You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Iraqi Insurgents Counter-Attack Against Operation
2005-07-28
From Jihad Unspun
.... the Iraqi Resistance had mounted four various attacks on the attacking US forces in the area [Amiriyat al-Fallujah, just south of the city , forcing them to dig in and take cover inside schools and government office buildings. .... at 10am Tuesday morning a bomb exploded [near]by a US patrol that was trying to close the road known as the al-Bu ‘Isa Road to prevent the people of Fallujah from entering or leaving the city by that route. The blast destroyed a Humvee and reportedly left three American soldiers dead and a fourth wounded. As the “Gnawing Rats” operation continues, the al-Bu ‘Isa Road remained closed on Wednesday ....

The second and third attacks coincided with the arrival of US forces in the environs of Fallujah coming from the area of ‘Amiriyat al-Fallujah. Four Resistance rockets blasted into the Buzaybiz area, an open area in which the US forces were gathering at 12 noon Tuesday. Then at 3pm Tuesday seven powerful Grad rockets slammed into the same area, killing or wounding 13 US Marines, according to a source in the Iraqi puppet army.

During Tuesday-Wednesday night a martyrdom fighter drove an explosives-laden car into the area at the crossroads of the cities of ‘Amiriyat al-Fallujah and al-Habbaniyah near the cemetery of the martyrs of al-Qadisiyah, destroying two Humvees and reportedly killing or wounding a number of US troops.

Iraqi Resistance forces fired seven heavy 120mm mortar rounds at a concentration of US troops in ‘Amiriyat al-Fallujah at 8:45pm local time Wednesday night .... About 15 minutes after the attack on the Americans concentrated in ‘Amiriyat al-Fallujah, the Resistance fired seven more 120mm mortar rounds into the facility for military production now called al-‘Amir Facility, but known as the Saddam Facility for Military Production prior to the American occupation. US forces occupied that facility, also located in ‘Amiriyat al-Fallujah, about two months ago and turned it into a camp. ...
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#43  War on Iraq is an act of treason against United States.
Posted by: Tholuns Shomogum7813   2005-07-28 09:43  

#42  Truth will set you free.
Posted by: Ulomonter Thaviter6771   2005-07-28 09:30  

#41  Well, not nobody. Al-Arabiya TV wanted him as a commentator for his uncannily accurate predictions.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-28 21:24  

#40  He had his own fan website, with t-shirts and all, and when he went to surrender, nobody wanted him. He looks the part too. Hilarious.
Posted by: Rafael   2005-07-28 21:12  

#39  guesn their wuz mor to it:

"Their infidels are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad. Be assured, Baghdad is safe, protected."

"Today I have visited whole Baghdad city, no invaders found. You go and see how we have ousted them from this city. They are cying outside and waiting to receive bullets. They will be killed shortly."

"These images are not the suburbs of Baghdad. From what I glimpsed, these gardens with rows of palm trees on the side, which you saw in the images, are located in the south of Abu Ghreib, where we have surrounded the Americans and British."
Posted by: muck4doo   2005-07-28 16:07  

#38  their we go:

"I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that they have
started to commit suicide under the walls of Baghdad. We
will encourage them to commit more suicides quickly."
Posted by: muck4doo   2005-07-28 16:03  

#37  A laugh riot

EP
Posted by: ElvisHasLeftTheBuilding   2005-07-28 16:01  

#36  There was something about the "gates of Baghdad" too, that was hilarious.
Posted by: Rafael   2005-07-28 16:00  

#35  my favrit wuz wen he saisd our troops were linen up to comit sooiside rathere then fasen teh iraqi forses
Posted by: muck4doo   2005-07-28 15:51  

#34  Old Spook
Here are som classics from Baghdad Bob...

The Collected Quotations of "Baghdad Bob," Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf: The Iraqi Minister of DisInformation

Mocking the Coalition's Attempt To Target Saddam Hussein:


Attempting to Acknowledge What Was Happening Militarily Beyond Baghdad:
March 22, 2003
"Maybe they will enter Umm Qasr and Basra, but how will they enter Baghdad? It will be a big oven for them. They can penetrate our borders but they cannot reach Baghdad. They will try to pull our army and troops out but we are well aware of their plans and they will fail."

March 23, 2003
"In Umm Qasr, the fighting is fierce and we have inflicted many damages. The stupid enemy, the Americans and British, failed completely. They're not making any penetration."

As Televised Reports of U.S. Forces Approaching the Outskirts of Western Baghdad Are Shown:
"They are not any place. They are on the move everywhere. They are a snake moving in the desert. They hold no place in Iraq. This is an illusion."

