You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
American Aircraft Get Death Rays
2005-07-27
July 27, 2005: Quietly, and without much fanfare, the U.S. Air Force has been equipping some of its fighters with electronic ray type weapons. Not quite the “death ray” of science fiction fame, but an electronic ray type weapon none the less. In this case, the weapon uses the high-powered microwave (HPM) effects found in Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar technology. These radars have been around a long time, popular mainly for their ability deal with lots of targets simultaneously. But AESA is also able to focus a concentrated beam of radio energy that could scramble electronic components of a distant target. Sort of like the EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) put out by nuclear weapons. The air force won’t, for obvious reasons, discuss the exact “kill range” of the of the various models of AESA radars on American warplanes (the F14, F35 and F22 have them). However, it is known that “range” in this case is an elastic thing. Depending on how well the target electronics are hardened against EMP, more electrical power will be required to do damage. Moreover, the electrical power of the various AESA radars in service varies as well. The air force has said that the larger AESA radar it plans to install on its E-10 radar aircraft would be able to zap cruise missile guidance systems up to 180 kilometers away. The E-10 AESA is several times larger than the one in the F35 (the largest in use now), so make your own estimates.
Posted by:Steve

#11  you can't see a laser when its fireded ,dang diggity!!
Posted by: playertwo   2005-07-27 23:02  

#10  tease
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-27 19:59  

#9  Is that a Rivet Joint, Duct Tape Epinage?
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-27 19:46  

#8  It has been alleged at Indymedia that a number of recent West Texas car wrecks were in fact live fire tests of airborne energy weapons. It has been noted that such sinister aircraft as the B-1B, E-6A Hermes, and KC-135 are seen regularly around the Lubbock airport and that these may be zapping unsuspecting motorists as a kind of field trial.
The stupid Indymediots have not even noticed the new and rather odd antenna array on my Cessna 182.

BUWAHAHA!
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-07-27 19:27  

#7  This is cool, but let's hope Clinton and the Dems didn't trade this to the ChiComs for campaign contributions.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-07-27 14:11  

#6  There is an old tale from the Vietnam War about an NVA land-based radar system, that when activated for the first time, unintentionally "pinged" one of our aircraft carriers off the coast. They responded by turning on their radar pointed at the NVA source, which instantly shut down; our technicians suspecting so violently, that "their console blew up". The aircraft carrier people then guessed that they thought the problem was on their end, as they repaired then fired it up twice more, at several days' intervals, just to get the same response from the aircraft carrier, much to the amusement...
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-07-27 14:02  

#5  I've always maintained that the SM2/3 missle system was just a cover for the Aegis main kill system it's radar.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-27 13:00  

#4  They meant F15. Some of the F15Cs are getting the ASEA radar upgrades. Also a 100KW infrared laser is being developed for some F35s (in place of the lift fan and powered by the engine) for both air-air and air-ground.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-27 11:57  

#3  I've been suspicious why the US has suddenly started to downplay manned fighter aircraft, along with a strong emphasis on UAVs. Very high speed and high maneuverability UAVs with energy weapons capable of taking down enemy aircraft, sam, cruise, a2a, and maybe even ballistic missiles really change the tactical situation. But then other factors come into play, such as, can they be used against ground targets? Can they be used against 'stupid' weapons, like unguided rockets? How effective are their own countermeasures against similar air and ground based weapons? Can the enemy shield against it? Are there parallel energy weapons that can be deployed in tandem (on different airframes) with them, for complementary purposes? And I'm sure a whole bunch more questions I haven't thought up.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-07-27 11:54  

#2  I did not think the F-14 was still in service.
Posted by: Domingo   2005-07-27 11:44  

#1  Let me introduce you to my giant "la-zer".
Posted by: Dr. Evil   2005-07-27 11:37  

00:00