You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Judge tosses DeLay case subpoenas
2006-03-14
A state appeals court today threw out more than 30 subpoenas requested by Travis County prosecutors building a criminal case against U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, saying the investigation should have stopped in December when a district judge halted proceedings in his court.

District Attorney Ronnie Earle has been issuing the subpoenas ever since Senior District Judge Pat Priest dismissed all or part of three indictments against DeLay, R-Sugar Land. Earle appealed Priest's ruling, and the judge stayed the case pending a ruling by the Third Court of Appeals.

Most of the subpoenas involved political fund-raising controversies that have involved DeLay, some dating back to 1996.

After Earle subpoenaed records from DeLay's wife, Christine, DeLay's legal team asked Priest to quash the subpoenas. Priest told DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin that the case was stayed while on appeal, so he would neither halt Earle from issuing subpoenas nor would he enforce them.

DeGuerin then asked the appeals court to intervene.

"Because the state has obtained a stay in the proceedings ... we hold that subpoenas may not issue compelling witnesses to testify and produce documents at the stayed proceedings," the order by a three-judge panel said.

The panel, which is scheduled to hear Earle's appeal on March 22, said Earle may not issue any more subpoenas while the stay is in effect; ruled all the ones issued after the stay are "null and void;" and any subpoenas issued before the stay are suspended while the appeal is pending.

The unsigned order was issued by Judges Bea A. Smith, David Puryear and Alan Waldrop. Smith is a Democrat. Puryear and Waldrop are Republicans who are up for re-election this year.

DeGuerin was not immediately available for comment, but his law partner Matt Hennessy called it a victory in stopping Earle from running a "political" investigation.

"Congressman DeLay doesn't have anything to fear from whatever evidence might have been produced," Hennessy said. "The point here is Ronnie Earle is abusing his office ... to have a court declare that Ronnie Earle was abusing his office, and that is in effect what the Third Court said."

Earle's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DeLay originally was indicted last year on charges of conspiring to violate the state's election code in connection with how a political committee he founded raised and spent corporate money.

A second pair of indictments was issued the following week restating the election code conspiracy charge and added charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and money laundering. DeLay has denied all the charges and accused Earle of conducting an investigation just to knock DeLay out of the U.S. House majority leader's position.

Judge Priest in December dismissed all the charges involving conspiracy to violate the election code. Priest said that was not against the law until 2003, a year after the alleged misconduct by the DeLay-related committee, Texans for a Republican Majority.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#8  Fishing expedition cut short, looks like.
Posted by: mojo   2006-03-14 16:40  

#7  And Earle will be re-elected.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-14 15:04  

#6  be interesting how much this has cost Travis County when all is said an ddone...
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-14 14:59  

#5  TW - Delay's a congressman, not a senator.

Also, he still has his seat - he was in DC to vote for renewing the Patriot Act, IIRC.

He just won his primary in Texas by a whopping margin. Makes you think maybe his constituents know a bullshit political witch-hunt when they see it. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-03-14 14:35  

#4  So when this is over, will DeLay resume his seat in the Senate? If he needs to run again, is it likely he'll win? This could make for very interesting times in his corner of Texas, and in Washington in the near future. :-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-14 13:51  

#3  Gee, why haven't I seen this on MSM sites?

Oh ya...
Posted by: mmurray821   2006-03-14 10:44  

#2  out of control prosecutors should lose any legal protection from suit - Delay should take him for everything he and Travis County has
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-14 09:53  

#1  Ronnie Earle is legally, insane, lol.
Posted by: Hupeting Slineng3538   2006-03-14 08:43  

00:00