Submit your comments on this article | |||
Britain | |||
Britain: Official bungle may let al-Qaeda suspect go free | |||
2005-11-18 | |||
An alleged al-Qaeda ringleader may have to be freed after the Home Office accepted the blame for bungling his extradition to Italy. ![]() Change the law. Remove any statute of limitations for terrorism and charge him. Mr Farajâs lawyers will fight any attempt to deport him to Libya, claiming that he would face torture.
France is losing patience with Britain over the fate of Rachid Ramda, who has been fighting extradition to Paris for ten years. Mr Ramda, 35, is accused of taking part in bombings on the Paris Métro. Two High Court judges threw out yesterday his claim that moves to deport him are legally flawed. His lawyers are considering taking the case to the House of Lords, which will cause months of further delay. In a separate case a judge ordered that Moutaz Almallah Dabas, 39, a Spaniard wanted for the bombings of Madrid commuter trains in March last year, should be extradited to Spain within ten days under Britainâs new fast-track extradition laws. The deadline is unlikely to be met as Señor Dabasâs lawyers are expected to appeal. He was arrested at his home in Slough, Berkshire, in March on a European extradition warrant 24 hours after Spanish police seized his brother, Mohannad, a Syrian, in Madrid. Britain has failed to extradite a major terrorist suspect since the September 11 attacks. Legal battles have cost the taxpayer an estimated £10 million. | |||
Posted by:ed |
#6 I put this all down to Socialist individuals with ine the Home Office that refuse to extradite regardless of the facts. This is why the Law nad Order apporoach to Terrorists can't and will not work. This is a war. Wars do not slow down for the molasified wheels of justice to turn. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2005-11-18 15:38 |
#5 Arrgghh, "before" should be "when Europe was..." |
Posted by: .com 2005-11-18 13:21 |
#4 The restrictions on where people are deported because other nations have different laws - how long has this been an accepted "international norm"? Can anyone say? I don't recall hearing this in "the good old days" (lol) before Europe was actually allied with the US. It's a rather remarkable notion, when you ponder it, that defies sovereignty - and seems bizarre / PC amok, especially among "allied" democracies. Just wondering if anyone can shed light on when this began... |
Posted by: .com 2005-11-18 13:20 |
#3 *snicker* Mr Farajâs lawyers will fight any attempt to deport him to Libya, claiming that he would face torture. Ahhh...that's too bad. |
Posted by: 2b 2005-11-18 11:25 |
#2 Britain has failed to extradite a major terrorist suspect since the September 11 attacks. Legal battles have cost the taxpayer an estimated £10 million. Bungled is probably not the word for this situation. |
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-11-18 10:05 |
#1 Return him to Italian airspace and release him. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2005-11-18 09:53 |