You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Seattle Times Says Bush Administration Like INGSOC
2006-02-17
Ryan Blethen Times editorial columnist
The resemblance grows between the Bush administration and the sinister, monolithic political party INGSOC, from George Orwell's novel "1984," with every twisted and evasive defense for the violation of American civil rights. Bush and Co.'s battle against terrorism has turned into a power grab and a war on Americans. Fear and contorted language are the weapons of choice.
Ummm... I'd call the "fear and contorted language" as coming from the other side. People like the Seattle Times, in fact.
The administration's assertive actions after 9/11 might have made sense in the raw aftermath of nearly 3,000 dead. With time and distance comes perspective.
Despite the time and distance, they're still dead. Despite the time and distance, our enemies still want to destroy us. You're supposed to be a newspaper. Read the goddamn news.
Those new presidential controls awarded to help ensure the safety of Americans now look more like the political clubs wielded by INGSOC.
"Socrates was a man, therefore all men are Socrates."
Orwell might have got the year wrong, but his nightmarish vision of a super-nation at perpetual war, dominated by a government only concerned about control and party preservation, could gain purchase in 2006.
The mere utterance of the words belies the statement. In Orwell's world, the writer would have been carried off and reeducated, if not simply disposed of. But poseurs like this like to demonstrate their "bravery" by bearding their enemies, secure in the knowledge that their enemies won't slap them down. Rather than being carried off, in Orwell's world the writer would likely have been writing propaganda for the regime.
I hear more of Newspeak, the restrictive language created by INGSOC, with every presidential explanation as to why the government feels compelled to spy on Americans. Orwell wrote that the idea of Newspeak was to restrict the language to the point that people would have to think in the limited language of the party.
Orwell was actually pretty prescient in the way he imagined Political Correctness.
In true INGSOC fashion, the administration has used Bushspeak to spin a story broken by The New York Times about a domestic-spying program run by the National Security Agency and approved by executive order soon after 9/11 into a necessary program needed to weed out the deeply integrated terrorists living next door.
He's big on the "domestic spying" angle, even though one end of the phone calls would have been connected to a turban. The turbans, y'see, deserve to have their calls to residents of the U.S.A. sacrosanct. That's because if somebody blows up Seattle, why, just give it a few years and time and distance will make it not so important, and certainly not deserving of any kind of counteraction.
The timing was curious when, last week, Bush revealed that a terrorist plot was thwarted in 2002. Bush talked about the plot the same day stories surfaced about the doubts a secret surveillance court judge had about the legality of domestic spying. Of course, an administration spokesperson danced around the question of whether the NSA program was involved in stopping the terrorist plot.
Liars and thieves, the lot of 'em!"
The use of powerful and well-placed words and images worked for INGSOC. Its slogan — war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength — fits like a truncheon in the cradle of shattered bone with Bush's recent State of the Union address:
War is peace

"There is no peace in retreat."
Takes more imagination than I have to connect the two statements...
Freedom is slavery

"The terrorist surveillance program has helped prevent terrorist attacks. It remains essential to the security of America."
The first statement's a mere oxymoron. The second is a statement of fact. If Ryan has evidence that it's not true, then he should present it. I suspect he has nothing but his opinion and his hysteria.
Ignorance is strength

