You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australian Wool vs P.E.T.A
2005-08-23
A powerful group of American fashion chains, including Gap Inc, has thrown its support behind a proposal to end the war between US animal rights activists and Australian wool groups. The retailers, with combined annual sales of more than $US25 billion ($A33 billion), have urged two influential Australian wool groups who refuse to accept the peace deal to support the plan. "It is an extremely powerful group of retailers," People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) campaign co-ordinator Matt Rice told AAP.

The plan agreed to by PETA and the Australian Wool Growers Association (AWGA) and supported by the US retailers would lead to the gradual phasing out of mulesing in Australia by 2010. Mulesing is the controversial rear end skin stripping procedure that Australian farmers use on sheep to protect them from maggot infestation. The plan also proposes a new "non-mulesed" label on clothing to clearly inform shoppers the wool in an item did not come from a mulesed sheep.

The PETA-AWGA proposal would also lead to more humane treatment of Australian sheep exported live to other countries, particularly the Middle East.

While the AWGA supports the plan, two other wool grower representative groups, Australian Wool Innovation and the Australian Sheep and Wool Industry Taskforce, have heavily criticised it and refused to accept the plan. PETA hopes the support of the major retailers will sway Australian wool farmers to support the proposal it has put forward.

The major retailers are: Gap Inc, Liz Claiborne, Lands End, LL Bean, Eddie Bauer, Jones Apparel Group and yuppie slut clothier Ann Taylor. The retailers are found in most North American shopping malls.

They signed a letter sent to the Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) and the Australian Sheep and Wool Industry Taskforce by the global retailer organisation, the Business for Social Responsibility. The letter urges the two wool groups to embrace the PETA-AWGA proposal. Last week, three other international fashion retailers, Talbots, Nordstrom and H&M, pledged to support the PETA-AWGA agreement.
Posted by:Oztralian [AKA] God Save The World

#8  Why is PETA so concerned about there being plenty of skin (and I suppose fur) around a sheep's anus and vagina?

Oh... I seee....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-08-23 23:27  

#7  I'm having trouble with my PETA mulesing.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-08-23 23:14  

#6  yeah, but whoya gonna find that'll volunteer to shave a PETA members anal/genital region? Convicted prisoners?
Posted by: Frank G   2005-08-23 23:12  

#5  I have a proposal. For every sheep that dies from maggot infestation, one PETA member gets to die the same way. I feel this is an equitable solution that the farmers would find agreeable and fair to all sides.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2005-08-23 23:09  

#4  Maybe I'm missing something here, but is it any less cruel to let a sheep get eaten from the inside out by maggots?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-08-23 22:39  

#3  Redneck Jim I agree with you.
Too bad these PETA types couldn't channel their energy in doing something more useful.
Posted by: Jan   2005-08-23 15:54  

#2  I looked up "Mulesing" essentialy it's removing a strip of wool bearing folded skin around the anus and vagina area so the sheep do not die of maggot infestation.

This is a perfect PETA bullshit "Cause" poorly thought out, and very detrimental to the very sheep they claim to be "Helping"

In short, it's more harmful to the sheep to NOT remove the strip of wool bearing skin.

Having it PETA's way will cause sheep to die painfuly of maggots in the ass area.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2005-08-23 11:26  

#1  cows talk, horses talk, sheep lie!
Posted by: bk   2005-08-23 10:48  

00:00