You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S. Hails IAEA Decision on Iran Referral
2005-09-25
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - The U.N. atomic watchdog agency Saturday put Iran just one step away from referral to the Security Council unless Tehran eases suspicions about its nuclear activities in coming months - a move the United States has been pushing for years. The chief U.S. delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency hailed the decision, describing it as a wake-up call for Tehran ``to come clean'' or face the consequences.

But his Iranian counterpart blasted the approval of the resolution and warned of retaliation. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is for generating electricity.
Well then, a thorough inspection regimen shouldn't be a problem.
The decision by the 35-nation board represented a victory for Washington, which asserts Iran has nuclear weapons ambitions. For more than two years, it has failed to enlist board support to haul Iran before the council for allegedly violating commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. ``The international community is ... not satisfied with the level of confidence-building measures Iran has so far taken,'' IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said.
He's just got to be taking the gas pipe on this one.
Saturday's decision was far from unanimous, though. Only 22 of the 35 board nations voted for the U.S.-backed European Union motion. Twelve nations abstained, including Russia and China, which are veto-wielding members of the Security Council, diplomats said. The others were developing nations. Those supporting the resolution included the United States, European countries, Canada, Australia and Japan. They were joined by India, Peru, Singapore and Ecuador, reflecting some support in the developing nations' camp.
Notice how India voted.
Venezuela cast the only vote against.

The resolution called on the board to consider reporting Iran at a future meeting. As grounds, it mentioned noncompliance with the nuclear arms control treaty and suspicions that Iran's nuclear activities could threaten international peace and security. Diplomats from countries backing the resolution said it set Iran up for referral as early as November, when the board next meets in regular session, unless it dispels international concerns.

Outlining what Iran must do to avoid such action, the draft called on it to give IAEA experts access to nuclear-related documents and sites, suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ratify an inspection agreement with the IAEA. In opting for referral, the board is ``concerned that Iran's activities pose an increasing threat to international peace and security,'' Schulte said. ``The IAEA has called on Iran to ... come clean.''

But Iran's delegation head, Javad Vaeidi, said the vote was evidence ``there is no consensus on the way forward.'' He also warned, ``Threat invokes threat.'' Tehran already warned Friday that if the resolution was approved, it could respond by starting uranium enrichment - a possible path to nuclear arms - and by reducing IAEA powers to inspect its activities under the additional agreement it signed but had not yet ratified.

Both threats were contained in unsigned letters and shown by a member of the Iranian delegation to ElBaradei, diplomats accredited to the agency said on condition of anonymity because their information was confidential.
Typical MSM reporting.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Hey, JerseyMike, this IAEA-UNSC thing is a source of innocent merriment and mirth. They take themselves soooooooooooo seriously that it is hard to keep a straight face. But then, you open your wallet, moths fly out, and you say, "WTF? These guys are scam artists and thieves!"
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-09-25 14:29  

#3  After scandal, corruption, and thievery on a scale that makes Enron and Worldcom look like the work of amatuers, and at least a decade and a half of blatant anti-US behavior its disturbing that anyone with a brain in their head in the US would give a rats ass what the UN or the IAEA has to say about anything.
Why in the world being threatened with referal to the security council is hailed as a positive step toward anything is completely beyond me.
On the other hand - looking down the barrel of a couple of carrier groups is something that is much more persuasive.

Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-09-25 03:31  

#2  That was supposed to be a joke but I'm an idiot. Same continent anyway...
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-09-25 02:32  

#1  Doesn't Ecuador get two votes now?
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-09-25 02:13  

00:00