After U.S. Forces Seized Baghdad's Airport:
"We butchered the force present at the airport. We have retaken the airport! There are no Americans there!"

After U.S. Troops Penetrated Central Baghdad:
April 5, 2003
"Nobody came here. Those America losers, I think their repeated frequent lies are bringing them down very rapidly.... Baghdad is secure, is safe."

April 5, 2003
"They are not near Baghdad. Don't believe them.... They said they entered with... tanks in the middle of the capital. They claim that they - I tell you, I... that this speech is too far from the reality. It is a part of this sickness of their plan. There is no an... - no any existence to the American troops or for the troops in Baghdad at all."

April 6, 2003
"Whenever we attack, they retreat. When we pound them with missiles and heavy artillery, they retreat even deeper. But when we stopped pounding, they pushed to the airport for propaganda purposes."

April 7, 2003
"The Americans are not there. They're not in Baghdad. There are no troops there. Never. They're not at all."

April 7, 2003
"U.S. forces learned a lesson last night they will never forget. We slaughtered them and will continue to slaughter them."

April 7, 2003
"There is no presence of American infidels in the city of Baghdad."

With Media Pictures of U.S. Troops Being Shown Standing Under the Giant Crossed Swords in Saddam's Favorite Parade Grounds in Baghdad, While Giving a Press Briefing Around the Corner:
"There you can see, there is nothing going on."

After U.S. Missiles Destroyed His Office in the Information Ministry and He was Forced to Give Press Briefings on the Street:
"They will be burnt. We are going to tackle them."

Disputing His Own Assertions of No Coalition Troops in Baghdad:
"We blocked them inside the city. Their rear is blocked.... They pushed a few of their armored carriers and some tanks with their soldiers. We besieged them and I think we will finish them soon."

While American Soldiers Are Showering in Saddam's Bathroom Nearby Presidential Palace:
"We have killed most of the [coalition] infidels, and I think we will finish off the rest soon."

After Being Shown Footage of Iraqi Soldiers Surrendering:
"Those are not Iraqi soldiers at all."

April 7, 2003
"This invasion will end in failure."

April 8, 2003
"Baghdad Bob" disappeared, perhaps forever. On the other hand, perhaps he will return as Minister of Information for France or be awarded a drive time show on the new liberal talk radio network.
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2005-07-28 15:35  

#33  I want to be able to say.... Jeeezus jim jim, I already ready about this in the J G!. Trash it!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-28 15:16  

#32  Steve get it all... at least the headlines. It'll remove temptation.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-28 15:15  

#31  Perhaps it it time to do "Tales from the Jihad Gazette". Just have to look for the right material, I do have standards to live down to.
Posted by: Steve   2005-07-28 13:57  

#30  Your wish is our command, OS.
Posted by: rkb   2005-07-28 13:55  

#29  I *like* the Crossfire Gazette. Reminds me of reading Dick Tracy in the comics on Sunday with Dad. JU, however, is as dull and plodding as anything Karl Marx ever wrote.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-07-28 13:40  

#28  MODS - or .com...

PLEEEEEASE get a picture of Baghdad Bob to post as the graphic at the top of EVERY JU post, no matter who puts it up here. This stuff from JU is of the same quality and truth as ol Baghdada Bob's stuff.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-07-28 13:06  

#27  WhiteCollarRedneck -- it's also because the Crossfire Gazette is about thieves and murderers getting justice. Rough and ready justice, admittedly, but justice all the same. Quite a few of those articles have had bits about the locals being relieved and happy that someone got caught in a "crossfire".

The Jihad Unspun claims, though, are from evil men claiming to have killed American soldiers trying to rebuild a nation crushed by tyranny and bloodied by terrorists. And for all their claims of attacking American soldiers, we know they're more likely to be killing ordinary Iraqis trying to get through their lives.

Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-28 13:02  

#26  Ya know, the Crossfire Gazette is totally repetitive yet I laugh at every single issue. This Jihad Unspun crap is totally repetitive, and I haven't had a laugh in weeks. Maybe it's because the Gazette has hilarious editorial commentary, and this has no commentary at all?
Posted by: WhiteCollarRedneck   2005-07-28 12:53  

#25  Dear F.B.I. - I admit freely that I have visited the JU site from time to time, but only from an upstanding site like Rantburg, just to verify the posting was accurate.

