| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq-Jordan |
| The Belmont Club: All ye know on earth, and all ye need to know |
| 2005-08-02 |
| This is not good. Read it. ... (Speculation alert) It hints at the strategic decisions America has taken, not always with success. Direct attacks on Syria may have been vetoed in favor of efforts to detach the insurgency from its Syrian rear, such as Operation Matador. The US apparently continues to build a workable Iraqi unitary state despite the temptation to unleash the Shi'ites on the Sunnis. ('Although civil war would be a tragedy, with immense costs, it would at least force a definitive outcome to the ongoing struggle in Iraq.' -- Keane) America tries not to tar Islam, or even certain sects of Islam, with the brush of terrorism, despite open incitements in mosques. ('anti-sedition laws should be passed so that those who incite violence in mosques and schools can be held accountable.' -- West). Yet the Iraqi operation is adjudged winnable despite these limitations. ('Indeed, if the United States withdraws from Iraq before the ISF is capable of sustaining itself, it would lose there as well. That, however, is not likely to happen.' -- Keane. 'Despite the many obstacles, victory is achievable.' -- West. 'Once people are in the voting booths, the insurgents will not be able to prevent them from voting their conscience.' -- White). But what sort of victory would it be? Perhaps a shadow victory like that achieved in Korea 60 years ago. A Syria belligerent but not really; Islam still the 'religion of peace' -- whenever it is not inciting attacks against America; Bin Laden in Pakistan but only when he is actually spotted; an Iran with nuclear weapons which they will be bribed not to use. A West partially mobilized against enemies it cannot bring itself to name or destroy, a display of aggression from the civilized herd to prevent further attack from the circling pack of predators serving in lieu. Iraq dozing in an uneasy peace. An act of faith really; faith that things will work out if only we can keep the world spinning on its axis. |
| Posted by:3dc |
| #5 And Winston Churchill who said "One can always count on America to do the right thing...after they have exhausted all other options." |
| Posted by: Michael 2005-08-02 18:35 |
| #4 Wisdom personified, as always, Mrs. D. :-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2005-08-02 18:14 |
| #3 Why we don't make controling the Iraqi borders our top priority is beyond me. I don't have any secret knowledge, but how about, we don't have the manpower? War is a political act. So it should be politically correct. That you and I don't happen to like the prevalent politics at the moment is unfortunate for us, but that's what Bush has to work with. I am becoming fairly sure that the way we make war is a lot like the way we do business and make laws and sausages. It's pretty messy to watch, the waste and mistakes are more apparent than the succeses, it's hard to see where there's any organization or direction, but through the power of the invisible hand, everything turns out OK. Bismark is reputed to have said God watches out for children, drunks and the United States of America. I think this may have been what he meant. Korea is mentioned. That was a fairly hot battle in what was usually called the cold war. Remind me how that one turned out? We can keep this up longer than they can. Much longer. |
| Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2005-08-02 15:51 |
| #2 The 150,000 number isn't as bad as it sounds. It includes large numbers of criminal gangmembers. They are responsible for approx. half of the murders in Iraq. The real issue is the foreign support. Why we don't make controling the Iraqi borders our top priority is beyond me. Al |
| Posted by: Frozen Al 2005-08-02 14:45 |
| #1 Of course, he's right. We are doing another politically correct war (or, is it not "war" anymore). This shit is going to get us killed. |
| Posted by: Captain America 2005-08-02 14:01 |