You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
NSA Sued for Surveilling Islamic Charity - Attorneys
2006-03-02
Posted by:.com

#8  NS, here I sit in Zamboanga wanting to strangle someone!! The ACLU, as you said, are there to protect the poor and those without representation. This is a disgusting distortion of what they were intended to do, it now is monster without controls. Thy are "The enemy within". God bless the United States of America, may each and every member of the ACLU rot in hell.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-03-02 09:56  

#7  Aided and abetted by a 'friendly' judiciary which is no longer subject to 'checks and balances' of legislative overwatch.
Posted by: Grererong Thromoger7008   2006-03-02 09:11  

#6  The ACLU was founded by people who might charitably be called fellow travellers. It has always been on the enemy's side. Only the enemy whose side it is on changes.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-02 09:09  

#5  So now the ACLU is going to bat to cover for jihadi funding channels?

Can we just get on with it and admit the ACLU is on the enemy's side?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-03-02 08:47  

#4  "... but we suspect that conversations of thousands of Americans..."

Sounds like a Fishin Mission
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-03-02 08:33  

#3   Who is paying for this?

You are.

In order to prevent the poor from being unable to bring suits against those who violate their civil rights, the law provides that if the plaintiff in civil rights litigation prevails they have thier legal fees paid by the defendant. That is why the government is the defendant in the creche on the twon square suits. Nobody minds if the city and its insurance company have to pay. These legal fees are a major source of funding for the ACLU and an invitation to invent suits where no real controversy exists.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-02 08:19  

#2  good. Maybe with enough focus on this issue we can demand that our law be followed and that these traitors be hung.
Posted by: 2b   2006-03-02 08:14  

#1  It does not matter if you buy food or guns, sending 150K to the Chechens is supporting the enemy. Food for the families of the fighters is money saved for bullets. What is no big surprise is the ACLU is representing them. Who is paying for this? If they can send hundreds of thousands to terrorists one would think they couold afford legal services. I hope our tax dollars are not paying for the undermining of American law.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-03-02 06:10  

00:00