| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| House: Major Re-Write of Endangered Species Act |
| 2005-09-30 |
| The House on Thursday passed legislation that could greatly expand private property rights under the environmental law that is credited with helping keep the bald eagle from extinction but also has provoked bitter fighting. By a vote of 229-193, lawmakers approved a top-to-bottom overhaul of the 1973 Endangered Species Act, perhaps the nation’s most powerful environmental law... The rewrite faces an uncertain future in the Senate, where Republican Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, head of the panel that oversees the law, has expressed concerns about the House bill... The bill would require the government to compensate property owners if steps to protect species thwarted development plans. It also would make political appointees responsible for some scientific determinations and would stop the government from designating "critical habitat," which limits development. This bill wins hearts and minds througout the western US, where the ESA has been used in insane ways to steal land, drive people out of their homes, confiscate water rights, and any number of other authoritarian offenses. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #2 No. Actually the ESA should be declared an unconstitutional abridgement of the separation of church and state. If the Boy Scouts are a religious organization, then the ESA is a government establishment of the oldest religions known to man, the worship of nature. Still in effect in many primitive [as well as university] cultures. |
| Posted by: Clolung Whinter4771 2005-09-30 21:22 |
| #1 This is long overdue. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2005-09-30 20:41 |