the next generation of jihadists," Feingold said."

Why are these otherwise intelligent individuals (Pelosi excepted) still parroting this crap? Let terrorists be recruited and let them go to Iraq.

And there they will die at the hands of the U.S. military.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-29 10:03  

#2  You have to wonder if the dems really believe their own talking points on how "compartmentalized" and unrelated to any other military action they believe the WoT to be, or if they just need to come down on the opposite side of whatever the President says.
Its hard for me to grasp that there are people in positions of power in this country that are as blatantly stupid and partisan as Pelosi, or Kennedy, Kerry, TurbinDurbun et al.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-06-29 08:55  

#1  So Harry your main beef is that we don't have Bin Laden? If we did have him, would your main beef be that he'd be in Gitmo having his Koran abused?
How about when we find out for sure where he is, we nuke the place to make sure we get him? Would you be okay with that?
As far as Pelosi, it's usually not a good idea to listen to the ravings of a menopausal housewife.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-06-29 08:52  

00:00