You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Miers Withdraws Supreme Court Nomination
2005-10-27
Harriet Miers withdrew her nomination to be a Supreme Court justice Thursday in the face of stiff opposition and mounting criticism about her qualifications. President Bush said he reluctantly accepted her decision to withdraw, after weeks of insisting that he did not want her to step down. He blamed her withdrawal on calls in the Senate for the release of internal White House documents that the administration has insisted were protected by executive privilege.

"It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House _ disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel," Bush said. "Harriet Miers' decision demonstrates her deep respect for this essential aspect of the constitutional separation of powers _ and confirms my deep respect and admiration for her."

Miers' surprise withdrawal stunned Washington on a day when the capital was awaiting news on another front _ the possible indictment of senior White House aides in the CIA leak case. Fox reporting prosecutor sez no announcement today
Miers told the president she was withdrawing at 8:30 p.m. Wednesday. In her letter dated Thursday, Miers said she was concerned that the confirmation process "would create a burden for the White House and our staff that is not in the best interest of the country." She noted that members of the Senate had indicated their intention to seek documents about her service in the White House in order to judge whether to support her nomination to the Supreme Court. "I have been informed repeatedly that in lieu of records, I would be expected to testify about my service in the White House to demonstrate my experience and judicial philosophy," she wrote.

"While I believe that my lengthy career provides sufficient evidence for consideration of my nomination, I am convinced the efforts to obtain Executive Branch materials and information will continue."
Posted by:Steve

#24  Frank, if the conservatives are unwilling to fall on their sword for their president why the hell should a RINO fall on his for one of the named lawyers or judges they want?

Conservatives have fallen on their sword a number of times (The President's failure to veto spending bills, support of RINOs like Specter, etc.). Guess the Supreme court pick is the line in the sand.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-10-27 21:15  

#23  What I care about in this is the ability of presidents to fight terrorism and all of the related hostilities that will be coming down the pike for the next decade+.

Yes, SCOTUS matters a lot. Kelo was a disaster as are other recent rulings - not to mention the invocation of international law.

But be very careful how you fight this battle you all want to fight. Bush has been playing along with the RINOs because he has been getting, by and large, what he has asked for on the WOT.
Posted by: anon   2005-10-27 20:31  

#22  I'll miss seeing her eye make-up, that thick black line of eye liner really made her a sight to see. Ma-scary-ia
Posted by: Captain America   2005-10-27 19:03  

#21  The problem with the poker analysis if conservatives had to have antied up. Some did, and lost. Those that didn't want what they want but, they refused, and rightfully so, to go along with the game.

Now, Bush hopefully realizes when conservatvies mean conservatvies for the bench, they are serious.

This is more of a signal that conservative support is dependant on Bush respecting conservatives and their agenda. Playing to the left won't get your man ( or woman ) confirmed.
Posted by: badanov   2005-10-27 18:02  

#20  Close. When the senate votes down the next candidate and the nuclear option fails, Bush will be able to tell the conservatives to STFU when hes sends up daughter of Harriet.
Posted by: Elmemble Shomotch9889   2005-10-27 17:37  

#19  I think all of you are wrong. I believe Harriet Miers was a stalking horse, used by Bush to discover who his friends and enemies were. The chattering of all classes has proven beyond a doubt that there are many "conservative" members of both parties that wear the mantle, but don't walk the walk. I'm sure Rove has been busy digging dirt on all the whiners and complainers. When Bush nominates someone like Luttig or Batchelder (the choice of the folks at the Ashbrook Institute), the president will have all the ammunition he needs to see he gets his choice. Bush is a poker player, and is supposedly deadly at Texas Hold-em. I think he just bluffed, and won.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-10-27 17:24  

#18  Frank, if the conservatives are unwilling to fall on their sword for their president why the hell should a RINO fall on his for one of the named lawyers or judges they want? A RINO looking after his own seat and power isn't going to worry about the power of the president now that his own faction has wounded that same man. Any threats to their position in the Senate would only give the RINOs more negotiating power with the Dems. And its all about power. The Republican cattle prod is out of juice.
Posted by: Whomolet Glomoque9258   2005-10-27 16:49  

#17  I would love to see it, Frank. And I mean love it. The Senate Pubs are the worst handled bunch of prima donnas I've ever seen. There are some great ones, but there sure is a sizable contingent of gutless turds, too. Frist is totally ineffective.

