Submit your comments on this article | |
Iraq-Jordan | |
Iraqis Fail to Agree on Constitution | |
2005-08-16 | |
![]() The delay was a strong rebuff of the Bush administration's insistence that the deadline be met, even if some issues were unresolved, to maintain political momentum and blunt Iraq's deadly insurgency. "We should not be hasty regarding the issues and the constitution should not be born crippled," said Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a Shiite, after the parliament session, which lasted a bare 15 minutes. "We are keen to have an early constitution, but the constitution should be completed in all of its items." Al-Jaafari's statement came after an apparent deal late Monday on all but two key issues fell apart, according to several Shiite politicians. The Shiites said the unresolved issues were women's rights, which is inextricably tied to Islam's role, and the right of Kurds to eventually secede from the country. But al-Jaafari said the key stumbling blocks were distribution of oil wealth and federalism, another, broader way of stating the Kurdish autonomy issue. The confusion over outstanding issues — as well as negotiators' seeming inability to agree even on what they disagreed on — left unclear whether they will now reopen talks on all issues or just focus on a few.
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#8 By the way, how's that European Constitution coming, humm? |
Posted by: Steve 2005-08-16 12:34 |
#7 Yep, but they didn't have to deal with the likes of Mookie Al-Sadr and his Iranian pals. Canada back then, like today, just didn't pose much of a threat. Now as for them injuns .... |
Posted by: The Angry Fliegerabwehrkanonen 2005-08-16 08:07 |
#6 To state that it took 13 years for the Constitution to be approved is misrepresenting what happened. From 1776 to 1783, the Revolutionary War was fought. Then the Articles of Confederation acted as a treaty binding the 13 new sovereign states. Only when it was realized that the 13 states needed tighter coordination, primarily economic, that the Constitutional Convention was convened. Even then, most attendees thought it was to ammend the Articles of Confederation, not to replace it and create a new nation. |
Posted by: ed 2005-08-16 07:52 |
#5 Ed, you're forgetting the delay between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitutional Convention. Sure, we had the Articles of Confederation, but we realized those weren't working and replaced them. No reason the Iraqis couldn't do the same. |
Posted by: Robert Crawford 2005-08-16 07:30 |
#4 [sarcasm/ON] But there was a deadline! A deadline can't be broken! If you're late everything's a failure! Quagmire! Quagmire! Quag-URK-...rosebud...*THUD* [sarcasm/OFF] Mike |
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2005-08-16 07:29 |
#3 But it took 13 years to get there,Ed.That is the point(I think)VAM was trying to make. |
Posted by: raptor 2005-08-16 07:24 |
#2 US Constitution timeline: 1787/05/25 - Constitutional Convention opens 1787/09/17 - Final draft of the Constitution signed 3 months, 23 days from convention to final draft approval. 1787/12/07 - 1st state (DE) ratifies 1790/05/29 - 13th state (RI) ratifies |
Posted by: ed 2005-08-16 07:19 |
#1 It was 13 years from Declaration of Independence to Constitution, and that was without ratbastards blowing random people up on the streets. A week isn't a big deal. |
Posted by: VAMark 2005-08-16 01:51 |