You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Brussels wants immigrants to swear allegiance to EU
2005-09-02
EFL: IMMIGRANTS to Britain will have to swear an oath of allegiance to EU laws and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, rather than the Queen, under a proposal announced by Brussels. The European Commission also announced measures to counter illegal immigration across Europe and others to promote integration of legal immigrants. Franco Frattini, the European Commissioner for justice and security, proposed an “oath of faithfulness” requiring all immigrants to the EU to swear allegiance to the union. He said: “One can get every immigrant to somehow declare they will respect national law, EU law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.”

The charter is seen by its supporters as representing the basic values of the EU. It goes considerably further than the old European Convention on Human Rights, offering, for example, the right to parental leave if you adopt a child, the right to continuous training, the right to social security benefits and the right to strike. It has no legal force because it was part of the European constitution, which was rejected by French and Dutch voters.

The Government recently started requiring immigrants to swear allegiance to the Queen and British democracy. Signor Frattini proposed a charter to which 90 per cent of France’s immigrants sign up as a model for the rest of Europe. “All those who enter Europe must respect European laws,” he said. “We can insist on respecting the basic values of Europe, and we can demand full respect for existing laws.” The rise of Islamic terrorism, and the growth of alienated ethnic communities, has persuaded many governments that more efforts must be made to promote integration of immigrants, including loyalty oaths.

The oath of allegiance to the EU — which could be in addition to or in place of the oath to the Queen — would be subject to negotiation, but the Government cannot veto it because it gave up its national veto on EU immigration law last year. Britain does have an opt-out, but it would have to reject the entire package of immigration measures.

A government spokesman said: “Questions of citizenship should be organised by member states nationally.” An EU diplomat said of the proposal: “It’s loony.”

Timothy Kirkhope, the leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament, and former immigration minister, said: “I am amazed. You can laugh, but it worryingly shows the views of people who should know better. I swore an oath of allegiance to the Queen. I am not going to take kindly to an Italian gentleman telling me to swear allegiance to unelected people, or to swear allegiance to something I don’t agree with — a unified European state.”
Mike Nattrass, deputy leader of the UK Independence Party, said: “An allegiance to something with no single culture, no agreed history, no common language and packed with fraud and corruption? The EU must be joking.”
Posted by:Steve

#9  Kool. More post-Christians pledging allegiance to muslim majority Brussels.
Posted by: ed   2005-09-02 23:36  

#8  Three Card Monty, Capitan America....
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-09-02 21:49  

#7  full monty
Posted by: Captain America   2005-09-02 17:45  

#6  The referendum had already failed, Aris. There was no point in continuation. The EU is increasingly looking like some sort of Monty Python skit.
Posted by: Darrell   2005-09-02 15:43  

#5  How's the toe Aris?
Posted by: Mona Gorilla   2005-09-02 15:36  

#4  back to guard duty, boy!
Posted by: Frank G   2005-09-02 14:34  

#3  I swore an oath of allegiance to the Queen. I am not going to take kindly to an Italian gentleman telling me to swear allegiance to unelected people.

LOL! He actually said those two sentences, the one after the other? And he probably didn't even mean them ironically at that.

As for the rest, if the Charter of Fundamental Rights alone (without the rest of the Constitution attached) was put to the vote, it would pass overwhelmingly, even in Britain. But ofcourse the elites (the British ones mainly) are never gonna let such a thing take place -- you saw how quick Blair was to cancel the referendum even for the (under the given circumstances) doomed-to-failure EU Constitution. After all he couldn't have the people of Britain becoming too attached to the idea of referendums deciding their relationship with Europe.

(And all the anti-EU people that used to complain about EU supposedly being a project of the political elites were actually *happy* about Blair just deciding to cancel the referendum and thus making sure it would remain such -- there's a second round of hypocrisy for you)
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2005-09-02 14:00  

#2  LOL!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-09-02 13:32  

#1  "I pledge allegiance to the EU, and its mighty state of hysteria. And to the republic of mass confusion, one bureaucracy, under Brussels, with high taxes and social welfare checks for all."
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-09-02 12:37  

00:00