You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
White House Wants Gitmo Appeal Rejected
2005-09-08
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to turn away a challenge to the military commissions the Bush administration created to put some detainees at Guantanamo Bay on trial for war crimes.

Lawyers for the terrorist named Salim Ahmed Hamdan are seeking Supreme Court review of an appeals court decision. In its brief to the Supreme Court, the Justice Department said the trial of Hamdan, a Yemeni who once was al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden's driver, should be allowed to proceed and said he will have ample opportunity later to raise any legal objections. Even if acquitted at trial, he will still be detained as an enemy combatant, the department said.

Hamdan's lawyers object to the possibility that classified documents will be introduced against him at trial and that he would not be given opportunity to spread the information around access to the information. It is entirely possible that no classified material would be presented by the prosecution, the government said in asking the Supreme Court not to hear Hamdan's case.

The Justice Department pointed out that the Pentagon relaxed the rules for tribunals a week ago, enabling classified information to be shared with defendants "to the extent consistent with national security, law enforcement interests and applicable law." The rewritten rule also bars the admission of classified information if it "would result in the denial of a full and fair trial." The rule changes also mean that the makeup of the tribunal hearing Hamdan's case is likely to change, overcoming another of Hamdan's objections, said the Justice Department.

Hamdan was not allowed to be present when his lawyers challenged the impartiality of the U.S. military officers sitting on the commission that was to hear Hamdan's case.

Under the new rules, the presiding officer is more like a judge in a court martial or civilian court and is required to rule on all questions of law; the other members of the commission will function more like a jury and are no longer permitted to participate in deciding most legal questions.

The shift in responsibilities is likely to result in replacing the other members of the commission. They were the ones challenged by Hamdan's lawyers, so the fact that Hamdan was not allowed to be present when their impartiality was called into question is no longer an issue, the department said.
Posted by:Steve White

00:00