| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Able Danger: What We Know, What We Don't Know |
| 2005-08-12 |
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #6 amen |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-08-12 22:47 |
| #5 I want to hear from the men of Able Danger. I care not to hear from any congressmen (or women), staffers, Commission members, journalists or pundits. Subpoena them and let them speak. All other talking heads and usual suspects can shut their piehole. Starting now. Able Danger, where are you? Tell us. Don't let them do it for you. |
| Posted by: USMC_Vet 2005-08-12 22:27 |
| #4 Heh. I think you're right... |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2005-08-12 19:36 |
| #3 will get a plum assignment in her administration. I'd bet a more likely gift will be a subpoena if Weldon keeps it up, and he will.... |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-08-12 19:23 |
| #2 Listening to Rush to day about Able Danger, it appears the no Looney Left Democrats are pretty upset that their president let them down. 911 Commission was an CYA maneuver and as one Demorat put it today on the radio someone should hang |
| Posted by: Long Hair Republican 2005-08-12 19:15 |
| #1 Good article. My hunch is that the spectulation at the end will eventually become fact: Committee staff witheld the Able Danger revelations from key committee members, and therefore from the Committee's report, to protect that all-important Clinton Legacy-- and not screw up Hillary's chances at becoming President. If she does, of course, you can bet the bank that each and every one of those staffers who participated in keeping Able Danger away from the Committee's eyes will get a plum assignment in her administration. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2005-08-12 19:02 |