You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Rest Well Tonight: UN Approves US-India Nuke Deal
2006-03-02
So, the PM of India asks Prez Bush if he would like New Delhi. Prez Bush says, Great, the WH deli is gettin' sorta stale.The U.N. nuclear watchdog welcomed a landmark civil nuclear deal between India and the United States on Thursday, saying it would end New Delhi's nuclear isolation and spur global non-proliferation efforts.

Under the deal, agreed as U.S. President George W. Bush visited New Delhi, Washington has offered India nuclear fuel and technology provided it separates its civil and military nuclear facilities and places the former under international inspections. Some U.S. lawmakers and nuclear experts have criticised the pact, saying it weakens international safeguards, especially the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which India has refused to sign calling it discriminatory.

But the support of Mohammed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Authority, gives the deal an important seal of approval. ElBaradei said the deal would help satisfy India's growing energy needs. "It would also bring India closer as an important partner in the non-proliferation regime," he said in a statement. "It would be a milestone, timely for ongoing efforts to consolidate the non-proliferation regime, combat nuclear terrorism and strengthen nuclear safety."

The deal still needs to be approved by the U.S. Congress, where it is sure to come under close scrutiny. Tom Lantos, the ranking Democrat on the House International Relations Committee, gave it a cautious welcome. "A reliable and dependable strategic partnership is in the interest of both our great countries, and this agreement could herald an even closer relationship between the United States and India," he said in a statement emailed to Reuters.

"Given the unprecedented nature of this agreement, the Congress will have to carefully examine the details of the separation plan to assure ourselves and our international partners that this agreement will indeed support our shared political and security objectives."

China was less positive, urging India to sign the NPT and also dismantle its nuclear weapons.
Posted by:Captain America

#9  Tag this additional deal on and everything gets more interesting U.S. to boost arms sales to India
: CNN

India will be able to buy more sophisticated fighter aircraft and other high-tech arms from the United States as part of a closer defense relationship between the two nations, the United States Department of Defense has said.

This would include state-of-the-art combat aircraft including the F-16 and F-18, the department said in a statement released Thursday.

"It is our goal to help meet India's needs in the defense realm, and to provide important capabilities and technologies that India seeks. We are on a path to accomplish this," the statement said.

[..]
Posted by: 3dc   2006-03-02 23:10  

#8  So it is a not a question about hide and seek (like in Iran or Iraq).

India has, and will continue to manufacture weapons. There is nothing for the IAEA to see with regard to this.

Anything not declared as civilian is military and these military sites cannot buy (a) fuel (b) safety equipment (c) componants. They will be off limits to inspections.

Most Indian R+D will be classified as military, not because it is but because they don't want IAEA folk around.

The truly sensitive stuff - the beryllium refining plant, the centrifuge cascades that make MEU fuel for the Indian Navy, the BARC complex that makes plutonium weapon pits, is and will continue to be off limits for obvious reasons.
Posted by: john   2006-03-02 21:01  

#7  IAEA inspections will be to ensure that no safeguarded material is diverted.
They will be limited to those facilities only.

Some Indian facilities may have reactors that are off limits. The inspector may look at reactor 1 and reactor 3 but reactor 2 is being used for weapon grade plutonium production and is off limits.

A rather different case than Iran or Iraq, both of which signed the NPT and must not have any military program.


Posted by: john   2006-03-02 20:29  

#6  Will that "overslight" extend the practice employed in Iran and pre-invasion Iraq?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-02 18:15  

#5  The IAEA has a long history working in India.

Several Indian power reactors are under IAEA safeguards.
One of the Indian plutonium reprocessing plants is under occasional safeguards. Whenenver spent fuel from a safeguarded reactor is being processed the inspectors come in.

They now get to extend their oversight...

Posted by: john   2006-03-02 17:51  

#4  Don't you appreciate the irony here?

The UN is the proverbial cat chasing its tail over Iran nukes, but has the balls to "approve" what the US is doing (independently) with India.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-02 17:25  

#3  This deal works in a bunch of different ways. First and foremost, it sets India up in a way similar to how Israel is set up. Israel has to defend itself from the Moslem world, India has to defend itself from China.

By allowing it to keep its weapons program off the table, this means that China won't know how many and how much nuclear nuclear weaponry India has, which would give China prickly heat if they were getting adventuresome in that direction.

Second, since their commercial production will be many times larger than their military production, this both forces it to be quality controlled to international standards and transparent with its production of weapons grade material and waste.

This is really good since nobody wants to see headlines about "The Indian Chernobyl".

Next, it is pretty obvious that the future for the major nations lies with large electrical grid nuclear power. If they do it on the table, it is always better than if they refuse to partner.

Finally, the US has an awful lot of nuclear fuel to sell. It was tremendously expensive to produce and we have immense stocks we would be glad to get rid of at a discount.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-03-02 16:14  

#2  Seeing that China gave nukes to Pakistan and North Korea...

And through them Iran, Libya, and God knows who else.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-03-02 15:47  

#1  Seeing that China gave nukes to Pakistan and North Korea, that last sentence is the rankest hypocrisy.
Posted by: Grunter   2006-03-02 14:46  

00:00