At this point, I guess they having nothing to lose. If they don't, the next three yrs will be wasted.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-27 16:23  

#16  disgree politely. Rogers-Brown or Luttig or several others could and would pass the test, albeit a nasty one. The Dems have guaranteed that anyone right of Bader Ginsburg is unacceptable, sobeit. Time to take the fighton and quit pussyfooting. Nominate a great justice and take a cattle prod to the RINOs
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-27 16:15  

#15  WG summed it up in #8. A classic pyrrhic victory.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-27 15:30  

#14  MSM bias alert - this is an odd headline to run when the candidate withdraws her name:

AP - Bush Abandons Push for Miers Nomination
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-10-27 15:14  

#13  Coulter nomination => Hillary as Pres. At least Hillary is disiciplined about how/when she runs her mouth.
Posted by: seer   2005-10-27 13:45  

#12  I wonder if Coulter would be the first Justice to pose in their annual picture wearing a mini-robe.
Posted by: Elminemble Whuse3187   2005-10-27 13:40  

#11  I'm sure she'll piss off half the Republicans as well, and each half of the Republican party that helped kill the Miers nomination thinks they're solely responsible.

(Many of the arguments pitted against Miers count just as much against Coulter... she hasn't been a judge or a professor, for instance... and has much less of a record as far as actually practicing LAW instead of being a run-your-mouth-off on TV-news pundit. Bah, humbug.)
Posted by: Phil   2005-10-27 12:54  

#10  Two words - "Justice Coulter". (J.D. Univ. Mich., editor "The Michigan Law Review", corp. lawyer, founder local chapter Federalist Society, track record as a rock solid conservative, and capable of making Senate Dems cry like babies at her nomination hearings).
Posted by: DMFD   2005-10-27 11:57  

#9  Yup - that's my take on it too.

And the pity is that the whole point of Miers was her exposure to the challenges of fighting the war on terror. Shortsighted to have killed the possibility of that on the court, folks. See today's note about Padilla etc.
Posted by: anon   2005-10-27 11:29  

#8  So, who are you going to get. The Senate Republicans which are dependent upon RINOs have shown no stomach for a fight, so I can't see any of the much promoted names getting a floor vote, now that the 'base' has wounded their president. The RINOs aren't going to risk their seats for the man. As you sow, so shall ye reap. Better stealth than none at all. Now you'll get none.
Posted by: Whomolet Glomoque9258   2005-10-27 11:25  

#7  I knew she was dead when the Powerline guys, who made it clear that they would be happy should she withdraw, started defending her against unfair accusations. It's always bad news when the people who don't like you feel it necessary to jump to your defense.
Posted by: 2b   2005-10-27 10:58  

#6  Good. The lack of any record made me nervous.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-10-27 10:30  

#5  What makes you think any of them would want to be nominated, after watching Roberts get his adoption records looked at by the Press and Miers get attacked by her own side?
Posted by: Phil   2005-10-27 10:15  

#4  Krauthammer laid this path out - wiser minds took it. Good. Now nominate Rogers Brown or Luttig
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-27 10:01  

#3  "Deeply laid Rovian plots?"

Wheels within wheels! This has to be all part of the "PLAN"!

/JoeMendiola
Posted by: Beanie   2005-10-27 09:27  

#2  I found the Miers nomination rather curious. She did not really seem like a viable candidate from many perspectives. Makes me wonder if there was something else behind it. A compliment to a faithful friend? A smokescreen for another nominee? Deeply laid Rovian plots?
Posted by: SteveS   2005-10-27 09:23  

#1  Props to Miers for doing the right thing.
Posted by: DMFD   2005-10-27 09:10  

00:00