You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
AP Sues for Access to Lindh's Petitions
2006-03-07
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Associated Press sued the Justice Department on Monday for access to American-born Taliban soldier John Walker Lindh's petitions to have his 20-year federal prison sentence shortened.

The federal Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in New York, said the government has improperly refused to turn over Lindh's pleas to have his sentence reduced on the grounds that doing so would be an unwarranted invasion of his privacy. AP's lawyers, in letters to the Justice Department and the lawsuit, however, said Lindh ``is a 'high-profile public figure' whose 'privacy interest in his petition is low to nonexistent.'''

Lindh's lawyer, James Brosnahan, also has told the news cooperative that he would have turned over the documents himself, but he can't under the terms of Lindh's imprisonment.
He was sentenced as part of a plea-bargin. Didn't the lawyer read the fine print?
The Justice Department did not immediately comment on the lawsuit.

Lindh, 25, was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001 in the U.S.-led effort to topple the Taliban following the Sept. 11 attacks. Prosecutors charged him with conspiring to kill Americans and supporting terrorists. He pleaded guilty to lesser offenses in 2002, including carrying weapons against U.S. forces. He avoided a potential life sentence and agreed to withdraw claims that he had been abused or tortured in U.S. custody.

The AP said it believes Lindh ``contends in his petition that he was prosecuted and convicted unfairly in the immediate wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, and that he was not, in fact, knowingly fighting the United States in Afghanistan.''
He says that now, but he pleaded guilty. Sounds like the usual prison con.
Lindh, who is held at the medium security federal penitentiary in Victorville, Calif., first applied for clemency in September 2004, following up on his request 15 months later. Justice officials told him it would be at least a year before any decision is made.

AP first sought the records on Jan. 4. Nine days later, the department replied it could only release the documents with Lindh's written consent, according to the lawsuit. But Lindh is barred from making any public comment on the matter, including consenting to the release, under the terms of his plea agreement, the suit said.
Told ya. It's his tough luck.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  SPoD, 'cause it's more fun to watch them make up stories about their bravery than to actually give them even the slightest bit of evidence to back up their martyr complexes.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2006-03-07 16:29  

#8  He was armed and active on the OTHER SIDE. I'd have shot his worthless ass on the spot, and slept well that night.
Posted by: mojo   2006-03-07 14:48  

#7  99% of the group know as "reporters" are on the other side if anyone had not noticed. (I know most of you have.) Why do we not treat them as enemies?
Posted by: SPoD   2006-03-07 14:20  

#6  AP (associated press, not me, heh) must have the need for filler material in their stories. Clue: look to Iran, there are lots of stories ready to be written, but you have to get your fat a$$es off the bar stool and get out in the field to get some protein in your stories. Pfeh. A pox--a proliterian pox on your house.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-03-07 13:44  

#5  CS - I hope has trouble falling every waking hour - and while he's asleep as wll
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-07 12:48  

#4  Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Brosnahan Jihad Johnny's lawyer when he signed the damn document in the first place?

And now he's trying to get it put aside because it was "too harsh"? Talk about chutzpah.

The only thing that would make it more perfect is if Brosnahan argues that Johnny's sentence should be reduced because of his own legal malpractice. (Maybe that's the real reason he doesn't wanna talk about it??? ;) )
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2006-03-07 11:25  

#3  "...He was really in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

And just how the f*** did he get there, hmmmm? Did Scotty accidentally beam him over? Talk about avoiding personal responsibility, bleah!
Posted by: AlanC   2006-03-07 11:07  

#2  Interesting, does the AP think there is a big groundswell of support for terrorits in prison? I would not lose any sleep if Johnny Jihad had a bad fall on his way to the yard one day.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-03-07 10:35  

#1  Lindh, who is held at the medium security federal penitentiary in Victorville, Calif

Unbelievable, medium security pen. Had he been executed like traitors and spys used to be, none of this would be an issue.


“We are not asking for a pardon but for a reduction in the sentence. He was really in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

James Brosnahan
Posted by: Visitor   2006-03-07 08:44  

00:00