You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine
Take The Hint
2005-08-31
Amid the high emotion of Israel's evacuation from the Gaza Strip and four West Bank enclaves, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's acknowledgement of why the settlements were untenable has passed with little comment. "The changing reality in the country [...] required a change," Mr Sharon said in his televised speech last week.

"We cannot hold on to Gaza forever. More than a million Palestinians live there and double their number with each generation."

In other words, demography - not security - is driving the so-called disengagement plan.
This has long been the explanation of most analysts, but it is the first time it has been articulated so clearly by Mr Sharon. Israel's dilemma is, how can it be a Jewish state if there is a Palestinian Arab majority residing in territory under Israeli control?

The demographic struggle manifests itself in several ways, some of them constructed in steel and concrete - the "strengthening of settlements" and the West Bank barrier - but other manifestations are more subtle. Take, for example, Beit Safafa - a dilapidated Arab village long since engulfed by the southern expansion of Jerusalem - now surrounded on all sides by Jewish settlements and neighbourhoods. The village is famous for straddling the old post-1948 Green Line between Israel and Jordanian-controlled West Bank, with both halves coming under Israeli control after the 1967 war.

That means about half its residents have Israeli citizenship while the rest are West Bank Palestinians with Israeli-issued Jerusalem residency papers. In the past, the former have always felt superior to the latter - enjoying rights and privileges as "Israelis" that their "occupied" cousins lacked. "That is all changing," says one Israeli Arab resident. "Jews used to view us with respect, now they look at us the enemy, like people from the West Bank."

The speaker, and everyone else I met in Beit Safafa, spoke on condition of anonymity because they feared the consequences of getting on the wrong side of the Israeli authorities. Residents cite a litany of official government measures, as well as their daily interaction with Israeli Jews, that underline a clear message. "They are all saying the same thing: It's not your land; what are you doing here?" says one young man, a sound engineer...
The reality is straightforward, and the Jews have finally reached the unavoidable conclusion: Israel is for Jews and the secular, not for Moslems, or Christians or any other religion. If the Arabs wish to remain, they may continue doing so only if they renounce Islam, or if they convert to Judaism.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#3  Conversion of Arabs isn't impossible, just unlikely. Forced conversion won't happen.

As far as secularism goes, there is a mood that Israel could have a de jure split between the secular Jews and the Orthodox, reminiscent of the Israel-Judea split in the ancient world. But this is just talk, as even the Orthodox know that they could not sustain an economy left to their own devices. The secular Jews really run the place. The Orthodox make out by power brokering between the political left and the right and receive huge government subsidies.

But there is such tremendous factionalism among the Orthodox that it's not even funny. The Lubavitcher sect, one of the largest, doesn't even believe that Israel can exist until the Messiah shows up. The great majority plan to stay in the US until some Rebbe is declared, then mass-migrate to Israel to proclaim it Israel.

Other Orthodox sects exclude any other sect, and stay in ghettos in Israel. They throw rocks at any outsider who ventures in to their 'hood.

There are dozens of kashrut (kosher food) organizations in both the US and Israel, and many of the Orthodox will not eat non-naturally kosher food from other than their own organization.

These are not strengths. It also means that any temporary gains the Orthodox get from the secular will be eroded away over time. All told, an odd balance is maintained: the secular are envious of the piety of the Orthodox; the Orthodox are envious of the prosperity and freedom of the secular.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-08-31 20:42  

#2  Anonymoose,

You may also have an argument on the 'Jews and the secular' part. A lot of the haredi are against anything secular (e.g., bus service on the sabbath).
Posted by: mhw   2005-08-31 08:53  

#1  Hmmm,ya know moose I don't recall the Isralies ever asking or demanding anybody to convert to Judisam,now the Muslems,on the other hand,do make this demand.
Posted by: raptor   2005-08-31 08:46  

00:00