You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Teheran park 'cleansed' of traces from nuclear site
2006-03-06
The Ents are gonna be pissed about this one.
Iran's Revolutionary Guards have taken the extraordinary step of cutting down thousands of trees in Teheran to prevent United Nations inspectors from finding traces of enriched uranium from a top-secret nuclear plant.

News of last month's cleansing operation comes as the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-member board meets in Vienna today to decide whether Iran should be reported to the United Nations Security Council for failing to comply with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.


Dr Mohamed ElBaradei: scathing report on Iran
According to western intelligence sources, more than 7,000 trees which may have contained incriminating nuclear traces have been lost in a popular parkland area in the city near the Lavizan atomic research centre.

At today's meeting Dr Mohamed ElBaradei, the IAEA head, is expected to deliver a scathing report on Iran's nuclear programme, which Teheran insists is aimed solely at developing an indigenous nuclear power industry.

But Dr ElBaradei will inform the board that he is not in a position to assert that the nuclear programme is "entirely peaceful", and blames Teheran for its lack of "transparency" over its nuclear programme. His report will add to the suspicions of western governments that Iran has a clandestine programme to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran threatened to begin large-scale uranium enrichment if the IAEA formally refers it the Security Council. The Islamic republic's top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani told a press conference: "Research and development is in our national interest and Iran will not go back on that. If they (America and allies) want to use force, we will pursue our own path.

One of the IAEA's key concerns has been the government's conduct over the Lavizan complex. The IAEA only became aware of its existence after Iranian exiles provided details of its location at a military base in Teheran in 2003.

Iran was accused of using the facility to conduct research into nuclear enrichment, and Israeli military officials claimed that the prototypes of four nuclear warheads were also stored at the site.

Western intelligence officials believe the site was deliberately situated in a major population area to make it more difficult for the United States and Israel, which are determined to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons, from carrying out pre-emptive air strikes.

The Iranians responded to the exiles' disclosure by razing the complex in 2004 before IAEA inspectors could conduct a full investigation.

To ensure that no incriminating traces of nuclear activity were found, they even ploughed the site and removed six inches of topsoil.

Despite these efforts, IAEA inspectors still found traces of enriched uranium in soil collected from the site. Intelligence officials concluded that the traces came from nuclear equipment acquired from Dr A Q Khan, the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb.

Recent tests in the area by scientists working for the Atomic Energy Agency of Iran (AEOI) showed unusually high concentrations of uranium contamination in the leaves and branches of trees surrounding the site. The scientists unanimously recommended that preparations should be made in case IAEA inspectors decided to conduct further visits.

The order to cut down the trees was given by Mohamed Baker Khalibaf, the mayor of Teheran, who is close to President Mahmoud Ahmadnijehad. The official explanation for the destruction of the trees was to create a national park.

"The destruction of the trees is yet another example of the measures the Iranians are prepared to take to conceal the true nature of the nuclear programme," said a senior western official.

"But after three years of deliberately trying to conceal their activities from the IAEA, none of the member states is prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt."

Posted by:lotp

#16  THank you, Tehran! You just made it much easier for our reconnaissance assets to watch every move you make. You used to be able to hide under the leaves and branches of trees, now there's nothing to cover your fat a$$. Removing the trees also makes it easier for us to blow your silly head off with a Hellfire missile, or destroy your meeting sites with a Tomahawk cruise missile. If we do get down to using nukes, the slight shelter those trees may have given you from direct exposure to gamma and x-rays is now gone. I'm sure your six-legged son will thank you for that - if he survives being born.

Talk about unintended consequences!
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-03-06 18:11  

#15  What about the livers and fatty tissues of all the baby ducks?
Posted by: 6   2006-03-06 16:07  

#14  Where's the Sierra Club when you need them?
Posted by: Zenster   2006-03-06 13:35  

#13  Now if we can just get PETA pissed at them.
Pam Anderson in a Burga.
Posted by: plainslow   2006-03-06 13:07  

#12  Cancer cluster in 5...4...3...

Doesn't Iranian Islamism on its own prequalify as a cancer cluster?
Posted by: Zenster   2006-03-06 13:06  

#11  Cancer cluster in 5...4...3...
Posted by: SLO Jim   2006-03-06 13:02  

#10  They needed the wood for masts and yardarms and such for their navy.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-03-06 12:57  

#9  Global warming here we come. I can see the water rising at the beach. Ooops, that was just the tide coming in.

Where's Green Peace's public statement against this kind of wanton slaughter? Does this kind of stuff get them ticked off?
Posted by: Delphi2005   2006-03-06 12:16  

#8  they'll bungle it up soon just you wait - some dip shit will chenobel the place :)
Posted by: ShepUK   2006-03-06 12:13  

#7  I call bullshait on the 'Peaceful purposes' claim...

After all people (in Tehran) who glow in the dark don't need no lights......
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-03-06 11:52  

#6  I wonder what the citizens of Tehran are thinking about this. If there are traces of enriched unranium in the trees, presumably it is floating all over the city.
Posted by: DoDo   2006-03-06 11:29  

#5  Teheran park 'cleansed' of traces from nuclear site

They call it a "park". We'll probably call it a "car park".
Posted by: Zenster   2006-03-06 11:24  

#4  What're they going to do with the roots?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-06 11:08  

#3  You have angered Gaia.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-03-06 11:06  

#2  Al Gore will not be pleased.
Posted by: doc   2006-03-06 10:48  

#1  Run, forest!
Posted by: BH   2006-03-06 10:32  

00:00