You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Lawyer says imams can clear his client, Umer Hyatt
2005-08-29
Must be the legal version of the Hail Mary pass (or Hail Alan?)
The attorney for a Northern California man charged with lying to the FBI about terrorist training in Pakistan says the government is deporting two Islamic religious leaders who could help clear his client.

Umer Hyatt, 47, is a naturalized U.S. citizen of Pakistani origin who lives in Lodi, Calif., near Sacramento. Mr. Hyatt and his son, Hamid Hyatt, 22, were arrested in June. Both face charges of lying to the FBI about the son's reported attendance at a terrorist training camp near the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. Both men were denied bail at a hearing last week.

Umer Hyatt's attorney, Johnny Griffin, said that two imams -- Islamic religious leaders -- also arrested in connection with the case could help to clear his client's name. Mr. Griffin says that both the imams, who are being deported for overstaying their religious-worker visas, made potentially exculpatory statements about his client. In interviews shortly after his arrest in June, Adil Khan made statements "helpful" to his client, Mr. Griffin says, quoting a two-paragraph summary he said prosecutors provided him.

Khan -- and his son, who was arrested with him and faced similar immigration charges -- agreed to be deported July 15, and returned to Pakistan last month. The other imam, Shabbir Ahmed, is still in U.S. custody, although he also agreed to be deported. Mr. Griffin says he has been provided with a heavily redacted transcript of an interview in which Ahmed "makes statements that are clearly potentially exculpatory" of the Hyatts.

Mr. Griffin said the comments indicated that Ahmed "had no knowledge of my client's involvement in any jihad-type activities, and did not believe he would be involved in those activities."

The normal course of action in such a case, Mr. Griffin said, would be to file a sworn statement, called an affidavit, declaring that the person's testimony was essential for a fair trial. If the court accepted the affidavit, the individual could be detained as a material witness until the trial took place. But Mr. Griffin said that from a written transcript, especially one so heavily redacted, it was hard to determine the context of some of those comments.

Prosecutors agree that the men made potentially exculpatory statements during interviews, but say they have fulfilled their duty under the law by notifying Mr. Griffin. "We know very well what our discovery obligations under the law are," Assistant U.S. Attorney Larry Brown said, "and we have fulfilled them to a T." Prosecutors have "gone beyond our technical obligations," he said. "We've actually given him transcripts," Mr. Brown said, adding that in such cases, "the incentive for the government is to ensure that they are complying ... because it is the prosecution that will suffer if it turns out that there are any violations."
Posted by:Captain America

#5  Don't bet on a conviction yet. The SF Chronicle is setting up an entrapment defence.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-08-29 19:08  

#4  Hell yeah the FBI is deporting the imams that could clear the attorney's client. The FBI is well aware that in California the testimony of two muslim holy men is worth the more than the testimony of a dozen infidel. It's all right there in the Book of Sharia, didn't you know?
Posted by: Mark Z.   2005-08-29 13:27  

#3  How can anyone take the sworn statement of a Muslim as "true and correct" when their religion not only allows them to lie to "infidels", but requires it? It's time to realize that being a Muslim is incompatible with being an American citizen. They don't consider everyone "created equal", they don't accept equal treatment under the law, they don't accept the rights of others to worship as they choose, they don't accept responsibility for their behavior, and they don't believe they have to follow the laws of this nation if they don't conform to their particular brand of Islam.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-08-29 12:41  

#2  Don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out...
Posted by: mojo   2005-08-29 10:41  

#1  Well conselor, looks like your client's going to jail for awhile...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-08-29 09:35  

00:00