You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lebanon admits it okayed arms transfer to Hezbollah
2006-02-26
Actually, they never denied it. They just tried to redefine it.
The Lebanese government publicly admitted recently, for the first time, that it had permitted the delivery of a convoy of arms from Syria to Hezbollah.
I'm not sure why the Lebs seem to have this desire for national suicide...
The United Nations responded by issuing a condemnation.
But not a strongly-worded one.
Whoa! That'll show 'em!
According to Lebanese sources, Lebanese soldiers halted a convoy of arms-laden trucks from Syria at an army checkpoint in the Lebanon Valley on January 31. However, the Lebanese Defense Ministry ordered the soldiers to allow the convoy to proceed. A report on this incident then reached the UN's special envoy to the Middle East, Terje Larsen, in New York, and Larsen instructed his staff to investigate. Eventually, the Lebanese government admitted both that it had allowed the convoy to pass, and that the arms had been destined for Hezbollah. The UN then published a statement condemning the Lebanese government for having blatantly violated UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which, inter alia, calls for disarming the country's militias.
That did a lot of good, didn't it?
The arms in the convoy originated apparently from Iran.
That doesn't surprise me in the least...
It is not known how many trucks were in the convoy or what arms they carried. Arms smuggling from Syria into Lebanon has been going on for years, seemingly with the knowledge of the Lebanese government.
Syria's just the transit point. They'd come directly from Iran, if Iran had borders with Lebanon.
Iran doesn't have a border with Syria, either ...
In this fashion, huge quantities of arms from Iran and Syria have reached Hezbollah in recent years, including massive quantities of Katyushas and other rockets that are stationed in batteries in southern Lebanon and are aimed at Israel. However, this is the first time that the Lebanese have publicly admitted the existence of these convoys, much less that it has been authorizing arms deliveries to Hezbollah. The convoy's passage was apparently approved by the office of Defense Minister Elias Murr, in coordination with the office of Lebanon's pro-Syrian president, Emile Lahoud.
We could have guessed that connection.
According to a statement published by the UN on February 13, the UN forces in Lebanon were initially unaware of the convoy's passage, though reports of the incident reached them later. When the news reached Larsen, he demanded clarifications from Beirut, adding that if the reports were true, the action constituted a gross violation of Resolution 1559. In response, Prime Minister Fuad Siniora's office confirmed the convoy's arrival, but did not specify for whom the arms were destined.
He said they went to "the resistance," which is Lebspeak for "Hezbollah." Hezbollah's not a militia, y'see. It's a "resistance movement," or sometimes freedumb fighters.
At the same time, the UN contacted the Lebanese Defense Ministry, which informed it that the arms were destined for Hezbollah. The ministry added that the army permitted the transfer of weapons to the "resistance" forces - i.e. Hezbollah - in accordance with a decision made by the Lebanese government. Following receipt of this information, the UN published a second statement, in which it condemned the incident as a grave violation of Resolution 1559, expressed concern and demanded that Beirut take steps to prevent a repetition. Hezbollah claims that it is not a "militia," and therefore, the resolution's demand that all Lebanese militias be disarmed does not apply to the organization.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
"Nope. Not us."
This interpretation has also been adopted by the Syrian government, Lahoud and several Lebanese cabinet ministers. As a result, Hezbollah has enjoyed preferential treatment compared to other Lebanese militias.
As far as I know, it's the only one still under arms, with the exception of the Paleostinians.
In contrast, the Lebanese army has at times confiscated arms shipments to Palestinian organizations based in Lebanon. In December 2005, for instance, after a Palestinian group with ties to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's organization, Al-Qaida in Iraq, fired Katyushas at Israel, Lebanon arrested some members of the group and confiscated their weapons.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Me? I live in the outer suburbs in the middle of the American Midwest. We've got an Airforce base, though.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-26 23:08  

#6  Get smart Goumgrou. Port Security has nothing to do with Port Facility Leases.
Posted by: JW   2006-02-26 21:38  

#5  I wonder if you live near a major sea port, TW.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-02-26 19:23  

#4  Too late.
Posted by: 6   2006-02-26 11:28  

#3  Don't be an ass, gromgoru.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-26 10:56  

#2  I'm sure George (religion of peace) will forgive.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-02-26 07:43  

#1  I don't imagine the Lebanese were in any position to refuse permission for the convoy to transit the country. To do so would mean standing up to both Syria, which I suspect still has men under arms on the Lebanese side of the border, and Iran, which owns Hezbollah. We don't really think Iran (and Hezbollah) would respond with understanding to such an action, do we?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-26 05:51  

00:00