| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| NYT sues for more info on NSA wiretapping program |
| 2006-02-28 |
| The New York Times sued the Department of Defense on Monday, saying the government has refused to turn over records related to its domestic warrantless surveillance program. In its federal lawsuit, the Times asked the court to order the government to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request requiring it to release documents or provide a lawful reason why it cannot. The Times said a Dec. 16 letter to the Defense Department requested all internal memos, e-mails and legal memoranda and opinions since Sept. 11, 2001, related to the National Security Agency spying program. The department is the parent agency of the NSA. The spying program was revealed by the Times in a story in December. Maj. Susan Idziak, a Defense Department spokeswoman, said the department would work closely with the Department of Justice on litigation regarding the matter. The newspaper said it asked for meeting logs, calendar items and notes related to discussions of the program, including meetings held by Vice President Dick Cheney and his staff with members of Congress and telecommunications executives. It also requested all complaints of abuse or possible violations in the operations of the program or the legal rationale behind it. And it sought the names and descriptions of people or groups identified through the use of the program and a description of relevant episodes used to identify the targets of the intercepts. The lawsuit said the Defense Department acknowledged receipt of the request on Dec. 30, 2005, but the response, required in 20 business days, never came. |
| Posted by:Dan Darling |
| #6 TW - Of course, you are correct. I shouldn't let the NYT peg my 'Outrage Meter'. Serenity now! Serenity now! |
| Posted by: DMFD 2006-02-28 22:56 |
| #5 DMFD, I think the word you want is appropriate. The proper response, the one someone like me is capable of giving, is "No." I fear I lack the vocabulary for the appropriate response. ;-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-02-28 20:30 |
| #4 TW - the 'proper response' to a newspapers request for classified national security data during wartime is probably unprintable even in Rantburg. Imagine the NYT in 1943 suing the government to find out about this 'Manhattan Project', and 'Ultra' thing. |
| Posted by: DMFD 2006-02-28 20:21 |
| #3 WE should require them to publish the "insensitive cartoons" first. That should be the end of their lawsuit! Al |
| Posted by: Frozen Al 2006-02-28 12:56 |
| #2 Of course, why didn't you say so? And here are the nuclear targeting codes in case of a Russian launch. And here are the ones in case of a Chinese launch, and here ... |
| Posted by: Perfessor 2006-02-28 09:24 |
| #1 Surely the only proper response in a situation involving classified, national security information is, "No." |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-02-28 06:34 |