You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Chirac throws in with US
2006-02-27
As George W. Bush looks out on an unfriendly world, where can he find new allies to support America's tarnished foreign policy? Step forward Jacques Chirac, who in his final year in office acts as though he wants to be as good a friend to Washington as Tony Blair. After five years of trying to build an anti-U.S. front with Germany—splitting Europe down the middle—the French president is reaching into his diplomatic toolbox and coming up with initiatives that are increasingly in tune with America's global agenda.

So, as the U.S. president arrives in New Delhi with the aim of building up India as a 21st-century regional superpower capable of rivaling China, Bush will find that his path and message have been smoothed by Chirac. Just returned from India himself, the French president struck a blow for the U.S. administration's strategy by strongly supporting a rapid buildup of India's nuclear-energy ambitions. He signed an agreement to export French nuclear know-how, giving India the chance to obtain nonpolluting energy for its accelerating industrial and domestic needs and reduce its dependence on imported oil. The U.S. Congress has yet to lift its ban on nuke exports to India. But if Washington is as serious about assisting India's nuclear option as it seems, then France's willingness to partner in the effort looks like welcome news indeed.

But Chirac has gone further. In a little-noticed speech on French nuclear doctrine earlier this year, he announced that France's nuclear-weapons capability should be reckoned with by states tempted to sponsor terrorism on French soil. Although wrapped up in Gaullist tropes, this amounts to something akin to a pre-emptive-strike doctrine for Europe, not far removed from the U.S. policy that caused such a flap after 9/11. Belated or not, it echoes Washington's determination to tell terrorists and their state sponsors that there are lines not to be crossed.

In the Middle East, France and America are working intimately on Lebanon. They are pointing a collective finger at Syria and forcing U.N. resolutions demanding that it stop trying to control its neighbor. Chirac was a close friend of the murdered Lebanese prime minister, Rafik Hariri, who kept a good chunk of his $6 billion fortune in France. Furious Hizbullah leaders in Beirut, supported by Damascus, denounce the French president as a poodle of Washington. Even more significant is the new joint front on Iran. Chirac has led Europe's condemnations of Tehran's threats against Israel and has been instrumental in referring its nuclear challenge to the Security Council.

Little of this is reflected in the French press, which cleaves to its diet of America-bashing pur et dur. But Chirac understands that posturing over Iraq has not protected France from Islamofascism. Militant Islamist preachers are active among the nation's 5 million Muslim citizens, many of whom willingly believe that all their problems will get better if they follow Sharia and reject French secularism. Chirac also reacted swiftly when a French Jew was recently tortured to death after being kidnapped by a thuggish gang who believed that, because he was Jewish, his family by definition was rich enough to pay a massive ransom. This vestige of the very worst anti-Semitism shocked France and may serve to wake up intellectuals blinded to the excesses of radical Islamists by their own anti-Americanism.

And Chirac has his own Abu Ghraib. France's elite antiterrorist police face accusations of torturing Arab detainees suspected of terrorist links. A top general has been suspended after an enemy combatant held by his soldiers was murdered in the Ivory Coast, where young French troops, as frightened and far from home as American troops in Iraq, are all that is preventing a descent into anarchic bloodshed. Anti-U.S. politicians in Switzerland and Strasbourg may paint America as a nation of bloody torturers, but Chirac knows that in the fight against terrorism both soldiers and security agencies make mistakes. He is not joining in the U.S.-bashing on this front.

Thus, France in 2006 is a very different country in terms of foreign policy from the France that wanted to lead Europe, and much of the world, against America in 2003. Germany's new chancellor, Angela Merkel, does not share the keenness of her predecessor, Gerhard Schroder, for selling arms to China or turning a blind eye to the erosion of democracy in Russia—prompting France to follow suit. Meanwhile, other EU nations like Britain and Spain are economic success stories in part because they have embraced U.S.-style free markets. After investing so heavily in anti-Americanism, leading nowhere, Chirac finally appears to be cutting his losses. Perhaps it's time to put french fries back on the menu in Washington.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#23  but watch your backs at all times. Every move, declaration has to be scrutinized. Jacques, this is not necessary among allies. I trust Aussie PM Howard to say what he thinks and does. France has a lot to make up for....backstabbing lies costing American lives among them. If there's a sea change, then welcome, and don't begrudge us our worst suspicions for the next couple decades, eh?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-27 21:34  

#22  yup.
Posted by: lotp   2006-02-27 19:35  

#21  As we sit here and bash the French, in my opinion most deservingly so, we all bitched that the French need to dot this or that. Now they are turning to try to work together, should we give them a big "No thanks"? Are we just venting or stupid? The French are weak, cowards, and not trustworthy, but they are a nation that has the capability to sell Nuclear technology and biotech capabilities to our enemies. We must pinch our noses and deal with them, bring them on to the teamm, or at least to the table, and try to keep them from becoming a muzzie state in europe with full up nuke capabilities.
Posted by: 49 pan   2006-02-27 19:32  

#20  Chirac throws in with US. It's time for self-reflection for US---what are we doing wrong?
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-02-27 18:51  

#19  2b, I think part of that is Bush letting the EU3 handle Iran multilaterally. They got nothing but egg on their faces.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-02-27 17:22  

#18  I think RWV gets to the heart of the matter.

