You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
NKors demand a pony nuke reactor from U.S.
2005-09-20
North Korea said Tuesday it would not dismantle its nuclear weapons program until the United States first provides a Shetland pony an atomic energy reactor, casting doubt on its commitment to a breakthrough agreement reached at international arms talks.
There was plenty of doubt even before this demand.
The North insisted during arms talks that began last week in Beijing that it be given a light-water reactor, a type less easily diverted for weapons use, in exchange for abandoning nuclear weapons. The agreement reached at the talks' end Monday — the first since the negotiations began in August 2003 — says the six countries in the negotiations will discuss the reactor issue "at an appropriate time." Both the United States and Japan, members of the six-nation disarmament talks, rejected the North's latest demand. "This is not the agreement that they signed and we'll give them some time to reflect," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.
"Hokay. We thought about it. Give us our pony!"
But the North's statement Tuesday indicated it was again raising the reactor demand as a prerequisite for disarming. "We will return to the NPT and sign the safeguards agreement with the IAEA and comply with it immediately upon the U.S. provision of LWRs, a basis of confidence-building to us," the North's Foreign Ministry said in the statement, carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency. "The U.S. should not even dream of the issue of (North Korea's) dismantlement of its nuclear deterrent before providing LWRs," the North said.
"Don't bother with even building that barn door. We wanna ride our pony NOW!!!!"
Posted by:Seafarious

#5  Why don't we box up Three Mile Island and ship it to them?
Posted by: Capsu78   2005-09-20 12:09  

#4  I'm all for giving Japan nukes and providing anti-missile (both regular and ballistic) tech to Tiawan. That would make China jump up and down like an organ grider's monkey.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-09-20 11:34  

#3  Why would we "negotiate" on this subject when North Korea has already demonstrated a complete lack of fidelity to the 1994 agreement? North Korea needs to either verifiably comply first on any new deal or have us promote nukes for Japan and Taiwan. That will get China's attention.
Posted by: Darrell   2005-09-20 09:37  

#2  I knew that any agreement with the Norks was DOA. Anyone hear Ted Turners' comments about his visit to Nork? He saw a paradise where workers commute by foot and bicycle. He also mentioned that they "looked thin." Ted has not only drunk the Socialists Kool Aid he is brewing his own now.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-09-20 07:14  

#1  Read, the USA has to go on pretending that NK has no nukes, and pretend that China doesn't controll 'em as it does other vital imports to NK from across the border, besides of course PC ping-ponging with IRAN ags America. In a way, China is as much responsible as the NKCP for NK's famines and econ struggles.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-09-20 04:07  

00:00