You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Bolton: UN can be fixed
2005-09-29
John Bolton made clear Wednesday that he believes the United Nations has systematic management problems, but the new U.S. ambassador to the world body said he held out hope that those problems could be fixed. If they are, Bolton said, the United Nations should be allowed in the future to run operations like the much-criticized Oil-for-Food program. "There may be an occasion that we want the U.N. to properly run a program like this," Bolton told the House International Relations Committee in his first extensive public comments about the United Nations since his recess appointment early last month.

The Oil-for-Food program, which allowed Iraq to trade fuel for food and medical supplies, was alleged to have spent millions in paying off middlemen along the supply chain. Iraq also spent money earned by the oil sales to try to convince some members of the U.N. Security Council to lift sanctions on the Mideast nation.

Also appearing before the committee was Mark Malloch Brown, Secretary-General Kofi Annan's chief of staff, who stepped into what some at the United Nations consider the lion's den. He escaped without a mauling, instead being treated respectfully by committee members who appear to have made the calculation that he is a genuine reformer who has Annan's ear. Brown told FOX News in an exclusive interview that the recent U.N. summit was a major step forward on the road to reform in that it gave top officials an endorsement to press ahead with sweeping management changes that might prevent another Oil-for-Food type scandal in the future.
Posted by:Blitzen

#8  mark e. - hear, hear! :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-09-29 18:34  

#7  Although politics might also knock the US out of voting in such a system I think it would be great to see the Muslim world justify wife beating, slavery, and their anti-religious stance despite these bing things specifically banned by the UN Declaration of Human rights.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-09-29 14:54  

#6  You wanna fix the UN, every nation that does not follow the UN Declaration on Human Rights doesn't get a vote in the General Assembly or Security Council.

That would knock out 90% of the UN right there and do it according to the UN's stated principles.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-09-29 14:53  

#5  "UN can be fixed." [bu-dum-tssshhh]
Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.

- John Bolton at the The Improv
Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-09-29 12:42  

#4  Im with bman Its time to start a capitalist, democratic alliance. (I think the capitalist must be in thier I really fear that we are slowly being moved to a world socialist democratic gov hell even the repub's have already forgotten the contract with america and newt who got them back into power and are doing the old Big Gov Pork Lard crap they used to do, moral values are important but Big Gov slashing is number 1 the gov should sub out all work from the girl at the courthouse to the gov inspectors to everything schools should be vouchers were the good schools would thrive the bad ones disapear, and the military thats it)To join the alliance you would have to meet certian requirments of economic freedom, democratic standards, and human rights. The alliance would be a military alliance assuring war with one is war with all and that all would work together to promote democracy capitalims all around the world. The benefits for joining the alliance would be free trade of course, some shared technology, and the respect of being the true Super Super Power this alliance would be as soon as it was formed.

The UN could be kept and the alliance would just have a massive block vote in the UN, breaking up the UN and forming a new alliance may cuase the outcast to form a competing alliance with maybe china or russia in the lead for fear of survival. Keeping the UN would ensure the norm to some point while at the same time allowing the new alliance the ability to grow and overtake the old from within while not freekin the whole world out to much. NATO would be a good start but we would have to get rid of the veto powers and rewrite the docs a bit to be more than just a military defensive alliance more into economic and democratic alliance.

Just imagine the US most of Europe together through the idea of threating to shut off the new found economic success of China in return of just some real democratic concesions from China. The Chineese gov would have to work with us their people who have now seen and felt the good life would freek if it all went away because their leaders wouldnt give them more freedom something they want anyway.
Posted by: C-Low   2005-09-29 10:56  

#3  Use the U.N. dues to pay for the hurricane disaster.
Posted by: bman   2005-09-29 10:03  

#2  "Bolton: UN can be fixed"

Yes... in the same way that my cat was fixed. So...line up, guys....
Posted by: Mark E.   2005-09-29 09:45  

#1  Sorry John. It needs to be put down. Howard, Blair, Bush, Koizumi, Rasmussen, et. al. need to start talking about a new confederation of free countries to replace this League of Nations II. The authoritarian, totalitarian governments need not apply. The corrupt need not apply.

Now at least, we can drive one big hunking stake through the heart of the lie that the US contributed to WWII by not joining the League of Nations.
Posted by: Spirong Phavinter9038   2005-09-29 09:38  

00:00