You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
The Dark Side of China's Rise
2006-02-27
The only thing rising faster than China is the hype about China. In January, the People's Republic's gross domestic product (GDP) exceeded that of Britain and France, making China the world's fourth-largest economy. In December, it was announced that China replaced the United States as the world's largest exporter of technology goods. Many experts predict that the Chinese economy will be second only to the United States by 2020, and possibly surpass it by 2050.

Upon close examination, China's record loses some of its luster. China's economic performance since 1979, for example, is actually less impressive than that of its East Asian neighbors, such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, during comparable periods of growth. Its banking system, which costs Beijing about 30 percent of annual GDP in bailouts, is saddled with nonperforming loans and is probably the most fragile in Asia. The comparison with India is especially striking. In six major industrial sectors (ranging from autos to telecom), from 1999 to 2003, Indian companies delivered rates of return on investment that were 80 to 200 percent higher than their Chinese counterparts. The often breathless conventional wisdom on China's economic reform overlooks major flaws that render many predictions about China's trajectory misleading, if not downright hazardous.

The Chinese economy is not merely inefficient; it has also fallen victim to crony capitalism with Chinese characteristics—the marriage between unchecked power and illicit wealth. And corruption is worst where the hand of the state is strongest. The most corrupt sectors in China, such as power generation, tobacco, banking, financial services, and infrastructure, are all state-controlled monopolies. None of that is unprecedented, of course. Tycoons in Russia, after all, have looted the state's natural resources. China, at least, boasts genuine private entrepreneurs who have built prosperous companies. But China's politically connected tycoons have cashed in on China's real estate boom; nearly half of Forbes' list of the 100 richest individuals in China in 2004 were real estate developers.

Various indicators, pieced together from official sources, suggest endemic graft within the state. The number of "large-sum cases" (those involving monetary amounts greater than $6,000) nearly doubled between 1992 and 2002, indicating that more wealth is being looted by corrupt officials. The rot appears to be spreading up the ranks, as more and more senior officials have been ensnared. The number of officials at the county level and above prosecuted by the government rose from 1,386 in 1992 to 2,925 in 2002.

An optimist might believe that these figures reveal stronger enforcement rather than metastasizing corruption, but the evidence suggests otherwise. Dishonest officials today face little risk of serious punishment. On average, 140,000 party officials and members were caught in corruption scandals each year in the 1990s, and 5.6 percent of these were criminally prosecuted. In 2004, 170,850 party officials and members were implicated, but only 4,915 (or 2.9 percent) were subject to criminal prosecution. The culture of official impunity is thriving in China.

What's worse, corruption is now assuming forms normally associated with regime decay. Corruption involving large numbers of officials used to be rare. Now it's rampant. Regional data suggest that large-scale corruption rings account for 30 to 60 percent of all the cases of graft uncovered by authorities. In some of the worst instances, entire provincial, municipal, and county governments were found to be tainted.

As ominous as the corruption itself is what these scandals are beginning to reveal about the government's legitimacy. In their confessions, corrupt officials often blame their misdeeds on a loss of faith in communism. There is anecdotal evidence that senior party officials have taken to consulting fortune-tellers about their political careers. The ruling elite in China, it appears, is drifting and insecure. Fearful about what the future may hold, some officials do not want to wait even a few years to turn their power into wealth. In 2002, almost 20 percent of the officials prosecuted for bribery and nearly 30 percent of those punished for abuse of power were younger than 35. In Henan Province in 2003, 43 percent of local party bosses caught up in corruption were between 40 and 50 years old (as compared with 32 percent older than 50). China has seen its future leaders, and a disproportionate number of them are on the take.
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#3  Its banking system, which costs Beijing about 30 percent of annual GDP in bailouts, is saddled with nonperforming loans and is probably the most fragile in Asia.

Some estimates regarding their bad debt range from 500 billion to a whopping one trillion dollars.

In Henan Province in 2003, 43 percent of local party bosses caught up in corruption were between 40 and 50 years old (as compared with 32 percent older than 50).

Henan province. Does that name ring a bell? Home to the world's largest medically caused AIDS crisis, the Henan 'bloodheads' have yet to be visibly prosecuted.

http://www.hrichina.org/public/contents/article?revision%5fid=1888&item%5fid=1887

When first publicized by activist Wan Yanhai, the state's first response was to arrest him. Slow reaction and coverup mentality allowed many of the infected plasma donors to migrate into the major urban hubs without any awareness of their infection.

China is faced with a monumental AIDS crisis the like of which only Africa has been cursed with, to date. Combined with staggering bad bank debt, shabby infrastructure (the Three Gorges Dam face is already exhibiting cracks) and a potential AIDS pandemic, China remains the pissh0le it has always been. A micron thick coating of glossy lacquer changes nothing.

Under no circumstances must China be allowed to appropriate Taiwan's fabulous wealth in order to prop up this tottering Everest of dung.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-27 16:01  

#2  It didn't effect us as much since we have a free market. Monopolies held by the state are very suseptible to corruption (see Oil-for-Food). The Soviet Union had a very similar problem in the 70s and along with a crumbling infastructure helped their downfall. China has a decent infastructure in the cities, but a pathetic one in the rual areas. Farmers are revolting from being screwed by government companies polluting their farms and then real estate groups pushing them out. The only thing really holding China together is the people in the cities and their easy access to lots and lots of capitalistic goods. With the 30% GDP being spent on bad loans, this is not a sustainable crutch as soon taxes will rise above what city people will be willing to pay and they start protesting too. The government will either try to run over them with tanks or cut back on loans to appease them. Both are roads to communist disaster. Once the buisnesses are cut off, they will crumble and the cities will be awash with civil unrest. China is in deep doo-doo and they may see a militaristic jont the salve to keep the country together while painful reforms are enacted.
Posted by: mmurray821   2006-02-27 14:18  

#1  The only thing rising faster than China is the hype about China.

Truer words were never spoken.

Regional data suggest that large-scale corruption rings account for 30 to 60 percent of all the cases of graft uncovered by authorities. In some of the worst instances, entire provincial, municipal, and county governments were found to be tainted.

I wouldn't let that fool me. Anyone remember JFK's electoral victories in Illinois and Texas in 1960? Entire state, municpal, and county governments were on the take in the United States well into the 70s, and that didn't seem to affect us much.
Posted by: gromky   2006-02-27 13:33  

00:00