| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine |
| Palestinians fight move to declare Gaza occupation over |
| 2005-08-26 |
| Has a whinier bunch of people ever existed on this planet? GAZA CITY (AFP) - The Palestinians intend to oppose any move by Israel to have the UN Security Council declare its 38-year occupation of the Gaza Strip over following the withdrawal of all Jewish settlers. Foreign minister Nasser al-Qidwa said Israel's continued control of Gaza's air space and territorial waters meant any such move would be premature and should await a comprehensive peace agreement."The international community must maintain the Palestinian territories' current legal status after the unilateral Israeli withdrawal," said Qidwa, who travelled to Moscow this week to put his case to one of the five permanent members with veto powers on the Security Council. What is their "current legal status"? Victim? Money pit? High investment, low return? The minister charged with liaison with Israel over the pullout, Mohammed Dahlan, echoed Qidwa's comments. "Gaza will remain under the control of the occupier, who will continue to weigh heavily on our lives through control of border crossings, air space and territorial waters," he said. ...and don't you forget it, Mo. Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom told a Kuwaiti daily last week that he planned to ask the Security Council to declare the occupation of Gaza over and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is to address the UN General Assembly next month as part of Israeli efforts to improve its standing with the world body. Yeah, sure. Good luck with that, Ari. Any move to change Gaza's status would be a sharp shift away from the provisions of the 1993 Oslo accords which foresaw the Palestinian territories' occupied status being maintained right up to a full peace treaty. Both international and Israeli courts have accepted the occupied status of the Palestinian territories in a series of decisions, most recently on Israel's West Bank separation barrier, which in places juts far into the territory. Palestinian human rights activists also argued that Israel's evacuation of Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip fell far short of an end to occupation. "The Israeli withdrawal ought to have marked the end of military occupation and the lifting of the grip on land and people but this isn't the case," said the head of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, Raji al-Surani. "Israel is going to preserve its powers to intervene in Gaza and its control of land, sea and air borders," Surani told AFP. ...and the money quote. Palestinian rights lawyer Yunis al-Jaru went further, warning that any change in Gaza's status would absolve Israel of its legal responsibilities for the welfare of the territory's population. "Proclaiming the end of the Israeli occupation of Gaza would enable Israel to shake off its responsibilities, which require it to protect people under occupation and cater for their basic needs in health, education and food," said Jaru who heads the organization Conscience. Here's an idea. GET OFF YOUR LAZY, LEECHING PALI ASSES AND DO IT YOURSELVES!!! FOR ONCE!!! "In the current circumstances, this would create a serious precedent both for the Palestinian question and international law."Gaza will be totally cut off from Israel -- and we won't shed many tears over that -- but it will also be cut off from the West Bank including east Jerusalem politically, socially and economically, and there lies the nub of the problem." Jaru predicted that Israel would continue to use the threat of its military might to prevent the Palestinians developing normal communications links for the territory, such as a fully functioning port and airport. "The Palestinians of Gaza will only be able to take the plane to Cairo more than 450 kilometres (280 miles) away and will only be able to import or export foods through the Egyptian ports of Damietta and Port Said" more than 300 kilometres (200 miles) away. "To say that Gaza was free would be a mystification without precedent in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It would allow Ariel Sharon... to transform a military disengagent into an end to occupied status. "Israeli disengagement is going to strangle Gaza. Residents will no longer be able to use Ashdod port or Tel Aviv airport and will no longer be allowed to enter Israel to work," Jaru said. Be careful what you wish for, Jaru. Words to live by... "Gaza is going to be one big prison with 66 percent of its working age population unemployed and 81 percent living below the poverty line." Good. They earned it. It's about all they've ever earned. |
| Posted by:tu3031 |
| #7 If the Paleos whine within their own ghetto does anyone hear it? I don't.... turn up the music, please |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-08-26 23:09 |
| #6 Well did Hamas win, and drive the Israelis from Gasa? Then pony up your own infrastructure and utilities. ONLY if the Joooooos left of their own free will can you POSSIBLY claim any sort of "you can't just run away and leave us alone" stuff. So, what is it? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2005-08-26 21:51 |
| #5 Palestinian rights lawyer Yunis al-Jaru went further, warning that any change in Gaza's status would absolve Israel of its legal responsibilities for the welfare of the territory's population. Well yeah.... They want it both ways, suckers. |
| Posted by: Jan 2005-08-26 21:01 |
| #4 Tell them they have complete autonomy. Tell them if there is ONE attack on Israel, it gets taken from them. Let them have complete autonomy UNTIL there is ONE attack on Israel. I know where I'd put my money |
| Posted by: PlanetDan 2005-08-26 19:22 |
| #3 I trust that Sharon won't show himself as bigger moron, in my book, by still giving welfare to the Paleo's. I didn't agree with the pullout. Now that it's happend, turn off the water, electricity, etc. NOW!!!! |
| Posted by: Poison Reverse 2005-08-26 15:28 |
| #2 Talk about perpetual victims... |
| Posted by: Raj 2005-08-26 15:10 |
| #1 Jaru predicted that Israel would continue to use the threat of its military might to prevent the Palestinians developing normal communications links for the territory, such as a fully functioning port and airport. Tough shit, boys. As long as terrorism is priority #1 in your pointy little heads, the Jews are more than justified in brandishing their Big Club. Personally, I hope they get to use it someday. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-08-26 14:49 |