I would suggest that the Iraq war forced the French to finally see that their anti-West bias is nothing more than politicians distracting from their own failures, in exactly the same way that Muslims leaders use Jews.

I understand your point, but I do not believe that the Iraq war caused the extreme alienation between the French and Americans as the French already completely secure in their sense of superiority. Though I will grant that it did cause extreme alienation between the Americans towards the French.

Rather, I think that American response to the war on terror v/s the abject failure of the French governments supposedly superior diplomatic handling of the Iraq crisis forced the French to see their own government in a brand new light.
Posted by: 2b   2006-02-27 17:18  

#17  "Never will I believe that the soul of France is dead! Never will I believe that her place amongst the greatest nations of the world has been lost forever." Winston Churchill

Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-02-27 17:03  

#16  "One difference between French appeasement and American appeasement is that France pays ransom in cash and gets its hostages back while the United States pays ransom in arms and gets additional hostages taken."-William Saffire
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-02-27 16:56  

#15  2B - I used "extreme" deliberately - meaning more overt, more widespread in society etc.


"To some of us, his oil for food scams, bribes, coddling dictators, the fact he'd be in jail if he had lost the election, and that his blame America stance is no different than the Muslim blame the Jews stance, created alienation long before the Iraq war. Not all of us thought he was cool just because he blamed America"

Number 1, I was focusing on state to state relations, not individuals. Second, I was focusing on French hostility to the US, not the other way around. Since the posted article is about a(purported) change in FRENCH attitudes and policies, I would have thought that was clear. Sorry if my prose was imprecise.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-02-27 16:50  

#14  A day late and a euro dollar short.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-27 15:30  

#13  "I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me."

-- G. S. Patton
Posted by: Steve White   2006-02-27 13:58  

#12  The French have never really been our friends. Imperial France occasionally helped us against their blood enemies, the British. But since the French Revolution, never. We bailed them out twice in WWI and WWII, but that was only because they were allied with the British. That help was always resented by the elites. France dropped out of NATO. In 1966, France withdrew its military from NATO and demanded that all non-French NATO troops leave France (relocating NATO HQ to Brussels). During the Cold War, France was always cozier with the Russians than the West. When I was in the AF, France was one of the countries with whom we could not share information because it was assumed that what was in Paris today would be in Moscow tomorrow.

With his approval rating hovering around 20%, Chirac has decided to become our friend only because he has lost all support internally.
Posted by: RWV   2006-02-27 13:32  

#11  The fact that the extreme alienation between the US and France was over Iraq

You make it sound like the extreme alienation started with the war on Iraq. In fact it is the Iraq war that has forced the anti-American drum bangers like Chirac to get real as their citizens demand they do something, besides blaming the US to deal with their terrorist threats, which are far more severe than our own.

To some of us, his oil for food scams, bribes, coddling dictators, the fact he'd be in jail if he had lost the election, and that his blame America stance is no different than the Muslim blame the Jews stance, created alienation long before the Iraq war. Not all of us thought he was cool just because he blamed America.
Posted by: 2b   2006-02-27 12:48  

#10  i doubt very much that the arabs (other than the Lebanese Maronites and a handful of secular Algerians) and the Chinese are interested in building a francophonie.

I think this is a tribute to among other things A. Good, if unheralded, diplomacy by the Bush admin, esp Rice. B. The fact that the extreme alienation between the US and France was over Iraq, and now that Iraq is moving to self rule, its simply not the same kind of issue. C. Putin going a bit too far, making him a more difficult ally for Chirac. D. The elections in UK and German - Chirac is stuck with Blair, and has lost Schroeder. E. The actions of our adversaries - from Iran, to Hamas, to the cartoon riots - our enemies are pressing us together.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-02-27 11:31  

#9  It doesn't matter who's in charge. The French will not be our allies regardless of appearances. They are interested in building a Francophonie alternative to les anglo-saxons with the Arabs, Chinese and any third world thugs who would like to join them. They are an enemy who is unable to fight with us but happy to provide a second would veneer to those who can.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-02-27 11:18  

#8  Screw Chirac, bring on Nicky Skarz.
Posted by: mojo   2006-02-27 10:56  

#7  Better to have a declared enemy than a back-stabbing friend. Go to hell, France.
Posted by: BH   2006-02-27 10:07  

#6  Too little, too late.
Posted by: Grinter Fluns8529   2006-02-27 10:03  

#5  No thanks. Relations with France should be at arms length with the other hand pinching our nose. In 20-30 years, the French will be in a very nasty civil war. The last thing America needs is for the French to think, yet again, they have a right to Americans to come and pull their nuts out of the fire. The smartest thing we could do is to raise tariffs on French goods so that industrial infrastructure will be encouraged to migrate out of France and out of harm's way. The best the French can hope for is that the Germans will come and occupy them permanently.
Posted by: ed   2006-02-27 08:13  

#4  Chirac throws in with US in last ditch effort, is how it should read.
Posted by: Hupoluger Jaimp3665   2006-02-27 08:04  

#3   In a little-noticed speech on French nuclear doctrine
?
Posted by: 6   2006-02-27 07:48  

#2  Yeah. Let's trust Chirac. That's a grand idea.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-02-27 07:30  

#1  But Chirac is on his way out. Who comes after Chirac and what will his policy toward the US be?
Posted by: Jonathan   2006-02-27 07:26  

00:00