You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Kofi v. Bolton: Clash Over Syria
2005-11-09
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and U.S. Ambassador John Bolton clashed with one another on Tuesday over whether Syria was cooperating with the U.N. Security Council in implementing recent resolutions. The question is key as the council a little over a week ago unanimously approved a new resolution ordering Syria to cooperate fully with a U.N. investigation into the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri or face possible unspecified "further action." Following that October 31 vote, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the measure "made it clear that failure to comply with these demands will lead to serious consequences from the international community."

Tuesday's verbal clash began when Annan, in Cairo for a meeting with Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, told reporters Damascus "has had a good record" in implementing Security Council resolutions. Bolton, asked in New York about Annan's statement, said Syria's performance in carrying out council resolutions had ranged from "very lacking" to "substantially lacking."
Look for more tears shed by Senator George Voinovich on the Senate floor.
Asked whether Annan's words were helpful to the council, Bolton responded: "I think I will not comment on his comment."

The 15-nation council has passed a number of resolutions in the past 14 months dealing with Syria's domination of neighboring Lebanon and with Hariri's February 14 assassination. A resolution adopted September 2, 2004, demanded the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon, a disbanding of all militias in Lebanon and an end to Syrian meddling in Lebanon. A second, approved April 7, 2005, authorized an international investigation into Hariri's murder.

Following the September 2004 resolution, Syria withdrew its forces from Lebanese soil and Lebanon held parliamentary elections free of Syrian interference. Acting on the April 2005 text, Detlev Mehlis, who heads the U.N. inquiry into Hariri's death, accused the Syrian authorities last month of obstructing his work and said the killing could not have been plotted without the knowledge of Syrian security officials and their Lebanese allies. Annan, in Cairo, said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had assured him of Syria's intention to cooperate with Mehlis and praised Syrian implementation of the September 2004 measure.
Posted by:Captain America

#7  After Harare or Kinshasa, the UN could continue its "Out of the Frying Pan & Into the Fire" tour by moving on to Pyongyang. Perhaps Kimmy could snatch the crown out of Kofi's hands at his King of the World coronation ceremony.
Posted by: ryuge   2005-11-09 18:08  

#6  Couldn't agree more Beo. Perhaps if Harare isn't up to the task then maybe Kinshasa. There the rest of the UN wonks could participate in some gang rapes along with the rest of the Blue Helmets. The fact that regimes like Libya, DRC, Norks, Burma and Syria even have a say, clearly indicates that if Bolton can't make it work, then the org is history.
Posted by: Rightwing   2005-11-09 11:09  

#5  The UN building is very old and in need of considerable updating. I recommend relocating the entire operation. New digs in Harare would be ideal. Bob has the entire city all spruced up now. The per diem is much, much lower, Air Zim needs the ridership, and the UN wonks will be closer to the action.
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-09 10:08  

#4  much thanks to whoever photoshopped the wilfred brimley stash' onto lord vader causing me to choke on my pumpkin chai latte. well done
Posted by: def con juan   2005-11-09 10:01  

#3  If Annan isn't booted out soon, what shreds of credibility the UN has on any front will vaporize.
With him in there as S-G, it's blatantly, huge-red-flashing-neon-sign obvious that the entire organization is corrupt to the core.
Posted by: mac   2005-11-09 06:02  

#2  The hatred of Bolton from the left during his initial appointment was enough to convince me he was definately the right man for the job.
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-09 00:28  

#1  "has had a good record"

Lol, only when utterly caught with their pants down. Kofi. *spit* What a tool.

I like Bolton more every time I hear him.
Posted by: .com   2005-11-09 00:16  

00:00