You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Sort of Guarding the U.S. ICBM Force
2005-08-05
August 5, 2005: The U.S. ground-based ICBM fleet covers an area of over 114,000 square kilometers – about the size of the state of Pennsylvania, and distributed across the Western United States. Current inventory includes 500 silos for Minuteman III missiles. The last of the 50 Peacekeeper silos and their launch facilities are in the process of being sealed up, with the final Peacekeeper missile scheduled to be removed from alert status on September 19.

One of the dirty little secrets of the ICBM force is that the government doesn't actually own and control all of the land the silos reside on. The majority of missile fields are on privately owned ranches, with silos and launch facilities having a 15 meter easement around them. Air Force personnel manning the silos travel a cumulative 19 million miles per year to get from bases to the launch facilities, often through snow, on gravel roads, because the locations are so remote.
I used to maintain the cameras in the entry ports in the Titan silos around McConnel AFB. Trip to the most distant one was 90 miles one way, if I remember correctly. Nice road trip in good weather, winter sucked.
Currently, half the 9,600 people in the U.S. Air Force ICBM force are dedicated to security, conducting such duties as patrols around the missile fields and stationary guards at silos and launch control facilities. Often, security forces can get called out as many as three times per day for alarms or incidents that require a manned response team to check things over. Currently, missile silos are protected by barbed wire fences and motion sensors, but the Air Force wants to add remote cameras. The motion sensors are so sensitive that a rabbit or tumbleweed often triggers off an alert, requiring a response team to go out and "eyeball" the cause of the alarm. A camera system would drastically cut down on false alarm calls. The Air Force would like to get funding for the cameras in the 2007 budget.
WTF? They still don't have freaking cameras topside?
The Air Force also wants to upgrade the helicopter fleet that carries around security personnel. An elderly fleet of 62 UH-1N Hueys currently move response teams around, but the first helicopters entered into service in 1970.
They're still using those same birds as when I was working? They were old then, leftovers from Vietnam.
The Hueys don't have the range or speed the Air Force wants; for example a Huey can't cross the ICBM facilities at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana without refueling. The Huey has a range of around 480 kilometers and a cruising speed of around 180 kilometers per hour. Replacement candidates include the Lockheed Martin/AgustaWestland/Bell US101, Sikorsky S-92 and the Northrop Grumman/EADS NH90.
Posted by:Steve

#3  Ah the MX was indeed a great program I hope that whatever 4th gen ICBM they decide to build at least meets the standards the MX had when it was deployed.
Posted by: Valentine   2005-08-05 21:27  

#2  One of the annoying reasons for taking the MX's offline is because they don't break enough. They do not provide enough hands-on repair time for the maintenance types at the depots. The Minutemen do. So there is a practical angle to it, along with a vested interest 'got to keep the jobs' angle. Kind of sad, but then, they did fully serve their secondary purpose - breaking the bank of the USSR.

These were my babies. I am sorry to see them go.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2005-08-05 19:48  

#1  Yipes! I didn't realize the PeaceKeepers were being taken down so soon. Apologies to whoever sed bring back the MX yesterday, knew what he was talking about.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-08-05 16:43  

00:00