You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Al Qaeda not an organisation but an ideology
2005-10-01
Al Qaeda was characterised at a congressional hearing on Thursday as a movement or an ideology rather than an organisation.
Let us pause in the important business of killing the bastards to quibble over words...
This was stated by Congressman Ed Royce, chairman of the house sub-committee on international terrorism and non-proliferation, in his introductory remarks at a hearing of his subcommittee. Among those who testified was Arnaud de Borchgrave, who in the past has claimed that Osama Bin Laden is living in Peshawar. A follow-up hearing will take place later this year. Royce said, “The trans-national terrorist threat facing the US is rapidly evolving. Since 9/11, as a result of unrelenting US military pressure, Al Qaeda has had to drastically reconfigure. Many now characterise Al Qaeda as a ‘movement’ or ‘ideology’, rather than a formal organisation. Some have even described the loose alliance of extremist networks targeting us as a ‘globalised insurgency’. Some have suggested that US counter-terrorism strategy does not match this evolving threat.”
U.S. counter-terrorism strategy has been evolving. I'll admit that it seems to have lost its focus at times.
The Republican from California said that while the US has had success in dismantling the formal Al Qaeda network, not enough attention has been paid to countering the ideology fuelling this ‘movement’. He feared that radicalism is spreading throughout Africa and Central Asia. Then there are those who point at the lack of a sharp strategy along the lines of the ‘containment’ doctrine that guided the US during the Cold War. The administration, he noted, has begun a comprehensive review of its counter-terrorism strategy with the intention of updating its National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, released in 2003.
I'd suggest killing them in droves, myself, without mercy and without quarter. Instead, we've been agonizing over the accomodations at Guantanamo...
Posted by:Fred

#4  1) Communism was (is) an ideology with various communist parties as organizations. Al-Qaeda may very well be an ideology, but there are various organized groups that share that ideology.

Ultimately, it is the actions of the adherents that are important.

2) Mr. Royce should wake up and realize that radicalism has been spreading throughout the middle east, Africa and muslim Asia for over 40 years. We have only been actively opposing it for 4.

3) I propose that we run a test. The U.S. will actively oppose Al-Queda and seek to destroy it everywhere. Europe can seek dialogue and appeasement. We'll see what works.
Posted by: DoDo   2005-10-01 15:04  

#3  This statement is a day late and about a billion dollars short. AQ is a network of networks, for the love of pete. That's why we seem to always be areesting the #2 AQ guy...we arrest one, and poof, there is another waiting in the wings...
Posted by: beagletwo   2005-10-01 10:35  

#2  KKK not an organisation but an ideology.

Does it work Mr. Royce? Think you can sell that to the Democrat Black Caucus?
Posted by: Whetch Fligum1833   2005-10-01 09:02  

#1  *snicker*
We've wiped out the organization and now they console themselves with the fact that many share their hateful ideology. It's like saying that the KKK is an ideology, not an organization. Yeah, ok. There are lots of bigots, but it's nice that the KKK organization has been effectively wiped out.
Posted by: 2b   2005-10-01 01:57  

00:00