You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN fails to agree to Security Council reforms
2005-09-11
UNITED NATIONS - It was meant to be the centerpiece of UN chief Kofi Annan’s ambitious plan to reform the world body on its 60th anniversary. Enlarging the powerful, 15-member Security Council was supposed to reflect the 21st century’s new balance of forces, enshrining the enhanced status of economic powerhouses Germany and Japan - the World War II losers - and the emerging power of India and Brazil.

But the plan, which was to have been endorsed by world leaders at their summit this week, has become a victim of the competing egos and interests of rival nations.
That's never happened before.
Its most promising version came in a draft introduced in the UN General Assembly in July by the so-called G4: Brazil, Germany, India and Japan. It called for boosting council membership to 25, with six new permanent non-veto-wielding seats - the G4 nations plus two from Africa - and four non-permanent seats.

The G4 draft was endorsed by nearly 40 nations, including Britain and France, but it also needed the backing of the 53-member African Union (AU) to secure the required two-third majority in the 191-member assembly. The G4, particularly Japan and Germany, mounted an aggressive drive to woo the Africans, who were pressing to correct what they see as a historical injustice that has left them as the only continent not represented on the Security Council.

But the Africans, led by Algeria and Egypt, pushed their own draft calling for two permanent Security Council seats for Africa - with the right to veto resolutions - as five non-permanent council seats, including two for Africa. That demand for veto power was generally viewed as unrealistic as the five current permanent members - Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States - were unwilling to share their veto right.
Might as well let them have it, it's not like anything important will get done in the UN ever again.
Yet as the United States and China signaled opposition to the G4 blueprint, the Africans decided at a summit in Addis Ababa last month to reject a compromise deal offered by the G4 and backed by Nigeria, the current AU chairman. Analysts said the AU stance stemmed in part from rivalry for Africa’s two council slots. Regional powerhouses Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa were seen as favorites, but Kenya, Angola, Libya and Senegal also made a claim.
I can see why Senegal would want a veto seat next to China and the U.S., they being so important to world peace and all ...
Early on, the United States warned it would reject any major expansion of the council, stating its preference for only two additional permanent seats, including one for Japan. China, which had previously backed council seats for Brazil, Germany and India, is against permanent status for regional rival Japan, due to its perceived refusal to face up to its wartime past.
Demonstrating that either the writer is clueless or doesn't want to write the obvious truth about the millenium-long competition between the two countries ...
To muddy the waters further, a group led by Canada, Pakistan and Italy pushed its own proposal to enlarge the council from 15 to 25 seats with 10 new non-permanent members elected for two-year terms, with the possibility of immediate re-election.

Each of the G4 aspirants had serious regional opposition: India from Pakistan, Brazil from Argentina and several Latin American countries, Japan from China and South Korea, and Germany from Italy, diplomats said. But in the end it was the opposition of the Washington and Beijing which sank the G4 bid, diplomats said.

“Don’t count us out yet,” Japan’s UN envoy Kenzo Oshima told AFP. Japanese diplomats, conceding that they had underestimated the depth of US and Chinese opposition, put on a brave face, saying they had succeeded in putting their country’s case on the world agenda. “We will continue to pursue Security Council reform this year and our dialogue with the African Union and other regions,” said Shinichi Iida, a Japanese UN delegate.

In an interview with French radio broadcast on Saturday, Annan conceded that a Security Council deal would not be agreed at the summit but expressed hope it could be sealed by the end of the year.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  Deck chair rearrangement on the Titanic. Of no matter in the large scheme of things. Nothing to see here, good people. Move along and get along with your lives. Each one of you alone will do something more significant than the UN. And you can take that to the bank, Jack.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-09-11 02:19  

#2  The deal has been done. China and the US made the deal. It's DOA. Pound dirt.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2005-09-11 01:55  

#1  The G-4 is someone's wet dream at this juncture. Ain't gonna happen. US and China oppose it, amongst others.

Moreover, the so-called Kofi "ambitious plan to reform the world body" is nothing more than attempt to inoculate himself from his Oil-for-Food scandal. Very transparent, even Clintonisc in approach.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-09-11 00:58  

00:00