You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Santa Monica robber killed by intended victims
2005-07-22
HT : Bill Handel KFI
SANTA MONICA, Calif. - A man who tried to rob two people at gunpoint in a fast-food restaurant drive-thru was shot and killed by one of his intended victims early Thursday, police said. The 25-year-old man died at the scene. His name was not immediately released pending notification of his family.
The victims, two men, were in the Santa Monica drive-thru shortly before 5 a.m. "when a masked suspect approached their vehicle and displayed a knife and handgun," said police Lt. Frank Fabrega.
"Gimme yer money!"
A struggle ensued, and the suspect stabbed the passenger in the hand. The driver then pulled out a handgun and shot the suspect, who fled on foot and collapsed a short distance away, Fabrega said.
"Ouch....rosebud.."
Police said the gun used to shoot the suspect belonged to the intended victim, but it was unclear whether he had a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
5am..drive-thru..SoCal..bad guy may have tried sticking up a gang banger
The incident was under investigation.
I think it is as funny as heck to have an incident like this reported by such an anti-gun person as Handel. Handel is good on the WOT, but has some liberal leanings in other areas...

Later news. Police determine it was self defense. The procecutor is trying to determine if he will file (has a chance in hell of a conviction) a misdemeanor concealed weapons charge...
Posted by:BigEd

#6   The concealed weapon charge could only be pressed if the cops actually saw it concealed. If the gun isn't registered in CA it's a crime in this state. This is LA, a DA will be stupid enough to bring charges and the guy who pulled the trigger is going to be sued for sure.

Play "The World Turned Up Side Down."

No, myself defense handgun is not registered and I don't need the "kings" permission to carry it on my person if I deem to do so. I have taken all the courses required by law but decided that the law is against my human rights. Therefore I defy it when and if I think I need to do so.

The guy did the right thing after the guy attacked. He was within his rights under California law.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-07-22 16:01  

#5  "Santa Monica robber killed by intended victims"

Works for me. :-D

Wonder if he can bill the family for the cost of the bullet? Personally, I'd consider it a donation and write it off.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-07-22 14:37  

#4  Remember that privately many liberals are bitter racists, even though they are in utter denial about it. Conservatives may be down on a particular race, but they will usually give individuals of that race the benefit of the doubt, if they appear to be "polite people". Many liberals seem incapable of treating individuals of other races as individuals, demanding that they conform to the liberals view of what they think they are. As example, for this reason, Condi Rice is not, cannot be, African-American or black. She is some thing, but she is not a negro.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-07-22 14:30  

#3  This happened in "The People's Republic of Santa Monica". The National Anthem is "Kumbaya".
Posted by: BigEd   2005-07-22 13:37  

#2  Police said the gun used to shoot the suspect belonged to the intended victim, but it was unclear whether he had a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

Who cares? The crime was stopped, and that's all that matters.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-07-22 13:32  

#1  It wasn't concealed when he pulled the trigger. I don't see the misdemeanor charge. If the perp was hit, I vote to aquit.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2005-07-22 12:55  

00:00