You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
'Iran must not have a nuclear weapon'
2006-03-01
US President George W. Bush said Wednesday that if Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.

On a surprise visit to Afghanistan, Bush said Iran should be allowed to have a civilian nuclear program, but that the "world is hiding behind speaking with one voice" in opposing Iranian development of a nuclear weapon.

"Iran must not have a nuclear weapon," Bush said during a news conference in the Afghan capital of Kabul. "The most destabilizing thing that can happen in this region and the world is for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."

In Moscow, the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator said Wednesday that there was no need for Tehran to resume a moratorium on uranium enrichment activity, Russian news agencies reported.

"A moratorium is necessary when there is something dangerous. But all our activities are as transparent as our duplicity ," Ali Larijani said after arriving in Moscow for talks, according to the Interfax news agency.

Maintaining his poker face Larijani also said that Tehran agrees to all inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency if they are conducted in line with international law, the RIA-Novosti news agency reported.

Meanwhile, Russia's top diplomat reiterated Moscow's call for Iran to return to a moratorium on enriching uranium as a condition for taking part in a joint enrichment facility on Russian territory.

"I do believe that a compromise that would not allow any violations of the nonproliferation agreement is possible," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters in Budapest, where President Vladimir Putin is on a state visit. "What is necessary is for Iran to come back to the moratorium, to accept the joint venture proposal as a package that would be supported by the members of the governors' board of the IAEA. I'm not saying that this is already decided."
Posted by:ryuge

#19  I doubt Bush will do anything about Iran acquiring a nuke

good thing that you support Bush so well Rif Raf.
Posted by: 2b   2006-03-01 23:56  

#18  How about that we agree Rantburg must have nuclear weapons. Joe being a prime example of a quality nuke.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-03-01 23:35  

#17  I'm beginning to think that Joe secretly writes for Newsmax.
Posted by: RWV   2006-03-01 22:40  

#16  I suspect Bush is going to wait till after the November US election. If Bush were to act against Iran now, the Dems would go crazy (OK, crazier).

At least that's what I hope he has planned. Or hope he has a plan.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-03-01 22:27  

#15  I am not convinced the Mullahs or MadMoud truly care about ISRAEL per se - the LT "Big Picture" is IRAN-CENTRIC, RADICAL ISLAM DOMINATED, REGIONAL [LATER GLOBAL?] FAITH-BASED TOTALITARIAN NUCLEARIZED EMPIRE WHICH ONLY THE HYPERPOWER+ USA AND ALLIED WESTERN DEMOCRACIES CAN PRECLUDE. The WOT > about what Nation(s) and -Ism(s) get to CONTROL THE WORLD, AND BY EXTENS FUTURE OWG - the USA keeps getting bigger vv enemies whom want what the USA-Allies have but are unwilling to reform or power-share", i.e. "liberalize" even for their own benefit/advantage. NO MATTER HOW MANY MILFOR CASUALTIES THE USA SUFFERS OVERSEAS, IRAN = NORKIES, ETAL. ARE JUST BLOODY, PC SIDESHOWS FOR THE BATTLE FOR AMERICA AND WASHINGTON. And remember, the Left's own scheme for the Battle for America INCLUDES ANTI-US "BRINKMANSHIP", "AMER HIROSHIMA(S), and MUTUALLY DESTRUCTIVE GLOBAL NUKE WAR BY OR SHORTLY AFTER 2020. AMERICA'S ENEMIES EITHER GET THEIR WAY, OR THEY'LL TAKE THE WHOLE WORLD WITH THEM TO HELL - you know, why the Left is no threat to America or anything; and why Left-beloved MULTIPOLAR/MULTIPLE CENTRES OF POWER = OWG = ONE SYSTEM FOR EVERYONE = AMERICA CANNOT BE GOVERNED/RULED BY AMERICANS, BY AND FOR AMERICANS = WHY RUSSIA-CHINA/COMMIE ASIA MUST DOMINATE AMERICA + WEST + THE WORLD!? Its NOT Socialism or Communism, its ANTI-FASCISM???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-03-01 22:24  

#14  C'mon Raphael, don't be shy...
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 22:18  

#13  No pussycat is definitely not the word.
Posted by: Rafael   2006-03-01 22:16  

#12  *blush*
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 22:16  

#11  "Pussycat" is not the word the first word that comes to mind, .com. But you always put on your most charming manners when you come in for tea. It's good for a man to be multilingual in that way. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-01 22:11  

#10  As for the hairball, lol, for someone who's dropped as many turds on the Burg's living room carpet as you have, Zenster, that's purdy rich.
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 21:54  

#9  Lol. Wotta fuckwit, Raphael! And I say it laughing out loud!
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 21:51  

#8  Go to fucking hell .com! And I say it with a smile :-)

But just to be clear...I doubt Bush will do anything about Iran acquiring a nuke. This is Israel's problem, and Israel will solve it.
Posted by: Rafael   2006-03-01 21:47  

#7  December booms on certain Iranian nuke sites, with Moolah regime change to follow thereafter.

Bush is play "the world" just as he did pre-Iraq. But "the world" is on the clock.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-01 21:38  

#6  I'm really a big, um, uh, er, (shit!), ah, a pussycat. Yeah, that's the ticket, lol.

Well, that sure is one he|| of a hairball you've hacked up on the carpet.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-03-01 20:59  

#5  :-)

I'm really a big, um, uh, er, (shit!), ah, a pussycat. Yeah, that's the ticket, lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 20:55  

#4  ummm ... just to clarify for anyone who's just stumbled into the 'Burg, .com's comments were written with heavy sarcasm.
Posted by: lotp   2006-03-01 20:50  

#3  Soon Zenster, it will happen soon.
Posted by: Visitor   2006-03-01 20:44  

#2  "The most destabilizing thing that can happen in this region and the world is for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."

If Bush knows this and understands that Iran has consistently sought to illegally acquire, clandestinely operate and belligerently utilize nuclear weapons, how can he justify leaving even the most rudimentary tools to facilitate such aspirations in Iranian hands?

Iran must be made to back down from their belicose stance and sponsorship of international terrorism. Anything less makes their continuing possession of even the most basic nuclear technology a mortal danger to America, Israel and many other countries.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-03-01 20:42  

#1  Lying Fucking Bush.

Rafael and Zen are right. Bush is an appeaser, a liar, a wimp who won't lift a finger to stop the MM's from acquiring Muzzy Viagra. He'll prolly secretly cheer when they vaporize a few square miles of tiny Israel. Might even help 'em. Fucking Jooos.
Posted by: .com   2006-03-01 20:29  

00:00