You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Shiite Leader Says He Wants Federal Region
2005-11-22
A leading Shiite lawmaker suggested Monday that he will pursue a federal region in southern Iraq after next month's elections, pushing forward demands for Shiite autonomy that Sunni leaders fear could tear the country apart. "We have major missions ahead," Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, who heads the largest bloc in the interim parliament, told a gathering of tribal leaders. "The central and southern regions should be achieved after the elections" set for Dec. 15.

According to Iraq's new constitution, the country's 18 provinces — except for Baghdad — can combine to create self-ruled areas. Kurds have such a region in the north and Sunni Arabs fear that a similar Shiite-run mini-state in the south would deprive them of a share of the nation's oil wealth — concentrated in those two areas. Sunni Arabs also fear the system would tear the country apart.
Posted by:Fred

#5  No problem, give him Louisiana.
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-22 18:39  

#4  Ah, but what does it all mean really? I don’t see confederation or devolution as necessarily a bad thing for a Middle Eastern country; it’s just another form of federalism, after all. So long as Iraq has a common currency, federally selected foreign representation, and a high court safeguarding some sort of basic individual rights, a “three nations, one country” situation isn’t necessarily a disaster. We can certainly maintain enough military bases in Iraq to discourage the Iranians from outright invading. The only reason that the Sunni even give a damn about “self-ruled areas” is because of oil money, not out of some kind of patriotism. Let the Sunni, Shia, and Kurds go their own ways so long as they keep up federal appearances and keep the violence to a minimum.
Posted by: Secret Master   2005-11-22 13:36  

#3  this would definitely be a bad thing.
Posted by: bgrebel9   2005-11-22 12:40  

#2  If it weren't for the Iranian influence I would think this would be a good thing.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-11-22 08:55  

#1  Shiite autonomy that Sunni leaders fear could tear the country apart. And leave the Sunni's holding a bag full of desert.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-11-22 08:49  

00:00