Submit your comments on this article |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
watn yore ecolojical footprints? |
2005-07-05 |
tookn this test(clik em link an try it all yoo gaya hatin an lovin luvers of suvees!) an itn say ifn evryones live like ima live itn take 4 an a haff planets suport teh populashen. >:( final skore 20. notise tho itn chanje if yore chanje yore cuntree. whys taht? wunder watn chainey skored. |
Posted by:muck4doo |
#28 Way cool! 5.5 planets! NASA better get busy and develop an FTL drive so we can start colonizing! Let's start with the Moon, Mars, Titan, Europa, Iapetus (no, wait, according to Hoagland that's a spaceship), heck, let's throw a colony out to Pluto and another one on Mercury for unique property metals of opposite temperature ranges! Gods, these people are stupid, naive, and intransigent in their views that WE'RE ALL GONNA' DIE AND IT'S ALL BUSH'S FAULT!!! Gimme' a gun. I gotta' go hunting... |
Posted by: LC FOTSGreg 2005-07-05 22:55 |
#27 But everybody doesn't live like me, and if they try to I'll nuke 'em. Natural selection at work. |
Posted by: Tom 2005-07-05 20:19 |
#26 60, 13.4 planets. You guys gotta start eating more meat. |
Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2005-07-05 19:02 |
#25 "Dave D. and ed: I'm not worthy to compete against you (I only got a 6). I'm surely in the presence of greatness." Thanks, Xbalanke; that brought tears to my eyes. |
Posted by: Dave D. 2005-07-05 17:07 |
#24 44 acres required for my big behind! |
Posted by: TomAnon 2005-07-05 16:30 |
#23 This quiz is biased against billionaire senators; it was designed merely to embarass me in front of my tree-hugging voters. Karl Rove created this quiz. When I was in Vietnam, I never had to worry about this sort of thing. Really! Don't they know who I am? |
Posted by: John Kerry 2005-07-05 16:15 |
#22 Sh*t! Don't I get any credit for re-cycling? Dammit! If I don't get any credit for it, I quit! |
Posted by: Uninesh Shomosing7734 2005-07-05 15:15 |
#21 3.1 planets. Good for entertainment, but that's about it for me. |
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-07-05 13:12 |
#20 I forgot exactly what my "score" was, but I was just below the so-called average. But if everybody was as smart as me, we'd have 4.8 more planets! And that makes just about as much sense as "if everyone used as much (fill-in-the-blank) as you do..." If frogs had wings, they'd be pigeons©. |
Posted by: Bobby 2005-07-05 13:01 |
#19 I just love it when they denote certain fields as optional (zip and e-mail) and when you decline to fill them in they say they are required. They can kiss my ass. |
Posted by: Cheaderhead 2005-07-05 12:43 |
#18 39 Acres - 8.8 Planets. There were no questions on beer consumption. If factored in I'm sure I'd need double that acreage for barley and hop production. Another 9 planets for the nectar of the God? Sounds about right. |
Posted by: BrerRabbit 2005-07-05 12:42 |
#17 3.1 Planets. Walking to works seems to be a big factor. I still say we need more planets. |
Posted by: Shipman 2005-07-05 12:37 |
#16 BH, 19 and 4.3 for me and Connie the Short Bus Lady, too. There were no questions about how many and what kind of animals a person has. Horses take a lot of land. We actually have 11.3 acres at the Deacon Blues Pork Palace, Potables Parlour, and Home for Wayward Animals and Women. I would also like to know how electricity consumption was factored in. |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2005-07-05 12:29 |
#15 Xb - ROFL!!! "We're not worthy!" [repeat ad nauseum] ;-) |
Posted by: .com 2005-07-05 12:21 |
#14 Dave D. and ed: I'm not worthy to compete against you (I only got a 6). I'm surely in the presence of greatness. |
Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-07-05 12:19 |
#13 I got a 19 and use 4.3 planets worth o' stuff. How did I, who eats meat for every meal, score lower than mucky the vegetarian? What're you driving, mucky? An Escalade? |
Posted by: BH 2005-07-05 11:36 |
#12 Guess I'm average (scored a 23, the U.S. average is 24)! Man, I need to strive more too! I don't like being average! |
Posted by: BA 2005-07-05 11:21 |
#11 29. 6.4. What am I, a friggin hippie! |
Posted by: tu3031 2005-07-05 11:16 |
#10 33 and 7.5 damn! AOS beats me again! |
Posted by: Frank G 2005-07-05 11:09 |
#9 34 and 7.6 planets. And I'm not done yet. |
Posted by: Steve White 2005-07-05 10:57 |
#8 WooHoo! 100 acres, 22.6 planets. I gotta get out and do more mudding. Now if they only had a more realistic selection for air travel. Only 100 hours a year? Pshaw. |
Posted by: ed 2005-07-05 10:49 |
#7 Odyssey 2001: "All these worlds are yours except Europa". So, I don't worry. ;-) |
Posted by: twobyfour 2005-07-05 10:46 |
#6 3.3 planets |
Posted by: raptor 2005-07-05 10:39 |
#5 Everytime I see something like this, it makes me start to wonder what hippies taste like. I mean, assuming you washed them once or twice. Seems like we could cut down on the acreage needed by processing this whackos for their meat. |
Posted by: BH 2005-07-05 10:35 |
#4 Footprint: 54 acres, 12.1 planets. And I don't give a fat rat's ass, either. |
Posted by: Dave D. 2005-07-05 10:31 |
#3 I liked the nice green background color. That was the most interesting part. 22 acres / 5 planets. Color me tickled pink, lol! |
Posted by: .com 2005-07-05 10:24 |
#2 Damn, only 5.3 planets. I'll have to talk the wife into getting that humongous SUV with the gas-guzzling V8. |
Posted by: Heynonymous 2005-07-05 10:05 |
#1 I got 41. "If everyone lived as you, we would need 9.3 planets." So, can I get a job at Haliburton? |
Posted by: Jackal 2005-07-05 09:34 |