But I don't have any Ossama videos. Anymore.
Posted by: Abu Musab al Dopey   2005-07-28 12:49  

#24  Mike, you keep posting this nonsense from J.U.
You do know that this site is suspected to be a CIA trap?
Some Web watchers.... believe the U.S. government may be using the Internet jihad to spy. They speculate that Jihad Unspun, an English-language site that appears to promote terror, may be a CIA creation, designed to find out who visits or orders videos glorifying bin Laden.
As often as you visit, the CIA must have "your number" by now. Maybe you'll get a visit from Valerie, the deep cover agent.
Posted by: GK   2005-07-28 11:15  

#23  I think Mike has said before that he posts the JU stuff as humor. I don't think he's one of their fellow travellers at all, and I think we're accusing him falsely. He has the LE mentality for dealing with terrorism, which many here reject, but he's not a fellow traveller.

If I had more time at night, I'd post JU stuff with all the appropriately snarky, salmon-colored commentary. I just don't have the time.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-07-28 11:14  

#22  The only reason I look at Jihad Unspun is so I don't have to patronize the Boston Globe and I can still read Derrick Z. Jackson's insane blubbering columns.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-07-28 11:05  

#21  They are funny, but that's not Mikey's intent. I'll listen if he sez otherwise.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-28 10:38  

#20  The JU posts are actually funny. I always think of some rat-ass jihadi reading this and praising allen. It always brings chuckle.
Posted by: Brett   2005-07-28 10:34  

#19  I think most of us would not object about an article of JU say, once a month for a laugh. But that we are sick of having to ciope with such tripe day after day.
Posted by: JFM   2005-07-28 10:22  

#18  Don't make me have to setup another detail under your bed to monitor your bed wetting TS. Or should I say, Boris?
Posted by: The Mossad   2005-07-28 10:08  

#17  Had the friendly fire claims adjuster on the other line.
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-07-28 10:01  

#16  whew ... I wondered LOL
Posted by: too true   2005-07-28 09:54  

#15  T boy = Tholuns Shomogum7813


not too true RB.
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-07-28 09:46  

#14  Anyone notice that the return of a Boris clone coincided with Mikey's return?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-28 09:45  

#13  stfu t boy.
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-07-28 09:44  

#12  I keep telling you -- it's all a Halliburton / Cheney plot. See, they're using the bodies of all those dead troops for experiments into alternate fuels and then using computer simulations to fake emails, sat phone conversations and streaming video with the families back home.

Gets tougher when the units rotate home ... then they have to activate the clones or go whack the families so noone realizes that all those troops are actually dead. Cause it LOOKS as if they're alive all right ....

Fiendish. I wonder if it was Rove's idea or if Robe is Cheney's understudy?
Posted by: too true   2005-07-28 09:44  

#11  He forgot this part - The correspondent reported that it was impossible to assess the extent of losses incurred by the Americans in the two attacks since US troops were shooting at anyone approaching them.

Which is why I have a hard time with the fact that these Lions of Islam are able to accurately count dead and/or wounded. Unless it's The Little Big Horn*, attackers don't get to count the dead/wounded.

*Or, if you prefer, General George Armstrong Custer's Last Stand, in 1878 - more or less.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-28 09:43  

#10  Gotta wonder when Mikey's going to go into full-froth mode.

Maybe when Benon Sevan(sp?) is finally indicted?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-28 09:41  

#9  No he's not slipping, he know's he is losing.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-07-28 09:32  

#8  MS forgot to bold the casualty numbers. He's slipping.
Posted by: eLarson   2005-07-28 09:20  

#7  Mike, do us all a little favor and if you must post this sort of crap at least make the effort to go out and find some of the more novel material. There's no shortage out there. Try. After two "reports" JU reads like the same mind-numbing, fatally boring, children's book heard for the 1000th time.
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-07-28 09:17  

#6  Hey, Red Dog, is this what you mean?
LINK
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2005-07-28 09:13  

#5  Centcom Casualty report is here.

Strange Mikey how your mouthpiece's events and numbers don't match. Now in an open society where troops and family have open access and communication, you'd know if our government was cooking the books. So your little exercise in Sedition during Time of War, seems so .... desperate.
Posted by: Glater Uninter1262   2005-07-28 09:07  

#4  Did someone mention "Gnawing Rats".



/lets wack the rat.
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-07-28 09:05  

#3  Enough with the JU bullsh*t. Bandwidth-wasting enemy propaganda.
Posted by: Spot   2005-07-28 08:58  

#2  Frankly it's diffcult to ignore these numbers, 7x13 is equavalent to 70 plus 21. One is the age of death, the other the age of majority. Together they add up to 91 which is 19 revereed. 91 Is also the number of PAGES CUT FROM THE WARREN COMMISSION.
Posted by: Jack Rubenstein   2005-07-28 08:52  

#1  More JU nonsense. Kinda curious how they where firing all their weapons in volleys of seven though with a resultant casualty count of thirteen. JU just cannot hide it's fascination with numerology.
Posted by: TomAnon   2005-07-28 08:39  

00:00