| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Zarqawi's Losing Strategy |
| 2005-10-13 |
| Perhaps senior Bush administration officials thought establishing a democratic Iraq would be quick work. In an essay I wrote for the Dec. 9, 2002, issue of The Weekly Standard, I described what I thought a very difficult path to peace: "Pity Gen. Tommy Franks or, for that matter, any American military commander tasked with overseeing a post-Saddam Baghdad. For in that amorphous, dicey phase the Pentagon calls 'war termination' ... U.S. and allied forces liberating Iraq will attempt -- more or less simultaneously -- to end combat operations, cork public passions, disarm Iraqi battalions, bury the dead, generate electricity, pump potable water, bring law out of embittering lawlessness, empty jails of political prisoners, pack jails with criminals, turn armed partisans into peaceful citizens, re-arm local cops who were once enemy infantry, shoot terrorists, thwart chiselers, carpetbaggers and black-marketeers, fix sewers, feed refugees, patch potholes and get trash trucks rolling, and accomplish all this under the lidless gaze of Peter Jennings and Al Jazeera." Crammed with the nitty-gritty of governance and economics, the sentence ends with a caustic reminder of the importance of media interpretation. October 2005: Peter Jennings has passed away, Al Jazeera is still with us -- though arguably less antagonistic since the Iraqi presidential election of January 2005. The terror war within Iraq continues to pit terrorist hell against democratic hope. A multitude of economic and governmental challenges linger. But current combat in Iraq is not simply the result of slapdash postwar planning. The United States has two strategic goals that have taken years to mesh in terms of political, economic and military operations. Goal One: engage Al-Qaida on military and political battlefields in order to destroy its claim to "divine sanction" and to "speak on behalf of Islam." Goal Two: seed development of modern, democratic states in the politically dysfunctional Arab Muslim Middle East. Achieving both goals defeats Al-Qaida. Goal Two is a multi-decade project. Reaching it requires sustained, courageous effort, but Iraq's January election and its constitutional process are signs of progress. Sensational carnage and "expert pessimism" dominated the international media's January election coverage. Despite the dour predictions, Iraqi voters responded, waving ink-stained fingers -- a terror-defying demonstration of political change. Al Jazeera didn't miss it. Military defeat in Afghanistan dealt Al-Qaida's claim of "divine sanction" a hard blow. However, smashing Al-Qaida's claim to act on behalf of "all Muslims" is far more complicated than killing or arresting terrorists. Undermining its megalomaniacal appeal meant exposing it as the inhuman, ungodly Mass Murder Inc. it is. The optimal outcome would be to expose Al-Qaida as a threat to Muslims and detrimental to the best ideals of Islam. When Al-Qaida's zealots blow up trains in Spain or subways in London, those are attacks of their choosing conducted on "infidel terrain." The genius of the war in Iraq is a brutal but necessary form of strategic judo: It brought the War on Terror into the heart of the Middle East and onto Arab Muslim turf. In Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's theo-fascists have been spilling Arab blood, and Al Jazeera has noticed that, too. Arabs have also seen the Iraqi people's struggle and their emerging political alternative to despotism and feudal autocracy. Zarqawi's murder spree has revealed fissures among Al-Qaida fanatics. Last week, the United States released a letter coalition intelligence believes Al-Qaida's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, sent to Zarqawi. Zawahiri describes Iraq as "the greatest battle for Islam in our era." But Iraq has become a political and information battle that Zawahiri realizes Al-Qaida may be losing. According to The New York Times, Zawahiri told Zarqawi to attack Americans rather than Iraqi civilians and to "refrain from the kind of gruesome beheadings and other executions that have been posted on Al-Qaida websites. Those executions have been condemned in parts of the Muslim world as violating tenets of the faith." In February 2004, Zarqawi acknowledged a democratic Iraqi state would mean defeat for Al-Qaida in Iraq. To defeat democracy, he has pursued a strategy of relentless, nihilistic bloodbath. It's a brutal irony of war: In doing so, he is losing the war for the hearts and minds. |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #2 Add to the list of amazing things the Americans did all at once, those done under the amazing J. Paul Bremer. As MacArthur did to Japan, Bremer did to Iraq, but one better. Mac set up Japan to become an economic powerhouse by adding sections to their constitution that would eventually result in success. It still took many years of hard work. Bremer, however, designed their entire economy from pieces of the best economic systems in the world. It is an almost textbook example of the best of everything in economics. On top of that, being pristine, without the political baggage that those systems evolved in developing those systems from scratch, these subsystems will run at peak efficiency. This being said, I project a time perhaps twenty years in the future, when Iraq will become one of the top ten economies in the world. If you think about it, what is happening in Iraq right now, the "insurgency", is nothing. It is a violent sideshow to the big picture, a petty distraction compared to the immensity of what Iraq is being and becoming. It is a nation nearing 30 Million people. A few thousand violent criminals against 200,000 police and soldiers. A death cult whose days are numbered. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-10-13 13:58 |
| #1 http://www.dni.gov/letter_in_english.pdf This is the letter,long but good read. Still, ZARQ needs to be wacked!! |
| Posted by: ARMYGUY 2005-10-13 11:24 |