You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Al-Qaeda video blasts Muslim scholars
2006-01-18
A six-minute video titled: “A Message from an Immigrant Mujahid to the Scholars of the Nation,” was recently released by al-Qaeda in Iraq, questioning these Muslim scholars for their lack of support to the mujahideen. A masked mujahid sits in front of an image of the Gulf region where Iraq is highlighted in red and yellow, and asks that if the jihad in Iraq is according to Islamic Shari’a, or law, then why have the scholars branded the mujahideen “dissenters” and allowed the people in al-Fallujah to eat tree leaves and urinate blood as many Muslims died from thirst.

As he castigates the scholars, the mujahid, also referred to as a military leader, reminds of the destruction wrought upon the people of al-Qaim, Tal Afar, Samarra, and Rawah, and alleged crimes against Muslim women and children by Americans and Shi’ites. Further, he states: “We are ignorant but we will not have mercy in the day of resurrection. We will hang to your necks and demand our Shari’a rights imposed on you by Allah.”
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  I thought the headline was literal. I'm dissapointed.

Patience, phil_b, patience. As soon as they're done sorting out this nettlesome Sunni - Shiite flap, they'll start whacking their own version of the decadent academic elite within Islamic circles. If all this internecine strife wasn't accompanied by a full calendar of atrocities against the West, I'd just sit back and applaud.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-01-18 22:37  

#2  I thought the headline was literal. I'm dissapointed.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-01-18 06:11  

#1  Colorful stuff. Scholars. Right. I'd say video doesn't pack the punch needed, but that's just me.

The real key is that, en masse, the "scholars" and imams haven't done much of anything except look after their own narrow asses and interests, thus far. Sadr and Sistani both make that case rather well.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-18 03:29  

00:00