| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Bush declares no "rewrite of history on lead-up to war" |
| 2005-11-11 |
| President Bush forcefully attacked critics of the war in Iraq on Friday, accusing them of trying to rewrite history and saying they are undercutting American forces on the front lines. "The stakes in the global war on terror are too high and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges," the president said in his combative Veterans Day speech. Defending the march to war, Bush said that foreign intelligence services and Democrats and Republicans alike were convinced at the time that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. "Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and mislead the American people about why we went to war," Bush said. He said those critics have made those allegations although they know that a Senate investigation "found no evidence" of political pressure to change the intelligence community's assessments related to Saddam's weapons program. He said they also know that the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing Saddam's development and possession of weapons of mass destruction. "More than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate who had access to the same intelligence voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power," Bush said. The president's remarks at the Tobyhanna Army Depot were part of the administration's effort to bolster waning U.S. public support for the war in which at least 2,059 U.S. troops have died. Bush offered a forceful defense of the war in Iraq, saying it is the central front in the war on terror and that extremists are trying to establish a radical Muslim empire extending from Spain to Indonesia. "We will never back down. We will never give in. We will never accept anything less than complete victory," he said Friday. Bush said the United States and its allies are determined to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of extremists and prevent them from gaining control of any country. Bush singled out Syria for particular criticism, saying its government had taken "two disturbing steps" in recent days. He cited the arrest of Syria pro-democracy activist Kamal Labwani and a "strident speech" by President Bashar Assad. In that speech, Assad said his government would cooperate with a U.N. investigation that implicated Syrian officials in the killing of a Lebanese leader, but warned he would no longer "play their game" if Syria "is going to be harmed." Bush said Syria "must stop exporting violence and start importing democracy." |
| Posted by:Sherry |
| #6 I think he should have asked Sen. Clinton if she stil has her night job as a times square hooker or if Kerry still sleeps with little boys. They both have as much credible evidence of the 'Bush Lied' crap. (That is absolutely none!). I guess I would make a piss poor politician.... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2005-11-11 23:24 |
| #5 Amnesia is treatable. Denial is still a river whether or not you remember. |
| Posted by: john 2005-11-11 20:45 |
| #4 time to talk about the consequences to America and the world of losing this war (which would, of course, benefit Howard Dean and the Democrats) and explaining that those who oppose the war don't care about the long-term consequences for short term gain. "You'll have full health care - bandaids, et al - for that decapitation, infidel" |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-11-11 18:56 |
| #3 1. The US acted multi-laterally without UN sanction, but in light of the country's own interpretation of UN resolutions on Iraq. It remains the US position that the UN majority was wrong. 2. The US acted on both much true information on the regional and global threats posed by the Hussein government and on some false information, presented for private and group (Shiite, Kurd, etc) interests, but did so in good faith. The go-with-what-you-know position of the US was reasonable, and yielded bi-partisan support. Deceits presented to US intelligence and authorities are a reflection of the passers of same, and not on US officials. Although over-reaching, in assessment of data, was and is always a factor in government decision making, the fact of the Hussein threat lowered the threshold of choice to intervene. |
| Posted by: CaziFarkus 2005-11-11 15:47 |
| #2 "Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and mislead the American people about why we went to war," Bush said. They'll be claiming it in ten years; look for the new Chomsky novel 'Manufacturing Consent II - The Rush to War' coming soon to a Harvard Square bokkstore near you! |
| Posted by: Raj 2005-11-11 13:58 |
| #1 About time. He needs to keep pounding and name names. Welcome back Karl. |
| Posted by: Throgum Elmoluse7582 2005-11-11 13:53 |