You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Britain
Blair: No Predetermination for Iraq War
2005-06-30
LONDON (AP) - Prime Minister Tony Blair firmly denied Wednesday that the Bush administration signaled just months after Sept. 11 that a decision was made to invade Iraq, saying he was ``astonished'' by claims that leaked secret memos suggested the U.S. was rushing to war.

In an interview with The Associated Press a day after President Bush delivered a televised defense of the war in Iraq, Blair said defeating the insurgency was crucial to protecting security worldwide, and joined Bush in linking the war with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. ``What happened for me after Sept. 11 is that the balance of risk changed,'' said Blair, interviewed on the stone terrace overlooking the garden of his No. 10 Downing Street offices, where policy meetings on Iraq were held before the invasion.

After Sept. 11, it was necessary to ``draw a line in the sand here, and the country to do it with was Iraq because they were in breach of U.N. resolutions going back over many years,'' he said. ``I took the view that if these people ever got hold of nuclear, chemical or biological capability, they would probably use it.''
Bush needs to say that, over and over again.
Blair was asked about the leaked memos, which suggest strong concerns in the British government that the Bush administration was determined in 2002 to invade Iraq - months before the United States and Britain unsuccessfully sought U.N. Security Council approval for military action. ``People say the decision was already taken. The decision was not already taken.'' Blair said he was ``a bit astonished'' at the intensive U.S. media coverage about the memos, which included minutes of a July 23, 2002, meeting between Blair and top officials at his Downing Street office.

According to the minutes of the meeting, Sir Richard Dearlove, then chief of Britain's intelligence service, said the White House viewed military action against Saddam Hussein as inevitable following the Sept. 11 attacks. Bush ``wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD'' , read the memo, seen by the AP. ``But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.''

In the interview, Blair said raising such concerns was a natural part of any examination of the cause for war. ``The trouble with having a political discussion on the basis of things that are leaked is that they are always taken right out of context. Everything else is omitted from the discussion and you end up focusing on a specific document,'' he said. ``It would be absolutely weird if, when the Iraq issue was on the agenda, you were not constantly raising issues, trying to work them out, get them in the right place,'' he said.
"Context" isn't the strong suit of the Democrats right now.
Blair suggested that ensuring victory in Iraq was now more important than debating the case for invasion. ``The most important thing we can do in Iraq is concentrate on the fact ... that what is happening there is a monumental battle that affects our own security,'' he said. ``You've got every bad element in the whole of the Middle East in Iraq trying to stop that country (from getting) on its feet and (becoming) a democracy.''

Blair echoed Bush's pledge a day earlier to keep U.S. forces in Iraq until the fight is won. ``There is only one side to be on now and it is time we got on it and stuck in there and get the job done, and not leave until the job is done,'' he said.

While Blair's close ties to Bush have cost him with voters at home, he said it's that relationship which allows the countries to talk about tough issues. ``My support for America is not based on you give us support for this and you get that in return,'' Blair said. ``I should only do what is right for Britain. The president should only do what is right for America, and we should both try to do what is right for the world.''
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Step right ladies and gents, come see the fabulous NanoLink. Worlds smallest link right here in Rantburg. Who would believe a link could be made so small. Yes, it's a living breathing link. It is clickable and changes colors before your very eyes. Right here in Rantburg. Be amazed. This is suitable for the entire family.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-30 14:04  

#4  Matt - That's Jeff's Jewel - there's a link at the very end to take you to the source. It rocks, lol!
Posted by: .com   2005-06-30 13:00  

#3  .com, ROTFL. The entire platform of the Democratic party in one post.
Posted by: Matt   2005-06-30 12:18  

#2  If I remember correctly, everyone in the U.S. was howling for blood right after the 9-11 attack and congress overwhelminly approved the invasion. It's a little late now to decide we don't have the belly for it. Screw those A-holes, they had it coming, anyone who is even remotely connected to 9-11 has it coming.
Posted by: Bigjim-ky   2005-06-30 08:53  

#1  But, but, Nancy and Harry and Howie all said it proved, um, something! And it was really really important and uh, Bush Lied! And Haliburton died! And um, er...

Blah blah right-wing Rumsfeld warmonger chickenhawk evil Bushies Wolwowitz and his neocon cabal for oiloiloiloiloiloil blah blah ignorant stupid bloodthirsty morons, the real axis of evil on a ranch in Crawford and blah blah blah no WMD he lied, Bushitler lied, people died died died tie-dyed peace peace peace down with the Zionists! peace peace Kyoto! they hate us they hate us they hate us and what can we do and root causes and root causes and blowback and Plame and Plame and Chalabi Plame Wilson blah blah blah unilateral multinational Halliburton Enronism crony capitalism and it’s all about oiloiloiloil blah blah blah, cowboyish disregard for allies, for the wishes of the world community who rise up against us, the terrorist threat is overblown and anyway, it’s all our fault because we gave Saddam his weapons to begin with, photo of Rummy and Hussein, but make no mistake, he no longer has those weapons because inspections worked, containment worked, and blah blah blah Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Sudan handle it, Roy, handle it handle it, Caspian pipeline oiloiloiloil blah blah blah show me the stockpiles, anthrax CIA plant Richard Clarke said so and we believe him because and unless unless unless Abu Ghraib Abu Ghraib Abu Ghraib, square-jawed cocksucking military jarhead torturing fucks, bring home our troops! We care about the troops! We support the troops and don’t you question our patriotism our love for this fucking filthy crass consumerist bullying country of redneck dolts and biblethumping bourgeois suburbanites with their SUVs and where are the CAFE standards fight the real terror, eco-terror, Israel, the US, imperialist colonialist racist homophobic hegemonic and blah blah blah blah blah because dissent is patriotism and fighting against your country is really fighting for your country and our dissent keeps the nation strong and we’re brave and heroic and up is down and black is white and oiloiloiloiloiloiloiloil blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.™
-Jeff Goldstein, Protein Wisdom
Posted by: .com   2005-06-30 08:50  

00:00