Submit your comments on this article | ||
International-UN-NGOs | ||
Poor nations lose in watered-down UN document | ||
2005-09-14 | ||
Diplomats at the United Nations finally reached agreement last night on a watered-down document to reform the organisation and tackle poverty just hours before leaders arrived for the start of a world summit. This final draft, to be presented to the leaders for publication on Friday, fell far short of ambitious proposals for an overhaul of the UN which was set out earlier this year by Kofi Annan, the secretary general. Development campaigners expressed disappointment at the lack of progress on aid, debt and, particularly, trade. Ambassadors at the UN, who have been engaged in tortuous negotiations for weeks, made one final push yesterday to find consensus but soon abandoned the attempt. Instead, Jean Ping, Gabon's ambassador to the UN and president of the general assembly, unilaterally removed all the remaining points of contention, leaving in place a bland final draft. It is far removed from the original plan to reform the UN to meet the challenges of the 21st century. The general assembly voted in favour of the final draft, which is unlikely to be changed between now and Friday. About 149 leaders are scheduled to attend the summit, which would make it the biggest-ever world gathering. The general assembly will be addressed by George Bush this morning, and Tony Blair this evening. Campaigners and diplomats who favoured a bold approach put much of the blame for the failure on John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, who introduced hundreds of late changes to the original document.
Oxfam described the development section of the final draft as a "recycling of old pledges". Save the Children said the chance of a historic breakthrough on poverty "had all but slipped through the fingers of world leaders". The final draft document shows progress has been made during negotiations on intervention to prevent genocide, but limited progress on the creation of two UN bodies, a human rights council and a peace-building commission. There is no new money for aid or debt relief, and the language on fair trade has been weakened. Nor has there been movement on climate change, arms proliferation or expansion of the security council. The negotiations have been caught in a squeeze between Mr Bolton, and a group of countries that one diplomat referred to as "the awkward squad Mr Blair, who will meet Mr Bush this morning, is worried that progress made at the G8 meeting at Gleneagles in July on aid and debt may end up being reversed. The prime minister believes elections in Germany and Japan, together with the impact of Hurricane Katrina in the US, may make it more difficult to persuade G8 members to make good on their promises and to widen the Gleneagles agreement to other rich countries.
| ||
Posted by:Steve White |
#11 "recycling of old pledges" Oh well, how about honoring those first? They just wanted some shiny new pledges that they of course weren't to honor anyway, just like the old ones. |
Posted by: True German Ally 2005-09-14 16:59 |
#10 mite as well brake it eezy to em |
Posted by: muck4doo 2005-09-14 14:13 |
#9 Oxfam described the development section of the final draft as a "recycling of old pledges". Save the Children said the chance of a historic breakthrough on poverty "had all but slipped through the fingers of world leaders". My wallet thanks you, John Bolton... |
Posted by: tu3031 2005-09-14 12:06 |
#8 Boo-fucken'-hoo. |
Posted by: mmurray821 2005-09-14 12:00 |
#7 Everyone raise their hand who thinks the founders of the United Nations really intended for the UN bureaucrats to have their hands on our wallets? |
Posted by: Darrell 2005-09-14 11:57 |
#6 Everyone raise their hand who thinks the founders of the United Nations really intended "tackling poverty" as a primary mandate of the UN? |
Posted by: DO 2005-09-14 11:32 |
#5 A perfect example of why the GA is a ball-less gas factory, by design. |
Posted by: mojo 2005-09-14 10:25 |
#4 Too baaaaad. |
Posted by: gromgoru 2005-09-14 06:26 |
#3 Typical Guardian spin. Bolton wanted a bunch of stuff taken out. A bunch of stuff was taken out. Look to me like he won. |
Posted by: phil_b 2005-09-14 02:11 |
#2 "Poor nations lose in watered-down UN document" What did they lose? Jaques and Kofi's attempt to put the UN;s hand in my wallet? Oxfam? Save the Children? Are they here in my town saving children? Those recycling old pledges would be the EU of course. Stick a fork in this waste of space and time called the UN, it's done. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2005-09-14 01:05 |
#1 "Campaigners and diplomats who favoured a bold approach..." They misspelled "old". Throwing money, other people's money, is always their "answer". The UN is the most concentrated nest of con artists, kleptocrats, crooks, scammers, and schemers ever assembled. Thanks, John. You're just what this bunch needs. |
Posted by: .com 2005-09-14 00:37 |