"... We have benefited from responsible criticism and counsel offered by members of Congress of both parties ... Yet, there is a difference between responsible criticism that aims for success, and defeatism that refuses to acknowledge anything but failure."
There's nothing in there about ignorance. In fact, Bush was stating that he does receive advice, and that he discounts the nattering and the spew from dipshits like Ryan.
Political doublespeak is nothing new, but has become a real threat to democracy in the hands of this administration.
This threat is currently visible only to trained observers like Ryan, but just you wait...
Bush has taken communication strategy to new heights, said David Domke, associate professor of communications at the University of Washington. "This administration has become preeminent in crafting messages for political gain," Domke said.
It looks to me like Bush is under continuous attack domestically from people like Ryan, including the press, the Democratic party, various moonbats, and the peculiarly foul specimens like Ramsey Clark who hate the United States for what it is. Attack calls for counterattack. The fact that he responds by refuting their arguments just makes them furious.
The Republicans have made no secret about what they will run on this year. A recent Pew poll showed that Americans believe the Democrats could lead the nation better on every issue except national security. Bush aide Karl Rove has given speeches about national security and the president skips across the nation talking about the importance of spying on Americans to keep us safe. This strategy works only if the electorate is fearful that a hostile world is ready to overrun America.
The hostile world periodically states intent to do that very thing. Where the hell have you been, Ryan? Don't you believe them?
Bush's fear-mongering resembles a version of INGSOC's Two Minutes (of) Hate, in which party members watch a video of legions of the enemy army marching behind a bleating political enemy.
Two minutes of hate might be appropriate, since Orwell took an observed phenomenon — Nazis and Commies and Fascists, who're all fond of doing such things — and made them INGSOC's bugaboo. But that doesn't mean they're not fond of doing such things in the real world, and it doesn't mean they're not intent on defeating us in this very real world. In Orwell's novel they weren't real. In ours they are. You get the difference?... I thought you wouldn't.
American democracy has buckled under the weight of Americans voting scared, a weak press diluted because of consolidation by mega-public companies, and no real political alternative. It does not matter that the administration and, by extension, the Republican Party are only doing what is needed to hold on in November and again in the 2008 presidential election. Their actions are beginning to eclipse our civil rights, potentially reducing freedom to a dim flicker.
Can we get a paper bag over here? Ryan's hyperventilating.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#11  And to think that the Seattle Times is the more rational of the two major local papers...
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2006-02-17 23:32  

#10  SeaTac Honcho: BushCo Double-Plus Ungood!
Posted by: Omerese Elmomoque6994   2006-02-17 21:12  

#9  WhacKLackoff!!
Posted by: Captain America   2006-02-17 14:48  

#8  Complain all ya want folks, but I don't think the boy's gonna get canned...

It's not every day that a reporter with less than two years of experience becomes an editor, managing outlying bureaus at a state's biggest newspaper. But not every reporter is Ryan Blethen, son of Seattle Times publisher Frank Blethen...

Gee, thanks, Dad!
Posted by: tu3031   2006-02-17 14:14  

#7  It's been said many times before by those much wiser than me, but I'll say it again here: if George W. Bush really is the second coming of Adolf Hitler, why hasn't Michael Moore been made into a lampshade.
Posted by: Mike   2006-02-17 13:59  

#6  Cantwell might be in trouble, they barely elected a dem governor, Seattle sees the writing on the wall.
Posted by: Sandy P   2006-02-17 13:03  

#5  Let's see, this is the same Seattle Times that believes in counting the votes until a Democrat is elected? Considering the travesty that was perpetrated in King County during the last election, they really shouldn't toss around Orwellian comparisons. The Washington State Democratic Party is a thoroughly criminal organization that should be prosecuted through RICO.
Posted by: RWV   2006-02-17 12:41  

#4  It does not matter that the administration and, by extension, the Republican Party are only doing what is needed to hold on in November and again in the 2008 presidential election.

Insert the word "Democrat" where the word "Republican" is and this hack wouldn't have anything to say about it. And if he did, he would first get fired by his paper then audited by the IRS. What a fool.
Posted by: Secret Master   2006-02-17 10:38  

#3  Msg for RBers in Seattle:
"Climb Mt Ranier"
"Climb Mt Ranier"
Posted by: .com   2006-02-17 09:21  

#2  This is more of that Lakoff drivel. "Framing" your ideas only works if you have actual ideas in the frame.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-02-17 09:18  

#1  Bush's fear-mongering resembles a version of INGSOC's Two Minutes (of) Hate, in which party members watch a video of legions of the enemy army marching behind a bleating political enemy.

Of course the only video we do get to see is laced with hatred of Bush and his works by the MSM. So who really is INGSOC? Anyone catch the now 'old' new pictures of Abu Ghrab and not the images of Mohammad? If you won't show one because it will 'inflame' why the other?
Posted by: Choluger Jock5886   2006-02-17 09:10  

00:00