You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
John Bolton Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
2006-02-08
John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, is one of two Americans who have been nominated for the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize.
"I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced."
Last year, Democrats and a few Republicans refused to confirm Bolton to the U.N. post, forcing President Bush to resort to a recess appointment.

Bolton and Kenneth R. Timmerman were formally nominated by Sweden's former deputy prime minister Per Ahlmark, for playing a major role in exposing Iran's secret plans to develop nuclear weapons.
Will the left now attack Sweden's embassies for this outrage against their most beloved award?
They documented Iran's secret nuclear buildup and revealed Iran's "repeated lying" and false reports to the International Atomic Energy Agency, a press release said.

Bolton formerly served as U.S. undersecretary for arms control and international security, and he authored the Proliferation Security Initiative, an international effort to block WMD shipments. The effort eventually unmasked the secret nuclear network directed by Pakistan nuclear scientist A. Q. Khan.

Timmerman, an independent researcher, has written extensively on Iran's nuclear activities for more than 20 years. His report for the Simon Wiesenthal Center in 1992 first detailed Iran's ties to A.Q. Khan. His most recent book, "Countdown to Crisis: The Coming Nuclear Showdown with Iran," was published last year.

In June 2005, Senate Republicans fell six votes in their second effort to end a Democrat filibuster of Bolton's nomination to serve as U.N. ambassador. Bolton's supporters complained that Bolton was the target of a Democrat smear campaign. A number of Democrats and some Republicans complained about Bolton's brusque dealings with co-workers and underlings. One of Bolton's Republican critics - Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio - now says he thinks Bolton is doing a good job. "I spend a lot of time with John on the phone. I think he is really working very constructively to move forward," Reuters quoted Voinovich as saying on Monday. Voinovich added that he's still watching Bolton - but, "at this stage of the game I am pleased with the progress that is being made here and the team that he has gathered together here."

In May 2006, the thought that Bolton might be confirmed as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations almost brought Voinovich to tears. Voinovich's emotional moment came one day after he sent a letter to his fellow senators, telling them, "In these dangerous times, we cannot afford to put at risk our nation's ability to successfully wage and win the war on terror with a controversial and ineffective ambassador to the United Nations."
Posted by:

#15  Well if Mugabe doesn't win the Nobbie nom, he'll surely win the 2006 World Co**suckelry award for meanness, racism, and nation breaking.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-02-08 22:06  

#14  better to nominate Kojo, Mugabe, and Chavez to totally disrupt the process: "so many worthy candidates! How do I choose?"
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-08 21:08  

#13  True. PIMF. ;-)
Posted by: .com   2006-02-08 21:04  

#12  Ture -- I was only referring to the notion that Bolton stands a snowball's chance in Hell of winning. Heh.
Posted by: .com   2006-02-08 21:04  

#11  to coin a phrase: "I have a dream..."

mine isn't perverted by race-based hustlers and partisan BDS koolaid drinkers though
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-08 21:01  

#10  Lol - now Ima thinking yer sleep-walking, lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-02-08 20:49  

#9  better he wins and turns it down based on past awardees :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-08 20:46  

#8  Oh he won't win, Jackal, lol...

What amuses me about this is how it will cause indigestion among those who do think it matters and that the previous winners deserved it. ;-)
Posted by: .com   2006-02-08 20:30  

#7  I thought people here liked Bolton? Why would any support putting this man in with Arafish and Jimmeh?
Posted by: Jackal   2006-02-08 20:19  

#6  For some reason, I read that as "I feel a great disturbance in the French..."

Seems more appropriate in some way.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-08 15:14  

#5  I wonder if Bolten reads Rantburg or has seen this depiction of him. I think he would be proud and inspired.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-02-08 14:40  

#4  Community Relations thanks to the nominating committee: Halliburton is committed to being a good corporate citizen and neighbor because doing so reflects our core values -- along with our understanding of the responsibility we have to the communities in which we live and work. Community involvement helps strengthen our Company by building and maintaining relationships of trust with our neighbors. It also fosters positive morale among our employees by giving them an opportunity to show that Halliburton cares about making a difference in our communities through substantial contributions of financial, time and "energy" resources. This is why we say that Halliburton has "the energy to help."
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-02-08 13:15  

#3  
Its about time for a Nobel War Prize.
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-02-08 13:09  

#2  Maybe they can share it with Centcom.
Posted by: Angaviting Ebbumble1629   2006-02-08 12:51  

#1  These two have my vote (if there was such a thing as a vote).

But they are on the wrong side in seeking to rid Iran of nuke weapons and reforming the UN. Ultimately, some yaahoos who want to coddle the Moolahs and who want the thugs to run the UN HRC will win the Nobel "Peace" Prize.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-02-08 11:30  

00:00