You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
South Africa offers uranium to Iran
2005-08-11
EFL, I hope. Why does Preview never work for Me before about 0800? No wonder I lose out to the AoS so often.

The United Nations’ nuclear watchdog Yeah, a little red watchdog, with a bushy tail and chicken feathers on his whiskers is set to vote on a request for a detailed report on Iran’s non-proliferation safeguards by September 3.

A new draft resolution to the International Atomic Energy Authority requests that the organisation’s director general, Mohamed El-Baradei, report on Iran’s implementation of agreed non-proliferation safeguards in three weeks’ time. Request denied. Carry on, Iran.

The new draft resolution, due to be debated at the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday, held back from demanding that Iran be referred to the UN Security Council, which has the power to impose minor nuisance crippling sanctions on Iran.

On Wednesday an IAEA emergency board meeting adjourned without agreement on a resolution that would call on Iran to reinstate the suspension of its nuclear work. The resolution, drafted by Western nations, ran into opposition from terrorist-supporting developing countries.

Earlier South Africa proposed a giveawaycompromise to break the diplomatic crisis over Iran's nuclear programme, after Tehran on Wednesday removed United Nations seals from a uranium conversion facility in order to resume work on producing nuclear fuel.

Diplomats said Thabo Mbeki, South African president, was involved in pushing the interim compromise. Two weeks ago he met Hassan Rowhani, who was then Iran's chief negotiator, to discuss a proposal that would involve shipping South African uranium yellowcake to Iran for conversion into uranium hexafluoride gas. This would be returned to South Africa to be enriched into nuclear fuel. SA officials will express "surprise" at the poor quality of the UF6: "There's hardly any U-235 in here at all."

The EU-3 group of France, Germany and the UK accused Iran of “flagrant disregard” of its November 2004 agreement voluntarily to suspend its nuclear fuel cycle development. There would be no further talks until Iran resumed that suspension, a UK official said.

The EU-3 and the US intend to push ahead with another IAEA resolution in September that would try to refer Iran to the UN Security Council and Chinese veto if there were no change by then. An Iranian official said it would go to the next stage and restart uranium enrichment at its Natanz facility GPS coordinates? if it was taken to the council.
Posted by:Jackal

#4  Nukes = Muzzy Viagra©

Watch it there, Bobby, yer gettin' pretty close to in fringement, heh. Since you also copyright all of your spiffy verbalisms, you understand, I'm sure, heh. ;-)
Posted by: .com   2005-08-11 15:11  

#3  Right. And "whatever they want" is to have the bomb, so they feel powerful and potent.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-08-11 15:04  

#2  Nope, Comment #1 - you are wrong. What you say may be right about NKor. Not Iran. They just want nukes and will do what it takes until they have them, o r they are stopped by military means..
Posted by: Glereper Craviter7929   2005-08-11 14:39  

#1  We're gonna do whatever we want, unless we can suck some more concessions out of you before we do whatever we want anyway.

Got it?
Posted by: Bobby   2005-08-11 12:32  

00:00