Submit your comments on this article | |||
Arabia | |||
‘Objections to DPW takeover is a backlash on 9/11': Karen Hughes | |||
2006-02-21 | |||
DUBAI - US lawmakers’ objections to a Dubai company’s takeover of US port operations is a backlash from the Sept. 11 attacks, not an expression of wider anti-Arab sentiment among American politicians, the top US envoy for public diplomacy said here on Monday. In a discussion with reporters, Undersecretary of State Karen Hughes said she didn’t believe the gathering objections represent a general Islamophobia among American lawmakers, as a Dubai newspaper’s opinion article Monday alleged. “I would hope that is not the case,” Hughes said. “I hope the people of the United Arab Emirates and the government will understand that in a democracy, there is a process of debate.”
Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, who plans to discuss the lawmakers’ objections during a visit to the Emirates this week, has pushed for a more open discussion of the security oversight DP World has undergone. “Secretary Rice says we will have to go to Capitol Hill and get the administration to explain a little more fully the thorough review that was done,” Hughes said. “The administration will be doing that, I’m sure, in the days ahead.” Newspaper opinion articles in Dubai have blamed the US backlash on political grandstanding ahead of this year’s congressional elections and a general American sense of “Islamophobia.” An op-ed article on Monday in a local newspaper said the controversy demonstrates that “Islamophobia is rising and has become like an infectious disease that spreads amid political and media circles in the West.”
She spoke out Monday against caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed ( Americans, Hughes said, refrain from using racial and ethnic slurs not because they are outlawed, but because of a general sense of decency. “I think that could be a model” for the mainly European newspapers that printed the offending caricatures, she said.
| |||
Posted by:Steve White |
#5 The UAE is running out of oil; hence the last minute splashy developments (that they won't be able to pay for). No oil: no leverage; no interest; no need for public diplomacy. Can't wait for my electric car. |
Posted by: CaziFarkus 2006-02-21 19:23 |
#4 I dunno, RC. I think they're at least mildly offensive, too. I just think the muslims need to get over it. |
Posted by: too true 2006-02-21 18:26 |
#3 She spoke out Monday against caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed (PTUI PBUH) that have sparked deadly protests across the Muslim world. “The cartoons were offensive. I can understand why Muslims are offended by them,” she said. Fire her. She's not representing us overseas; she's abasing herself to her future paymasters. |
Posted by: Robert Crawford 2006-02-21 10:30 |
#2 The cartoons were offensive? C'mon Karen, get real. |
Posted by: doc 2006-02-21 09:11 |
#1 You think the lefties would stop if some masked Catholics kidnapped Chuck Schumer, gave him a Nick Berg haircut, and sent the videotape to Fox News? |
Posted by: mac 2006-02-21 07:08 |