You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Judge rules on Guantanamo strike
2005-10-27
Lawyers for scores of terror suspects on hunger strike at the Guantanamo Bay jail must be told before detainees are force-fed, says a US federal judge. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler also ordered the US government to give medical records going back a week before such feedings take place. She said the US "can hardly be proud" of its conduct if it was true that the jail had been using brutal methods.
The US denies using inhuman treatment of foreign suspects in its Cuba prison.

The Pentagon says 26 out of some 500 prisoners are on hunger strike that started in August, but one human rights group puts the figure at more than 200. Most of prisoners at the US naval base in southern Cuba have been held for more than three years without being charged.

Judge Kessler said the US must notify the lawyers at least 24 hours before force feedings begin and also provide information at least weekly until suspects are no longer being fed by force. She acted after the lawyers representing about a dozen of Guantanamo detainees made an emergency petition, expressing concerns over the health of their clients. The judge spoke of "deeply troubling" allegations of forced feedings in which US jail personnel were accused of inserting thick tubes through the detainees' noses and into their stomachs without anaesthesia or sedatives. "If the allegations are true - and they are all explicitly, specifically and vigorously denied by the government - they describe the conduct of which the United States can hardly be proud," the judge wrote. However, she denied the lawyers' request for immediate telephone access to their clients.

The ruling affected a group of detainees from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Afghanistan.
Just pull the tubes and let them starve to death
Posted by:Steve

#6  ahhhh yessss Useful tool: Judge Gladys Kessler
**AFL-CIO/DNC Election Scandal**
Judge Helps AFL-CIO/DNC Suppress Public Documents
U.S. Dist. Judge Gladys Kessler (D.D.C., Clinton) blocked the Fed. Election Comm'n July 16 from re-releasing public documents from FEC's probe of 1996 campaign efforts of AFL-CIO, the Democratic Nat'l Committee, and other liberal entities. Kessler's preliminary injunction, sought by AFL-CIO/DNC, came a day before FEC planned to re-release the documents, which may contain evidence of union embezzlement crimes whose statutes of limitations are due to run this Fall. Despite this, Kessler's order will remain in effect until at least Oct.; she claims no one will suffer a great injury from the delay. AFL-CIO/DNC claim the documents contain "proprietary information," including campaign strategies and employees' names.
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-27 17:37  

#5  Just appeal on both sides, maximize the friction. Tube in - tube out, tube in - tube out.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-10-27 16:39  

#4  Well, if I were the gov't lawyer, I'd move for Rule Number Whatever sanctions and costs of proof for the unfounded allegations. Prolly loose, but i'd try.
Posted by: Mark E.   2005-10-27 12:12  

#3  wasn't Gladyd overturned previously on some Gitmo rulings?
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-27 10:12  

#2  "If the allegations are true - and they are all explicitly, specifically and vigorously denied by the government - they describe the conduct of which the United States can hardly be proud," the judge wrote.

And if they aren't true, are you gonna come down on the scumbag lawyers that made them up? Or has Gladys already made up her mind on what she thinks the truth is?
Posted by: tu3031   2005-10-27 10:03  

#1  Apparently, the lawyers mentuioned no longer represent the wishes of their clients, therefore, they should be replaced by lawyers who do.
Posted by: wxjames   2005-10-27 09:50  

00:00