| Submit your comments on this article |
| China-Japan-Koreas |
| N.Korea army threatens pre-emptive attack |
| 2006-03-14 |
| North Korea has the right to launch a pre-emptive attack against U.S.-backed South Korean forces because the two Koreas are technically still at war, the communist state's official media said on Tuesday. The comments came as North Korea shows its displeasure with annual joint South Korean-U.S. military exercises, which Pyongyang has said are a preparation for an invasion of its territory. A spokesman for the North's Korea People's Army (KPA) said distrust is high between the United States and North Korea, and Pyongyang "will never remain a passive onlooker to the U.S. pre-emptive attack on the DPRK," its official news agency reported. DPRK is short for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "The KPA side is of the view that a pre-emptive attack is not (the) monopoly of the U.S. and the DPRK, too, has the right to pre-empt an attack as the most effective and positive act for self-defense in the light of the hard reality that the DPRK and the U.S. sides are still technically at war," the spokesman was cited as saying. The 1950-1953 Korean War ended in a truce and not a peace treaty meaning that the two Koreas are technically still at war. The United States led U.N. forces in defense of South Korea and signed the armistice agreement in that capacity. U.S. and South Korean forces will stage annual field exercises from March 25 to March 31 designed to coordinate defenses of the southern half of the peninsula. "The KPA will follow with a high degree of vigilance the grave situation prevailing on the Korean peninsula due to the projected war maneuvers and keep itself fully ready to go into action to cope with any event on its own initiative," the spokesman said. North Korea has said the joint drills are an impediment to progress in six-party talks aimed at ending North Korea's nuclear weapons programs. The last round of the talks among the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States was held in November 2005. The talks have hit a snag over Washington's decision to crack down on firms it suspects of helping North Korea in illicit activity such as counterfeiting. North Korea has said it is unthinkable for it to return to the talks while Washington is trying to topple its leaders through the financial measures. Washington, Seoul and others have said the crackdown is a matter for law enforcement and not related to the six-party talks. In previous years, North Korea has placed its civil defense system on high alert at the time of the joint drills that have been taking place for four decades. There are about 30,000 U.S. troops in South Korea in support of some 690,000 South Korean troops. The North has about 1.2 million troops. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #7 Read, the Norkies = Iran + Syria, etc > US decisions andor mil actions may result in a "preemptive" North Korea comando-sapper first strike against Dubya, Washington, CONUS and Amer interests - IOW, A NORKIE 9-11!? Spetznatz + North Korea = SpetzNork/SpetzKor??? Whether SpetzLamists or SpetzNorks, HAIL HILLARY AND OWG. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-03-14 21:21 |
| #6 I don't know which I'd rather see, this or Feingold's censure brought to a vote. Order in extra popcorn, must be sweeps week. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-03-14 14:23 |
| #5 No "rivers of fire" hyperbole, no atomic fu, 1.5 on the spittle meter. Joe Bob says false alarm. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-03-14 11:50 |
| #4 Iran deflection, again. |
| Posted by: Whineger Phaviting8058 2006-03-14 11:48 |
| #3 If the NK's planned on doing anything they wouldn't be talking about it. |
| Posted by: Iblis 2006-03-14 11:45 |
| #2 Technically it is only a ceasefire with the UN. So by obverse side of that coin - technically the UN could attach NK at anytime and without reason. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-03-14 10:57 |
| #1 Go for it. Really. The ROKs are good enough now to kick your sorry ass back across the border without US help. |
| Posted by: mmurray821 2006-03-14 10:43 |